| Literature DB >> 32397170 |
Song Li1, Rui Xiong2, Jiahui Zhai2, Kaiyin Zhang1, Wenyu Jiang2, Fa Yang3, Xiaoquan Yang4, Hua Zhao5.
Abstract
In order to ensure the safety of traffic, asphalt pavement is commonly required to utilize aggregates with excellent anti-abrasion property. This results in the lack of high-quality aggregates. The incorporation of solid waste in the aggregates is regarded as a high potential alternative for solving this problem. Since its material properties, such as rough surface, high Polished Stone Value (PSV) and the excellent adhesion property of asphalt, Basic Oxygen Furnace (BOF) slag can effectively improve the skid resistance of asphalt mixtures. First, the material properties of BOF slag are reviewed in this study. Then, the skid resistance of asphalt mixtures and aggregates are commendably evaluated by the Polished Stone Value test, Wehner/Schulze Tester, Aachen Polishing Machine, British Pendulum Test and Sand Patch test. The physical and mechanical properties of BOF slag play a key role in asphalt mixtures. This review found that the skid resistance mechanism of the BOF slag asphalt mixture is governed by factors such as BOF slag properties, incorporation methods and gradation types. Finally, the economic and environmental benefits of BOF slag asphalt mixtures were discussed. In addition, the function of gas catalysis and the melting of ice and snow can be added to the BOF slag asphalt mixture for a cleaner development in engineering. Furthermore, the existing problems, research directions and corresponding measures in this field are directed towards more durable and functional asphalt pavement construction.Entities:
Keywords: BOF slag; asphalt mixtures; differential polishing principle; road engineering; skid resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397170 PMCID: PMC7254413 DOI: 10.3390/ma13092169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Composition in %weight of basic oxygen furnace (BOF)-Steel obtained from different countries.
| Country | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | CaO | MnO | Fe2O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China [ | 5.19 | 3.25 | 19.24 | 1.41 | 42.70 | 1.77 | 24.55 |
| USA [ | 12.7 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 0.3 | 11 | 1.8 | 26.2 |
| Japan [ | 6.4 | 1.5 | 13.8 | - | 44.3 | 5.3 | 17.5 |
| France [ | 5 | 2.5 | 13 | 1 | 40 | 6 | 29 |
X-ray fluorescence (XRF) test results of different aggregates [22].
| Chemical Composition of Different Aggregate (mass%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | MgO | Al2O3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | CaO | MnO | Fe2O3 |
| BOF | 5.19 | 3.25 | 19.24 | 1.41 | 42.70 | 1.77 | 24.55 |
| limestone | 1.74 | 0.30 | 14.55 | 1.02 | 46.80 | 4.30 | 0.20 |
| basalt | 5.59 | 18.30 | 58.09 | 0.97 | 7.14 | 3.22 | 0.50 |
Mineral phases in BOF slag [8].
| Mineral | α-Dicalcium | β-Dicalcium | γ-Dicalcium | Tri-calcium | RO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical Formula | (α-C2S) | (β-C2S) | (γ-C2S) | (C3S) | MgO-FeO-MnO |
Figure 1Macro and micro morphology of BOF slag. (a) is macro morphology; (b–d) are micro morphology.
Figure 2Macro and micro morphology of basalt and limestone: (a,b) basalt; (c,d) limestone.
Technical indicators of BOF slag and natural aggregates [30].
| Properties | Units | BOF Slag | Basalt | Limestone | JTG F40-2004 * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk Density | g/cm3 | 3.290 | 2.900 | 2.750 | ≥2.6000 |
| Water Absorption | % | 1.18 | 0.70 | 1.05 | ≤2.00 |
| Los Angeles coefficient (LA) | % | 13.1 | 14.9 | 22.0 | ≤28.0 |
| Polished Stone Value (PSV) | % | 57 | 49 | 44 | ≥42 |
| Crush value | % | 12.0 | 12.9 | 15.1 | ≤26.0 |
* JTG F40-2004 is Technical Specification for Construction of Highway Asphalt Pavements in China.
Figure 3The morphological characteristics of aggregates.
The methods to control the volume expansion of steel slag.
| Methods | Researchers |
|---|---|
| Covering steel slag surface | Chen [ |
| Aging | Chen [ |
| Using acidic compound to react with steel slag | Ding [ |
Polishing property test method of aggregates and asphalt mixtures [57,58,59,60,61].
| Methods | Materials | Standards | Indicators | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polished | Aggregates | EN 1097-8 | PSV | Simple | Lower accuracy |
| Wehner/Schulze Tester | Aggregates/mixtures | EN 12697-49 | FAP * | Ability to simulated the interaction between tire and road surface | Certain conditions |
| Aachen Polishing Machine | Aggregates/mixtures | / | PSV | Good correlation with the reality of the road | Certain temperature |
| The British Pendulum Tester | Aggregates/mixtures | EN 1097-8 | PTV | High efficiency | Lower accuracy |
| Sand Patch test | Mixtures | EN 13036-1 | MTD | Simple | Lower accuracy |
* FAP is Friction after Polishing; PTV is Pendulum Test; MTD is Mean Texture Depth.
Figure 4The contrast between general polishing and differential polishing.
The incorporation methods of aggregate in asphalt mixture [67,68,69,70,71].
| Aggregate Type | Density Difference (%) | MaximumSize (mm) | Mixtures Type | Incorporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOF with Gneiss [ | 18 | 4.75 | Surperpave-12.5 | In volume |
| Ceramsite with Basalt [ | 50 | 13.2 | SMA-13 | Volume mass conversion |
| BOF with Basalt [ | 15-20 | 13.2 | AC-13, SMA-13 | Volume mass conversion |
| Limestone with Basalt [ | 5 | 16 | AC-13, SMA-13 | In mass |
| Limestone with Basalt [ | 3 | 16 | AC-13, SMA-13 | In mass |
AC-XX refers to Asphalt mixtures. SMA-XX refers to Stone Mastic Asphalt mixtures. Surperpave refers to Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements.
Skid resistance of BOF slag asphalt mixtures with different gradation.
| Reference | Aggregate | Gradation | Indicators | Device | Results | JTG D50-2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xu [ | BOF | AC-13 | TD | SP | 0.64(13), 0.69(25) | BPN20 ≥ 45 |
| Wang [ | BOF | SMA-10 | TD | SP | 084 | |
| Niu [ | BOF | AC-13 | DF60 | DFT | 0.58(A), 0.57(S) | |
| Xue [ | BOF | SMA-13 | TD | SP | 0.8 | |
| Xie [ | BOF | AC-16C | TD | SP | 0.66, |
SP is Sand Patch test, BPT is British Pendulum tester, DFT is Dynamic Friction tester. JTG D50-2017 is Specifications for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavement in China.
Figure 5Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the steel slag and steel slag with asphalt interface. (a) The steel slag; (b) Steel slag–asphalt interface.
Figure 6Three-dimensional surface models of different steel slag micro-surfacing, (a) basalt used as coarse and fine aggregates; (b) coarse basalt aggregates and fine steel slag; (c) coarse steel slag aggregates and fine basalt aggregates are; (d) steel slag used as coarse and fine aggregates.