Literature DB >> 32396799

Stressed connections: cortisol levels following acute psychosocial stress disrupt affiliative mimicry in humans.

Jonas P Nitschke1, Cecile S Sunahara1, Evan W Carr2, Piotr Winkielman3,4, Jens C Pruessner5,6, Jennifer A Bartz1.   

Abstract

Mimicry, and especially spontaneous facial mimicry, is a rudimentary element of social-emotional experience that is well-conserved across numerous species. Although such mimicry is thought to be a relatively automatic process, research indicates that contextual factors can influence mimicry, especially in humans. Here, we extend this work by investigating the effect of acute psychosocial stress on spontaneous facial mimicry. Participants performed a spontaneous facial mimicry task with facial electromyography (fEMG) at baseline and approximately one month later, following an acute psychosocial stressor (Trier Social Stress Test). Results show that the magnitude of the endocrine stress response reduced zygomaticus major reactivity, and specifically spontaneous facial mimicry for positive social stimuli (i.e. smiles). Individuals with higher levels of the stress hormone cortisol showed a more blunted fEMG response to smiles, but not to frowns. Conversely, stress had no effect on corrugator supercilii activation (i.e. frowning to frowns). These findings highlight the importance of the biological stress response system in this basic element of social-emotional experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affiliation; cortisol; emotion; mimicry; social interaction; stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32396799      PMCID: PMC7287352          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  47 in total

1.  Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change.

Authors:  Jens C Pruessner; Clemens Kirschbaum; Gunther Meinlschmid; Dirk H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 2.  Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; John H Krystal
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03

Review 3.  Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons.

Authors:  Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion.

Authors:  Eliska Prochazkova; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Emotional mimicry as social regulation.

Authors:  Ursula Hess; Agneta Fischer
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-01-24

6.  Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items.

Authors:  Markus Brauer; John J Curtin
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-11-27

7.  Oxytocin selectively improves empathic accuracy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Bartz; Jamil Zaki; Niall Bolger; Eric Hollander; Natasha N Ludwig; Alexander Kolevzon; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-09-20

8.  Synthesis of a cortisol-biotin conjugate and evaluation as a tracer in an immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurement.

Authors:  R A Dressendörfer; C Kirschbaum; W Rohde; F Stahl; C J Strasburger
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.292

9.  An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety.

Authors:  Heather M Gray; Wendy Berry Mendes; Carrigan Denny-Brown
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

10.  Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  Dale J Barr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Altruism under Stress: Cortisol Negatively Predicts Charitable Giving and Neural Value Representations Depending on Mentalizing Capacity.

Authors:  Stefan Schulreich; Anita Tusche; Philipp Kanske; Lars Schwabe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.709

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.