| Literature DB >> 31684050 |
Wenhuan Liu1,2, Hui Li3, Huimei Zhu4, Pinjing Xu5.
Abstract
Steel slag is an industrial solid waste with the largest output in the world. It has the characteristics of wear resistance, good particle shape, large porosity, etc. At the same time, it has good adhesion characteristics with asphalt. If steel slag is used in asphalt pavement, it not only solves the problem of insufficient quality aggregates in asphalt concrete, but can also give full play to the high hardness and high wear resistance of steel slag to improve the performance of asphalt pavement. In this study, a steel slag aggregate was mixed with road petroleum asphalt to prepare a permeable steel slag-asphalt mixture, which was then compared with the permeable limestone-asphalt mixture. According to the Technical Regulations for Permeable Asphalt Pavement (CJJT 190-2012), the permeability, water stability, and Marshall stability of the prepared asphalt mixtures were tested and analyzed. In addition, the high-temperature stability and expansibility were analyzed according to the Experimental Regulations for Highway Engineering Asphalt and Asphalt Mixture (JTG E20-2011). The chemical composition of the steel slag was tested and analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF). The mineral composition of the steel slag was tested and analyzed by X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The asphalt was analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results show that the steel slag asphalt permeable mixture had good permeability, water stability, and Marshall stability, as well as good high-temperature stability and a low expansion rate. The main mineral composition was ferroferric oxide, the RO phase (RO phase is a broad solid solution formed by melting FeO, MgO, and other divalent metal oxides such as MnO), dicalcium silicate, and tricalcium silicate. In the main chemical composition of steel slag, there was no chemical reaction between aluminum oxide, calcium oxide, silicon dioxide, and asphalt, while ferric oxide chemically reacted with asphalt and formed new organosilicon compounds. The main mineral composition of the steel slag (i.e., triiron tetroxide, dicalcium silicate, and tricalcium silicate) reacted chemically with the asphalt and produced new substances. There was no chemical reaction between the RO phase and asphalt.Entities:
Keywords: FTIR; asphalt; asphalt–steel slag interface; chemical reaction; steel slag
Year: 2019 PMID: 31684050 PMCID: PMC6862639 DOI: 10.3390/ma12213603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Test results of the permeability, water stability, and Marshall stability.
| Water Permeability | Water Stability | Marshall Stability | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume /mL | Time /s | coefficient of permeability /(mL/s) | Stability of 0.5h /kN | 48 h stability /kN | Residual degree of immersion /% | Marshall stability /kN | Flow value /mm | Void ratio /% |
| 400 | 6.6 | 60.61 | 9.12 | 8.27 | 90.68 | 9.12 | 23.3 | 19.64 |
Test results of the high temperature stability and expandability.
| High Temperature Stability | Expansibility | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic stability (60 °C, 1 h, Times /mm) | Initial volume /mm3 | Final volume /mm3 | Expansion rate /% |
| 6350 | 509235 | 511721 | 0.49 |
XRF test results of steel slag powder (wt%).
| CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | MnO | P2O5 | TiO2 | SO3 | Na2O | K2O | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.83 | 21.65 | 14.38 | 5.48 | 3.42 | 1.94 | 0.83 | 0.57 | 0.23 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 6.58 |
Mechanical properties of steel slag.
| Test Item | Measured Value | Technical Indicators | Normative References of the Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apparent relative density (g/cm3) | 3.39 | ≥2.90 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Water absorption (%) | 2.4 | ≤3.0 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Needle particle content (%) | 4.56 | ≤12 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Aggregate crushing value (%) | 13.9 | ≤26 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Water washing method <0.075 mm (%) | 0.2 | ≤1.0 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Los Angeles abrasion loss (%) | 13.2 | ≤26 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Incorruptibility (%) | 2.6 | ≤12 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Soaking expansion rate (%) | 1.2 | ≤2.0 | JTG E20-2011 |
| Adhesion to Asphalt (%) | 5 | ≥4 | JTG E20-2011 |
| f | 1.7 | ≤3.0 | JTG E20-2011 |
Figure 1FTIR test results of the asphalt–steel slag mixture.
FTIR peak wavenumbers of the asphalt–steel slag mixture.
| Sample | FTIR Peak Wavenumbers (cm−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asphalt | 3200 and 3700 | 2500~3200 | 2920 and 2850 | 2950 | 1560 and 1640 | 1460 and 1375 | 1400~1420 | 1030 and 1280 | 650~900 | 800 and 860 |
| Steel slag powder | 3200 and 3700 | 1300 and 1600 | 750~1200 | 750 and 500 | 400~500 | 3407 | 1430 | 921 | 710 | 500 |
Figure 2FTIR results of the chemical composition of the asphalt–steel slag mixture. (a) FTIR results of Asphalt-alumina mixture, (b) FTIR results of Asphalt-calcium oxide mixture, (c) FTIR results of Asphalt-ferric oxide mixture, (d) FTIR results of Asphalt-silica mixture.
Figure 3XRD test results of steel slag aggregate.
Figure 4FTIR test results of the steel slag mineral composition–asphalt mixture. (a) FTIR test results of Asphalt-ferroferric oxide mixture, (b) FTIR test results of Asphalt-dicalcium silicate mixture, (c) FTIR test results of Asphalt-calcium silicate mixture, (d) FTIR test results of Asphalt-RO phase mixture.
Figure 5Morphologies: (a) SEM of the steel–slag aggregate; (b) SEM of the asphalt–steel slag mineral composition mixture; (c) SEM of the steel slag–asphalt interface.