Wenke Hwang1, Jongwha Chang, Michelle Laclair, Harold Paz. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Health Services Research, Penn State University College of Medicine, 600 Centerview Dr, Ste 2200, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. WHwang@phs.psu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the current literature to assess the association between integrated healthcare delivery systems and changes in cost and quality. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Academic Search Premier, and reference lists were used to retrieve peer-reviewed articles reporting outcomes (cost and quality) related to integrated delivery systems. A general Internet search and reference lists were used to retrieve non-peer reviewed publications meeting the same criteria. Included peer and non-peer reviewed publications were based in the United States and were published between the years 2000 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 21 peer-reviewed articles and 4 non-peer reviewed manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. Twenty studies showed an association between increased integration in healthcare delivery and an increase in the quality of care. One study reported no changes in quality indicators associated with increased integration. None of these studies measured cost reduction directly, but used reduction in utilization of services instead. Four studies associated decreases in the utilization of services with increases in integration. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of studies we reviewed have shown that integrated delivery systems have positive effects on quality of care. Few studies linked use of an integrated delivery system to lower health service utilization. Only 1 study reported some small cost savings.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the current literature to assess the association between integrated healthcare delivery systems and changes in cost and quality. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, Academic Search Premier, and reference lists were used to retrieve peer-reviewed articles reporting outcomes (cost and quality) related to integrated delivery systems. A general Internet search and reference lists were used to retrieve non-peer reviewed publications meeting the same criteria. Included peer and non-peer reviewed publications were based in the United States and were published between the years 2000 and 2011. RESULTS: A total of 21 peer-reviewed articles and 4 non-peer reviewed manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. Twenty studies showed an association between increased integration in healthcare delivery and an increase in the quality of care. One study reported no changes in quality indicators associated with increased integration. None of these studies measured cost reduction directly, but used reduction in utilization of services instead. Four studies associated decreases in the utilization of services with increases in integration. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of studies we reviewed have shown that integrated delivery systems have positive effects on quality of care. Few studies linked use of an integrated delivery system to lower health service utilization. Only 1 study reported some small cost savings.
Authors: Scott M Glaser; Ronny Kalash; Dante R Bongiorni; Mark S Roberts; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Bruce L Jacobs; Sushil Beriwal; Dwight E Heron; Joel S Greenberger Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Justin W Timbie; Ashley M Kranz; Maria DeYoreo; Blen Eshete-Roesler; Marc N Elliott; José J Escarce; Mark E Totten; Cheryl L Damberg Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ashley M Kranz; Maria DeYoreo; Blen Eshete-Roesler; Cheryl L Damberg; Mark Totten; José J Escarce; Justin W Timbie Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Parth K Modi; Lindsey A Herrel; Samuel R Kaufman; Phyllis Yan; Tudor Borza; Ted A Skolarus; Florian R Schroeck; Brent K Hollenbeck; Vahakn B Shahinian Journal: Urology Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Christopher M Haggerty; Brandon K Fornwalt; Sushravya Raghunath; Alvaro E Ulloa Cerna; Linyuan Jing; David P vanMaanen; Joshua Stough; Dustin N Hartzel; Joseph B Leader; H Lester Kirchner; Martin C Stumpe; Ashraf Hafez; Arun Nemani; Tanner Carbonati; Kipp W Johnson; Katelyn Young; Christopher W Good; John M Pfeifer; Aalpen A Patel; Brian P Delisle; Amro Alsaid; Dominik Beer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ekaterina Anderson; Amanda K Solch; B Graeme Fincke; Mark Meterko; Jolie B Wormwood; Varsha G Vimalananda Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 5.128