| Literature DB >> 32397099 |
Huanan Yu1,2,3, Wan Dai2, Guoping Qian1,2,3, Xiangbing Gong1,2,3, Dayao Zhou4, Xi Li1,2,3, Xinglin Zhou5.
Abstract
The NOx degradation performance of nano-TiO2 as a coating material for the road environment was evaluated in this research. The nano-TiO2 coating materials for both road surface and roadside were prepared by using anatase nano-TiO2, activated carbon powder, silane coupling agent and deionized water. The impact of varying amounts of coating material and silane coupling agent were evaluated. The road environment of NOx degradation was simulated by the photocatalytic test system designed by the research team. For the road surface coating, the photocatalytic degradation experiments of NO under different radiation intensities were carried out. The results show that the material has good photocatalytic degradation performance, and the proper amount of silane coupling agent can enhance the bonding performance of the material and asphalt mixture. For the roadside coating, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate was selected as the surfactant to carry out the photocatalytic degradation experiment of NO2 with different dosages of surfactant. The results showed that when the mass ratio of nano-TiO2 and surfactant was about 1:2, the catalytic degradation effect of the material was the best.Entities:
Keywords: NOx degradation; pavement coating; photocatalytic material; silane coupling agent
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397099 PMCID: PMC7279412 DOI: 10.3390/nano10050897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Research and experiment flowchart.
Technical indexes of VK-TA18 nano-TiO2.
| Properties | Results |
|---|---|
| Appearance | White power |
| Hydrophilic coefficient | 0.56 |
| Specific surface area (m2/g) | 60–120 |
| Drying weightlessness 105℃,2 h | ≤1.0% |
| Ignition loss | ≤1.0% |
| Purity | ≥99.8% |
| pH value | 8.1 |
| Crystal | Anatase |
Figure 2Overall structure of photocatalytic reaction test system; (a) external structure; (b) internal structure.
Figure 3Layout of measuring points (unit: mm).
Figure 4NO and NO2 concentration monitoring result.
Figure 5NO and NO2 concentration monitoring result.
Figure 6NO and NO2 concentration monitoring result.
Figure 7Test results of degradation with different amount of silane coupling agent.
Figure 8Consecutive degradation results of the same specimen.
Figure 9Degradation test results after cleaning.
Figure 10NO degradation test results under different irradiation intensity.
Figure 11Impact of coating amount on the pavement texture depth (TD).
Figure 12Degradation test results of NO2 with different surfactant dosage.