Benjamin F Crabtree1,2, William L Miller3, Jenna Howard4, Ellen B Rubinstein5, Jennifer Tsui2, Shawna V Hudson4,2, Denalee O'Malley4,2, Jeanne M Ferrante4,2, Kurt C Stange6. 1. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey benjamin.crabtree@rutgers.edu. 2. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 3. Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania. 4. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 5. North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota. 6. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite a burgeoning population of cancer survivors and pending shortages of oncology services, clear definitions and systematic approaches for engaging primary care in cancer survivorship are lacking. We sought to understand how primary care clinicians perceive their role in delivering care to cancer survivors. METHODS: We conducted digitally recorded interviews with 38 clinicians in 14 primary care practices that had national reputations as workforce innovators. Interviews took place during intense case study data collection and explored clinicians' perspectives regarding their role in cancer survivorship care. We analyzed verbatim transcripts using an inductive and iterative immersion-crystallization process. RESULTS: Divergent views exist regarding primary care's role in cancer survivor care with a lack of coherence about the concept of survivorship. A few clinicians believed any follow-up care after acute cancer treatment was oncology's responsibility; however, most felt cancer survivor care was within their purview. Some primary care clinicians considered cancer survivors as a distinct population; others felt cancer survivors were like any other patient with a chronic disease. In further interpretative analysis, we discovered a deeply ingrained philosophy of whole-person care that creates a professional identity dilemma for primary care clinicians when faced with rapidly changing specialized knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This study exposes an emerging identity crisis for primary care that goes beyond cancer survivorship care. Facilitated national conversations might help specialists and primary care develop knowledge translation platforms to support the prioritizing, integrating, and personalizing functions of primary care for patients with highly complicated issues requiring specialized knowledge.
PURPOSE: Despite a burgeoning population of cancer survivors and pending shortages of oncology services, clear definitions and systematic approaches for engaging primary care in cancer survivorship are lacking. We sought to understand how primary care clinicians perceive their role in delivering care to cancer survivors. METHODS: We conducted digitally recorded interviews with 38 clinicians in 14 primary care practices that had national reputations as workforce innovators. Interviews took place during intense case study data collection and explored clinicians' perspectives regarding their role in cancer survivorship care. We analyzed verbatim transcripts using an inductive and iterative immersion-crystallization process. RESULTS: Divergent views exist regarding primary care's role in cancer survivor care with a lack of coherence about the concept of survivorship. A few clinicians believed any follow-up care after acute cancer treatment was oncology's responsibility; however, most felt cancer survivor care was within their purview. Some primary care clinicians considered cancer survivors as a distinct population; others felt cancer survivors were like any other patient with a chronic disease. In further interpretative analysis, we discovered a deeply ingrained philosophy of whole-person care that creates a professional identity dilemma for primary care clinicians when faced with rapidly changing specialized knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This study exposes an emerging identity crisis for primary care that goes beyond cancer survivorship care. Facilitated national conversations might help specialists and primary care develop knowledge translation platforms to support the prioritizing, integrating, and personalizing functions of primary care for patients with highly complicated issues requiring specialized knowledge.
Authors: Jennifer Tsui; Shawna V Hudson; Ellen B Rubinstein; Jenna Howard; Elisabeth Hicks; Autumn Kieber-Emmons; Alicja Bator; Heather S Lee; Jeanne Ferrante; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Ellen B Rubinstein; William L Miller; Shawna V Hudson; Jenna Howard; Denalee O'Malley; Jennifer Tsui; Heather Sophia Lee; Alicja Bator; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Kurt C Stange; Rebecca S Etz; Heidi Gullett; Sarah A Sweeney; William L Miller; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; Russell E Glasgow Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2014 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Edward H Wagner; Margaret Flinter; Clarissa Hsu; DeAnn Cromp; Brian T Austin; Rebecca Etz; Benjamin F Crabtree; MaryJoan D Ladden Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Autumn M Kieber-Emmons; William L Miller; Ellen B Rubinstein; Jenna Howard; Jennifer Tsui; Jennifer L Rankin; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Mix Methods Res Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Angela B Mariotto; Lindsey Enewold; Helen Parsons; Christopher A Zeruto; K Robin Yabroff; Deborah K Mayer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Deanna J Attai; Matthew S Katz; Elani Streja; Jui-Ting Hsiung; Maria V Marroquin; Beverly A Zavaleta; Larissa Nekhlyudov Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Youngjee Choi; Elaina Parrillo; Jennifer Wenzel; Victoria F Grabinski; Aamna Kabani; Kimberly S Peairs Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 4.442