David Krug1, René Baumann1,2, Wilfried Budach3, Marciana Nona Duma4, Jürgen Dunst1, Petra Feyer5, Rainer Fietkau6, Wulf Haase7, Wolfgang Harms8, Thomas Hehr9, Marc D Piroth10, Felix Sedlmayer11, Rainer Souchon12, Frederik Wenz13, Rolf Sauer6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany. 5. Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany. 6. University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. 7. St.-Vincentius-Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 8. St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 10. HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany. 11. Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria. 12. University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 13. University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gene expression assays are increasingly used for decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. There are some clinical situations in which there is also a need for better prognostic and predictive markers to better estimate the amount of benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The rising availability of gene expression analyses prompts the question whether their results can also be used to guide clinical decisions regarding adjuvant radiation. SUMMARY: Multiple studies suggest a correlation between results from gene expression assays and locoregional recurrence rates. Only few publications addressed the predictive value of results from gene expression analysis for the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in different settings. KEY MESSAGES: To date, the available evidence on the possible predictive value of gene expression assays for radiotherapy does not support their inclusion into the decision-making process for adjuvant radiation. This is due to methodological weaknesses and limitations regarding patient selection, the nonrandomized design of all studies in terms of radiotherapy use, and limited availability of tissue from prospective trials. Thus, utilization of the present knowledge for clinical indication of radiotherapy should be very cautious.
BACKGROUND: Gene expression assays are increasingly used for decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. There are some clinical situations in which there is also a need for better prognostic and predictive markers to better estimate the amount of benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The rising availability of gene expression analyses prompts the question whether their results can also be used to guide clinical decisions regarding adjuvant radiation. SUMMARY: Multiple studies suggest a correlation between results from gene expression assays and locoregional recurrence rates. Only few publications addressed the predictive value of results from gene expression analysis for the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in different settings. KEY MESSAGES: To date, the available evidence on the possible predictive value of gene expression assays for radiotherapy does not support their inclusion into the decision-making process for adjuvant radiation. This is due to methodological weaknesses and limitations regarding patient selection, the nonrandomized design of all studies in terms of radiotherapy use, and limited availability of tissue from prospective trials. Thus, utilization of the present knowledge for clinical indication of radiotherapy should be very cautious.
Authors: Bas Kreike; Hans Halfwerk; Petra Kristel; Annuska Glas; Hans Peterse; Harry Bartelink; Marc J van de Vijver Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Peter Wu; Moses Tam; Fauzia Shaikh; Anna Lee; Jennifer Chun; Freya Schnabel; Amber Guth; Sylvia Adams; David Schreiber; Cheonguen Oh; Naamit K Gerber Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eleftherios P Mamounas; Qing Liu; Soonmyung Paik; Frederick L Baehner; Gong Tang; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; S Rim Kim; Steven M Butler; Farid Jamshidian; Diana B Cherbavaz; Amy P Sing; Steven Shak; Thomas B Julian; Barry C Lembersky; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Edith A Perez; John A Olson; JoAnne Zujewski; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; James N Atkins; Jeffrey L Berenberg; George W Sledge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eleftherios P Mamounas; Gong Tang; Bernard Fisher; Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Joseph P Costantino; Drew Watson; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Christopher Wale; John Forbes; Elizabeth A Mallon; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Anita Dunbier; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Steven Shak Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David D Yang; Daniela L Buscariollo; Angel M Cronin; Shicheng Weng; Melissa E Hughes; Richard J Bleicher; Adam L Cohen; Sara H Javid; Stephen B Edge; Beverly Moy; Joyce C Niland; Antonio C Wolff; Michael J Hassett; Rinaa S Punglia Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 3.481