Joy Melnikow1, Ethan Evans2, Guibo Xing3, Shauna Durbin3, Dominique Ritley3, Brock Daniels4, Lindsey Woodworth5. 1. Center for Healthcare for Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, California jamelnikow@ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Social Work, California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, California. 3. Center for Healthcare for Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, California. 4. Division of Emergency Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 5. Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We undertook a study to evaluate variation in the availability of primary care new patient appointments for Medi-Cal (California Medicaid) enrollees in Northern California, and its relationship to emergency department (ED) use after Medicaid expansion. METHODS: We placed simulated calls by purported Medi-Cal enrollees to 581 primary care clinicians (PCCs) listed as accepting new patients in online directories of Medi-Cal managed care plans. Data from the California Health Interview Survey, Medi-Cal enrollment reports, and California hospital discharge records were used in analyses. We developed multilevel, mixed-effect models to evaluate variation in appointment access. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between primary care access and ED use by county. RESULTS: Availability of PCC new patient appointments to Medi-Cal enrollees lacking a PCC varied significantly across counties in the multilevel model, ranging from 77 enrollees (95% CI, 70-81) to 472 enrollees (95% CI, 378-628) per each available new patient appointment. Just 19% of PCCs had available appointments within the state-mandated 10 business days. Clinicians at Federally Qualified Health Centers had higher availability of new patient appointments (rate ratio = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.24-1.97). Counties with poorer PCC access had higher ED use by Medi-Cal enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to findings from other states, access to primary care in Northern California was limited for new patient Medi-Cal enrollees and varied across counties, despite standard statewide reimbursement rates. Counties with more limited access to primary care new patient appointments had higher ED use by Medi-Cal enrollees.
PURPOSE: We undertook a study to evaluate variation in the availability of primary care new patient appointments for Medi-Cal (California Medicaid) enrollees in Northern California, and its relationship to emergency department (ED) use after Medicaid expansion. METHODS: We placed simulated calls by purported Medi-Cal enrollees to 581 primary care clinicians (PCCs) listed as accepting new patients in online directories of Medi-Cal managed care plans. Data from the California Health Interview Survey, Medi-Cal enrollment reports, and California hospital discharge records were used in analyses. We developed multilevel, mixed-effect models to evaluate variation in appointment access. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between primary care access and ED use by county. RESULTS: Availability of PCC new patient appointments to Medi-Cal enrollees lacking a PCC varied significantly across counties in the multilevel model, ranging from 77 enrollees (95% CI, 70-81) to 472 enrollees (95% CI, 378-628) per each available new patient appointment. Just 19% of PCCs had available appointments within the state-mandated 10 business days. Clinicians at Federally Qualified Health Centers had higher availability of new patient appointments (rate ratio = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.24-1.97). Counties with poorer PCC access had higher ED use by Medi-Cal enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to findings from other states, access to primary care in Northern California was limited for new patient Medi-Cal enrollees and varied across counties, despite standard statewide reimbursement rates. Counties with more limited access to primary care new patient appointments had higher ED use by Medi-Cal enrollees.
Keywords:
Medicaid expansion; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; United States; barriers; health; health services accessibility; insurance; national health insurance; practice-based research; primary care access; secret shopper; simulated patient; vulnerable populations
Authors: Daniel Polsky; Michael Richards; Simon Basseyn; Douglas Wissoker; Genevieve M Kenney; Stephen Zuckerman; Karin V Rhodes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer E Devoe; Alia Baez; Heather Angier; Lisa Krois; Christine Edlund; Patricia A Carney Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Karin V Rhodes; Simon Basseyn; Ari B Friedman; Genevieve M Kenney; Douglas Wissoker; Daniel Polsky Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Safyer McKenzie-Sampson; Rebecca J Baer; Bridgette E Blebu; Deborah Karasek; Scott P Oltman; Matthew S Pantell; Larry Rand; Elizabeth E Rogers; Jacqueline M Torres; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Karen A Scott; Brittany D Chambers Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 3.225