Literature DB >> 27165771

The impact of non-intubated versus intubated anaesthesia on early outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Jun Liu1,2, Fei Cui1,2, Eugenio Pompeo3, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas4,5, Hanzhang Chen1,2, Weiqiang Yin1,2, Wenlong Shao1,2, Shuben Li1,2, Hui Pan1,2, Jianfei Shen1,2, Lindsey Hamblin1,2, Jianxing He6,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To comparatively assess the impact of non-intubated intravenous anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation (NIIASV) versus intubated anaesthesia with single-lung mechanical ventilation (IASLV) on early outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) anatomical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: A total of 339 patients with NSCLC undergoing VATS anatomical resection (282 lobectomies and 57 segmentectomies) between December 2011 and December 2014 were included for analysis and divided into two groups according to anaesthesia type: NIIASV (151 patients) and IASLV (188 patients). Comprehensive early outcome data including intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between subgroups. Propensity score matching was used to control for selection bias due to non-random group assignment in a 1:1 manner, resulting in 136 pairs (20 for segmentectomy and 116 for lobectomy) with balanced baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: The NIIASV procedure was completed uneventfully in all 32 patients undergoing segmentectomy and in 119 lobectomy patients undergoing lobectomy, whereas 9 lobectomy patients required conversion to IASLV. These 9 cases were excluded from the comparative analysis. Comparisons between NIIASV and IASLV results showed no intergroup differences in demographics, baseline data, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes and duration of chest tube dwell time. Conversely, significantly better results occurred in the NIIASV group in postoperative fasting time (P < 0.001), overall postoperative chest drainage volume (P < 0.04) and hospital stay (P < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, VATS anatomical resection for NSCLC patients is feasible under NIIASV. Perioperative data comparisons with IASLV have shown that postoperative fasting time, overall drainage volume and hospital stay were significantly better with NIIASV, suggesting a more rapid recovery. Further investigation is warranted to assess the long-term effects and survival of this promising globally less invasive surgical strategy.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intravenous anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation; Lobectomy; Lymph node dissection; NSCLC; Non-intubated VATS; Non-intubated thoracic surgery; Segmentectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27165771     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  29 in total

1.  Simple to simplest: the tubeless technique.

Authors:  Jingpei Li; Jun Liu; Lindsey Hamblin; Hui Liu; Lixia Liang; Qinglong Dong; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Minimally invasive thoracic surgery: beyond surgical access.

Authors:  Max K H Wong; Alva K Y Sit; Timmy W K Au
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Anaesthesiology for uniportal VATS: double lumen, single lumen and tubeless.

Authors:  Ze-Rui Zhao; Rainbow W H Lau; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-08-21

4.  Uniportal non-intubated thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Benedetta Bedetti; Davide Patrini; Luca Bertolaccini; Roberto Crisci; Piergiorgio Solli; Joachim Schmidt; Marco Scarci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-18

5.  Expert consensus on spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in primary spontaneous pneumothorax (Guangzhou).

Authors:  Jianxing He; Jun Liu; Chengchu Zhu; Tianyang Dai; Kaican Cai; Zhifeng Zhang; Chao Cheng; Kun Qiao; Xiang Liu; Guangsuo Wang; Shun Xu; Rusong Yang; Junqiang Fan; Hecheng Li; Jiang Jin; Qinglong Dong; Lixia Liang; Jinfeng Ding; Kaiming He; Yulin Liu; Jing Ye; Siyang Feng; Yu Jiang; Haoda Huang; Huankai Zhang; Zhenguo Liu; Xia Feng; Zhaohua Xia; Mingfei Ma; Zhongxin Duan; Tonghai Huang; Yali Li; Qiming Shen; Wenfei Tan; Hong Ma; Yang Sun; Congcong Chen; Fei Cui; Wei Wang; Jingpei Li; Zhexue Hao; Hui Liu; Wenhua Liang; Xusen Zou; Hengrui Liang; Hanyu Yang; Yingfen Li; Shunjun Jiang; Calvin S H Ng; Diego González-Rivas; Eugenio Pompeo; Raja M Flores; Yaron Shargall; Mahmoud Ismail; Benedetta Bedetti; Ahmed G Elkhouly; Keng Ang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

6.  Non-intubated single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery: a two-center cohort of 188 patients.

Authors:  Man-Ling Wang; Carlos Galvez; Jin-Shing Chen; Jose Navarro-Martinez; Sergio Bolufer; Ming-Hui Hung; Hsao-Hsung Hsu; Ya-Jung Cheng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Tubeless major pulmonary resections.

Authors:  Francisco Lirio; Carlos Galvez; Sergio Bolufer; Juan Manuel Corcoles; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Tubeless thoracic surgery: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Piergiorgio Solli; Jury Brandolini; Luca Bertolaccini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,684 cases.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Hui-Guo Chen; Wei-Bin Wu; Xiao-Jun Li; Yong-Hui Wu; Jian-Nan Xu; Yu-Bin Jia; Jian Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Comparison of non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Zeead M AlGhamdi; Lyfuxu Lynhiavu; Young Kyu Moon; Mi Hyoung Moon; Seha Ahn; Yunho Kim; Sook Whan Sung
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.