| Literature DB >> 32395294 |
Fei Cui1, Ke Xu1, Hengrui Liang1, Wenhua Liang1, Jingpei Li1, Wei Wang1, Hui Liu2, Jun Liu1, Jianxing He1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the evolution and adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), options for anesthesia control have also seen major developments. Intubated anesthesia with single lung mechanical ventilation VATS (MV-VATS) is considered the standard of care in VATS. However, this type of ventilation strategy has been associated with several adverse effects, which can trigger complications and increase the overall surgical risk. In order to avoid intubated anesthesia related adverse effects, non-intubated spontaneous ventilation VATS (SV-VATS) strategies have been proposed in recent years and widely applied.Entities:
Keywords: Spontaneous ventilation; randomized controlled trial; spontaneous pneumothorax; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32395294 PMCID: PMC7212161 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Figure 1Schematic outline of the trial design. CT, computed tomography; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score standard; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists score; BMI, body mass index. MV-VATS, mechanical ventilation VATS; SV-VATS, spontaneous ventilation VATS.
Anesthesia effect score
| Scores | Anesthesia effects |
|---|---|
| 4 | Complete, painless and quiet anesthesia, providing good conditions for surgery, and hemodynamics remains relatively stable |
| 3 | Slightly incomplete anesthesia with mild pain, not very good muscle relaxation, sedative is needed, and fluctuating hemodynamics (not caused by the disease) are observed |
| 2 | Incomplete anesthesia with obvious pain, moan and inciting, and the situation is improved after the medication, but it is not ideal, and barely for operation performance |
| 1 | Anesthesia conversion is required for surgery performance |
Consciousness level
| Degree | Consciousness level |
|---|---|
| 0 | The patient is asleep and no response to calling |
| 1 | The patient is asleep, body movements or blinking, head and neck movements are presented when calling |
| 2 | The patient is awake and has a level 1 performance, can open mouth and stick out tongue |
| 3 | The patient is awake and has a level 2 performance and can tell his/her age or name |
| 4 | The patient is awake and has a level 3 performance and can recognize the people around or know where he/she is |
The grades of surgical exposure
| Grades | Surgical field exposure and lung collapse |
|---|---|
| 5 | A clear surgical field exposure, a satisfactory lung collapse |
| 4 | A less clearly surgical field exposure, a fine lung collapse, no intermittent surgery is needed |
| 3 | A fine surgical field exposure, an unsatisfactory lung collapse, intermittent surgery to adjust anesthesia indicators such as tidal volume is needed |
| 2 | A poor surgical field exposure, an unsatisfactory lung collapse, intermittent surgery is needed in most cases |
| 1 | A very poor surgical field exposure that is unable to perform surgery, conversion to endotracheal intubation is needed |
Steward score
| Criteria of Steward score | Score |
|---|---|
| Level of awake | |
| Fully awake | 2 |
| Response to stimulation | 1 |
| No response to stimulation | 0 |
| Degree of airway patency | |
| Can be coughed according to the doctor’s instructions | 2 |
| Self-airway patency maintenance without auxiliary support | 1 |
| Auxiliary support is required for airway patency maintenance | 0 |
| Degree of limb activity | |
| Consciously limb activity | 2 |
| Unconscious limb activity | 1 |
| No limb activity | 0 |