Michael R Richards1, Brendan Saloner, Genevieve M Kenney, Karin Rhodes, Daniel Polsky. 1. *Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics †Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholar, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA ‡Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington DC §Center for Emergency Care Policy & Research ∥Perelman School of Medicine ¶Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a vital source of primary care for underserved populations, such as Medicaid enrollees and the uninsured. Their role in delivering care may increase through new funding allocations in the Affordable Care Act and expanded Medicaid programs across many states. OBJECTIVE: Examine differences in appointment availability and wait-times for new patient visits between FQHCs and other providers. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use experimental data from a simulated patient study to compare new patient appointment rates across FQHC and non-FQHC practices for 3 insurance types (private, Medicaid, and self-pay). Trained auditors, posing as patients requesting the first available new patient appointment, were randomized to call primary care providers in 10 states in late 2012 and early 2013. Multivariate regression models adjust for caller-level, clinic-level, and area-level variables. STUDY SETTING: The sample comprises 10,904 calls, including 544 calls to FQHCs. RESULTS: FQHCs grant new patient appointments at high rates, irrespective of patient insurance status. Adjusting for caller, clinic, and area variables, the Medicaid appointment rate at FQHCs is 22 percentage points higher than other primary care practices. Although the appointment rate difference between FQHCs and non-FQHCs is somewhat smaller for the self-pay group, FQHCs are much more likely to provide a lower-cost visit to these patients. Conditional on receiving an appointment, wait-times at FQHCs are comparable with other providers. CONCLUSION: FQHCs' greater willingness to accept new underserved patients before 2014 underscores their potential key roles as health reform proceeds.
BACKGROUND: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a vital source of primary care for underserved populations, such as Medicaid enrollees and the uninsured. Their role in delivering care may increase through new funding allocations in the Affordable Care Act and expanded Medicaid programs across many states. OBJECTIVE: Examine differences in appointment availability and wait-times for new patient visits between FQHCs and other providers. RESEARCH DESIGN: We use experimental data from a simulated patient study to compare new patient appointment rates across FQHC and non-FQHC practices for 3 insurance types (private, Medicaid, and self-pay). Trained auditors, posing as patients requesting the first available new patient appointment, were randomized to call primary care providers in 10 states in late 2012 and early 2013. Multivariate regression models adjust for caller-level, clinic-level, and area-level variables. STUDY SETTING: The sample comprises 10,904 calls, including 544 calls to FQHCs. RESULTS: FQHCs grant new patient appointments at high rates, irrespective of patient insurance status. Adjusting for caller, clinic, and area variables, the Medicaid appointment rate at FQHCs is 22 percentage points higher than other primary care practices. Although the appointment rate difference between FQHCs and non-FQHCs is somewhat smaller for the self-pay group, FQHCs are much more likely to provide a lower-cost visit to these patients. Conditional on receiving an appointment, wait-times at FQHCs are comparable with other providers. CONCLUSION: FQHCs' greater willingness to accept new underserved patients before 2014 underscores their potential key roles as health reform proceeds.
Authors: Brendan Saloner; Adam S Wilk; Douglas Wissoker; Molly Candon; Katherine Hempstead; Karin V Rhodes; Daniel E Polsky; Genevieve M Kenney Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Brigit Hatch; Steffani R Bailey; Stuart Cowburn; Miguel Marino; Heather Angier; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Hilary Barnes; Claudia B Maier; Danielle Altares Sarik; Hayley Drew Germack; Linda H Aiken; Matthew D McHugh Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Michael R Richards; Brendan Saloner; Genevieve M Kenney; Karin V Rhodes; Daniel Polsky Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Craig Evan Pollack; Michelle E Ross; Katrina Armstrong; Charles C Branas; Karin V Rhodes; Justin E Bekelman; Alicia Wentz; Christian Stillson; Archana Radhakrishnan; Enny Oyeniran; David Grande Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pooja A Lagisetty; Nathaniel Healy; Claire Garpestad; Mary Jannausch; Renuka Tipirneni; Amy S B Bohnert Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-07-03