| Literature DB >> 29800396 |
Jennifer Tsui1, Shawna V Hudson1,2, Ellen B Rubinstein2, Jenna Howard2, Elisabeth Hicks3, Autumn Kieber-Emmons4, Alicja Bator2, Heather S Lee2, Jeanne Ferrante2, Benjamin F Crabtree1,2.
Abstract
There are currently 15.5 million cancer survivors in USA who are increasingly relying on primary care providers for their care. Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) have the potential to meet the unique needs of cancer survivors; but, few studies have examined PCMH attributes as potential resources for delivering survivorship care. This study assesses the current care coordination infrastructure in advanced PCMHs, known to be innovative, and explores their capacity to provide cancer survivorship care. We conducted comparative case studies of a purposive sample (n = 9) of PCMHs to examine current care coordination infrastructure and capacity through a mixed- methods analysis. Data included qualitative interviews, quantitative surveys, and fieldnotes collected during 10- to 12-day onsite observations at each practice. Case studies included practices in five states with diverse business models and settings. Eight of the nine practices had National Committee for Quality Assurance Level 3 PCMH recognition. No practices had implemented a systematic approach to cancer survivorship care. We found all practices had a range of electronic population health management tools, care coordinator roles in place for chronic conditions, and strategies or protocols for tracking and managing complex disease groups. We identified potential capacity, as well as barriers, to provide cancer survivorship care using existing care coordination infrastructure developed for other chronic conditions. This existing infrastructure suggests the potential to translate care coordination elements within primary care settings to accelerate the implementation of systematic survivorship care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29800396 PMCID: PMC6454454 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Behav Med ISSN: 1613-9860 Impact factor: 3.046