| Literature DB >> 32397583 |
Wenchang Yang1,2, Zhiqian Wang1, Chengwu Shen1,2, Yusheng Liu1,2, Shaojin Liu1, Qinwen Li1,2, Wen Du1,2, Zhuoda Song1,2.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a scheme for measuring the focal length of a collimating optical instrument. First, a mathematical model for measuring the focal length of a collimator with double gratings is derived based on the moiré fringe formula and the principles of geometric optics. Mathematical simulation shows that a slight difference in the focal length of two collimators has an important influence on the imaging law of moiré fringes. Our solution has a good resolution ability for focal length differences within 5‱, especially in the small angle range below 4°. Thus, the focal length of collimators can be measured by the amplification of the slight difference. Further, owing to the relative reference measurement, the measurement resolution at the symmetrical position of focal length is poor. Then, in the designed experiment, a corresponding moiré image at different angles is acquired using collimators with known focal length. The experimental results indicate that the root mean square error (RMSE) of the collimator corresponding to grating angles of 2°-4° is better than 4.7‱, indicating an ideal measurement accuracy of the proposed scheme. This work demonstrates that our proposed scheme can achieve an ideal accuracy in the measurement of a symmetrical optical path.Entities:
Keywords: double grating; focal length measurement; mathematical model; moiré fringe; self-collimating optical system
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397583 PMCID: PMC7249203 DOI: 10.3390/s20092718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram of focal length measurement. CCD, charge coupled device.
Figure 2Moiré fringe coordinate system.
Figure 3Curve of fringe width with focal length difference.
Figure 4Variation of moiré fringe width at different focal length ratios of f1 and f2: (a) rotation angle of G2 is 1°, (b) rotation angle of G2 is 2°, where the green box represents f2 > f1 and the red represents f2 < f1.
Figure 5Layout of experimental setup.
Main parameters of experimental setup. CCD, charge coupled device.
| Property | Unit | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelength of the red LED | nm | 625 |
| Focal length of collimator 1 | mm | 1325 |
| Focal length of collimator 2 | mm | 1295 |
| Grating pitch | μm | 70 |
| Grating diameter | mm | 10 |
| Pixel size of CCD | μm | 4.8 |
| Resolution of CCD | pixel | 1999 × 2000 |
| Leica theodolite | arcsec | ±0.5 |
| Shaft encoder | arcsec | 0.1 |
Figure 6Structural principles of the emitting part: (a) physical installation, (b) principle structure.
Figure 7Moiré fringe image. (a) The original image; (b) extracted center lines.
Measurement results (unit: mm).
| Order | 2° | 3° | 4° | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Error | Result | Error | Result | Error | |
| 1 | 1297.4 | 2.4 | 1298.3 | 3.3 | 1301.5 | 6.5 |
| 2 | 1296.9 | 1.9 | 1292.9 | −2.1 | 1289.4 | −5.6 |
| 3 | 1297.1 | 2.1 | 1298.7 | 3.7 | 1300.7 | 5.7 |
| 4 | 1293.7 | −1.3 | 1300.5 | 5.5 | 1291.7 | −3.3 |
| 5 | 1292.8 | −2.2 | 1292.6 | −2.4 | 1290.6 | −4.4 |
| 6 | 1297.7 | 2.7 | 1299.8 | 4.8 | 1301.8 | 6.8 |
| 7 | 1298.9 | 3.9 | 1230.1 | 5.1 | 1303.2 | 8.2 |
| 8 | 1297.2 | 2.2 | 1299.5 | 4.5 | 1302.1 | 7.1 |
| 9 | 1298.1 | 3.1 | 1291.7 | −3.3 | 1289.4 | −5.6 |
| 10 | 1293.2 | −1.8 | 1292.5 | −2.5 | 1301.5 | 6.5 |
Comparison of existing focal length measurement solutions.
| Methods | Accuracy | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Our scheme | 1.9‰–4.7‰ | Stable structural design, and good suitability for batch testing. |
| Conjugate | <5% | Wide application range, but unstable measurement accuracy. |
| Fizeau interferometer | <1‰ | Good suitability for single lens, but high environmental requirements. |
| Talbot interferometry | 0.5‰–2‰ | Specially designed multi-parameter model for targeted purpose. |
| Laser differential confocal method | 0.1‰–1‰ | Good suitability for ultra-long focal length, but few applications. |