| Literature DB >> 32397623 |
Ruirui Wang1, Jian Huang1, Aichen Liang1, Ying Wang1, Luis Alejandro Jose Mur2, Min Wang1, Shiwei Guo1.
Abstract
Fusaric acid (FA), the fungal toxin produced byEntities:
Keywords: copper; distribution; fusaric acid; mitigation; oxidative stress; zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397623 PMCID: PMC7247006 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Effects of Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn on cucumber plants under fusaric acid (FA) supply. (A) 3-week-old seedlings were cultured with Hoagland solutions containing 2 µg mL−1 FA and different concentrations of Fe, Mn, Cu or Zn. CK, control plants; CK + FA, control plants after FA treatment. Each ion consists of four concentration series, denoted by 1, 2, 3, 4; Zn concentrations were 0, 9.6, 48 and 144 µM; Cu concentrations were 0, 2, 20 and 40 µM; Mn concentrations were 0, 57, 114 and 570 µM; Fe concentrations were 0, 89.5, 179 and 358 µM. The two treatments in the red box were selected for the following experiments. Thermal images of cucumber plants under light conditions after different treatments were shown on the right. The treatments directly correspond to the left. The temperature quantification results represent the means of four replicates (°C). (B) FA total amount in the plant with different treatments. The letters in the thermal image on the right side of figure (A) indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among all treatments (a total of 18 treatments). The letters above the bars of the histogram in figure (B) indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among all different treatments (a total of 17 treatments) and bars represent standard deviation with four replications.
Growth and photosynthesis parameters of cucumber plants regulated by Zn and Cu under fusaric acid supply.
| Treatments | CK | CK + FA | Zn + FA | Cu + FA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | 18.3 ± 1.46 a | 15.2 ± 0.28 b | 18.7 ± 2.08 a | 17.5 ± 0.50 ab |
| Root length (cm) | 15.5 ± 1.15 a | 14.7 ± 0.60 a | 15.0 ± 1.70 a | 14.3 ± 0.57 a |
| SPAD | 48.9 ± 1.30 a | 43.3 ± 0.60 b | 49.6 ± 2.00 a | 49.9 ± 1.90 a |
| Plant dry weight (g) | 0.71 ± 0.02 b | 0.62 ± 0.03 c | 0.83 ± 0.02 a | 0.80 ± 0.04 a |
| Pn(μmolCO2m−2s−1) | 22.0 ± 0.67 a | 13.8 ± 1.51 c | 17.0 ± 0.16 b | 18.0 ± 0.28 b |
| gs(molH2Om−2s−1) | 0.74 ± 0.01 a | 0.12 ± 0.00 c | 0.48 ± 0.01ab | 0.62 ± 0.02 a |
| Ci(μmolCO2mol−1) | 357 ± 7.63 a | 258 ± 5.50 c | 328 ± 0.95 b | 365 ± 6.35 a |
| E(mmolH2Om−2s−1) | 9.06 ± 0.49 a | 3.08 ± 0.29 b | 9.43 ± 0.02 a | 9.16 ± 0.02 a |
| E/gs(10−3) | 7.42 ± 0.79 b | 18.7 ± 1.62 a | 8.42 ± 0.03 b | 7.39 ± 0.11 b |
| Wilting index (%) | - | 100 ± 5.77 a | 7.3 ± 0.76 b | 8.63 ± 0.30 b |
Note: Plants of 3-week-old seedlings of cucumber plants were immersed in Hoagland solutions with indicated concentrations of FA (2 µg ml−1) for 3 days. SPAD, the leaf chlorophyll content; Plant Dry weight, the whole plant tissues; Pn, the net photosynthetic rate; gs, the stomatal conductance; Ci, the intercellular CO2 concentration; E, the transpiration rate; E/gs, the ratio of transpiration rate to stomatal conductance. The ratio of the transpiration rate to stomatal conductance (E/gs) was calculated to indicate the water loss outside of the stomata. The data were shown as the mean ± SD of four replicates. Significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments are indicated by different letters.
Figure 2Zinc and copper had different effects on fusaric acid (FA) absorption and distribution in plants. (A) FA content in the root, stem and leaf of differentially treated cucumber plants. (B) The total amount of FA in plant tissues and nutrient solutions. (C) The ratio of shoot to root FA content. Bars represent standard deviation with four replications each. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test) of the same tissue with different treatments.
Figure 3Relationship between Cu2+ and Zn2+ distribution and the FA distribution. Cu2+ or Zn2+ content (A,B) and amount (C,D) of cucumber plant issues treated with fusaric acid (FA). Bars represent the standard deviation of three replicated each. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test) of the same tissue among three treatments.
Figure 4Ions mitigated toxicity of FA in vitro. (A) CuSO4 and ZnSO4 as resources of Cu and Zn were mixed in the FA aqueous solution (2 µg mL−1) for 24 h. Zn or Cu concentrations were 8, 16, 32, 64 and 96 µM. (B) CuSO4 aqueous solution (200 µM) or ZnSO4 aqueous solution (480 µM) or EDTA-Cu (200 µM) or EDTA-Zn aqueous (480 µM) solution were mixed with FA (20 µg mL−1) in vitro for 24 h and then seedlings were placed into each respective solution. Plant symptoms were imaged after a further 3 days.
Figure 5Effects of Zn or Cu on FA elicited ROS and cell membrane injury mitigation in leaf and root. The root (A) and leaf (B) H2O2, MDA and antioxidant enzyme activity levels were determined after treatment with FA for 72 h. (C) Relative membrane injury in the root and leaf. Bars represent standard deviation with four replications each. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test) among different treatments.
Figure 6Ions enhance the tolerance of cucumber to fusaric acid by different mechanisms. Changing transportation (Zn) or absorption (Cu) and chelation reaction plays pivotal roles in toxicity mitigation of FA. Zn or Cu alleviates the ROS damage (lipid peroxidation, membrane injury) of FA to cucumber plants by modification in antioxidant enzymes system. The mitigation reaction, which could involve chelation, occurs in both Zn + FA and Cu + FA treatments. The arrow in green indicates the mitigation rate compared to the control. Arrows in yellow represent the transportation of FA to the ground under different treatments. Different degrees of yellow represent the FA content.