| Literature DB >> 32393799 |
Christopher M Haggerty1,2, Brandon K Fornwalt3,4,5, Sushravya Raghunath1, Alvaro E Ulloa Cerna1, Linyuan Jing1, David P vanMaanen1, Joshua Stough1,6, Dustin N Hartzel7, Joseph B Leader7, H Lester Kirchner8, Martin C Stumpe9, Ashraf Hafez9, Arun Nemani9, Tanner Carbonati9, Kipp W Johnson9, Katelyn Young10, Christopher W Good2, John M Pfeifer11, Aalpen A Patel12, Brian P Delisle13, Amro Alsaid2, Dominik Beer2.
Abstract
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widely used medical test, consisting of voltage versus time traces collected from surface recordings over the heart1. Here we hypothesized that a deep neural network (DNN) can predict an important future clinical event, 1-year all-cause mortality, from ECG voltage-time traces. By using ECGs collected over a 34-year period in a large regional health system, we trained a DNN with 1,169,662 12-lead resting ECGs obtained from 253,397 patients, in which 99,371 events occurred. The model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 on a held-out test set of 168,914 patients, in which 14,207 events occurred. Even within the large subset of patients (n = 45,285) with ECGs interpreted as 'normal' by a physician, the performance of the model in predicting 1-year mortality remained high (AUC = 0.85). A blinded survey of cardiologists demonstrated that many of the discriminating features of these normal ECGs were not apparent to expert reviewers. Finally, a Cox proportional-hazard model revealed a hazard ratio of 9.5 (P < 0.005) for the two predicted groups (dead versus alive 1 year after ECG) over a 25-year follow-up period. These results show that deep learning can add substantial prognostic information to the interpretation of 12-lead resting ECGs, even in cases that are interpreted as normal by physicians.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32393799 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0870-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440