Heng Zhang1, Gang Shan2, Jukun Song3, Ye Tian2, Ling-Yue An4, Yong Ban2, Guang-Heng Luo1,2. 1. Medical School of Guizhou University, Jiaxiu South road, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, P.R. China. 2. Department of Urology Surgery, Guizhou Province People's Hospital, No. 83 East Zhongshan Road, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, P.R. China. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, No. 83 East Zhongshan Road, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, P.R. China. 4. Guangzhou Medical University, New town, Panyu district, Guangzhou Province, P.R. China.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the world. Bladder cancer can be roughly divided into muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The aim of the present study was to identify the key genes and pathways associated with the progression of NMIBC to MIBC and to further analyze its molecular mechanism and prognostic significance. We analyzed microarray data of NMIBC and MIBC gene expression datasets (GSE31684) listed in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. After the dataset was analyzed using R software, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of NMIBC and MIBC were identified. These DEGs were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment, KOBAS-Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis. The effect of these hub genes on the survival of bladder cancer patients was analyzed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A total of 389 DEGs were obtained, of which 270 were up-regulated and 119 down-regulated. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs were mainly involved in the pathway of protein digestion and absorption, extracellular matrix (ECM) receiver interaction, phantom, toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway, focal adhesion, NF-κB signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and other signaling pathways. Top five hub genes COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, and COL12A1 may be involved in the development of MIBC. These results may provide us with a further understanding of the occurrence and development of MIBC, as well as new targets for the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC in the future.
Bladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the world. Bladder cancer can be roughly divided into muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The aim of the present study was to identify the key genes and pathways associated with the progression of NMIBC to MIBC and to further analyze its molecular mechanism and prognostic significance. We analyzed microarray data of NMIBC and MIBC gene expression datasets (GSE31684) listed in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. After the dataset was analyzed using R software, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of NMIBC and MIBC were identified. These DEGs were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment, KOBAS-Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis. The effect of these hub genes on the survival of bladder cancerpatients was analyzed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A total of 389 DEGs were obtained, of which 270 were up-regulated and 119 down-regulated. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs were mainly involved in the pathway of protein digestion and absorption, extracellular matrix (ECM) receiver interaction, phantom, toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway, focal adhesion, NF-κB signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and other signaling pathways. Top five hub genes COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, and COL12A1 may be involved in the development of MIBC. These results may provide us with a further understanding of the occurrence and development of MIBC, as well as new targets for the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC in the future.
Bladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the world, causing 3.2 deaths per 100000 males and 0.9 deaths per 100000 females every year [1]. Bladder cancer can be roughly divided into muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) depending on whether it infiltrates the bladder muscle layer or not. Approximately 75% of bladder cancerpatients have NMIBC, which has a better prognosis than MIBC [2]. The treatment for NMIBC is a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) plus bladder drug perfusion, but the first choice for MIBC is radical cystectomy (RC) [3]. It is apparent that muscle invasion in bladder cancerpatients has an important impact on determining the appropriate treatment plan and prognosis. At present, there are some theories about the molecular mechanisms involved in NMIBC progression, including oncogene activation [4], immune regulation [5], and extracellular matrix (ECM) alterations [6,7].In recent years, gene expression chip technology, which has been widely used in oncology research, has been used to explore the gene expression profile of tumor cells more completely, and this biological information is of great significance for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the tumor [8]. With the wide application of gene expression arrays, more and more chip data are being published in public databases, and the data integration and mining of these public databases can help us understand the changes occurring in a tumor at a deeper level.In the present paper, a microarray dataset of gene expression profiles (GSE31684) was accessed. After the dataset was analyzed using R software, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of NMIBC and MIBC were identified. These DEGs were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment, KOBAS-Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, and protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis. The effect of these hub genes on the survival of bladder cancerpatients was analyzed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Based on the above analysis, we have obtained the DEGs related to the occurrence and development of bladder cancer muscle invasion. In the present paper, we discuss the cell biological functions, biological signal pathways, and the interaction networks of the encoded proteins involved in these DEGs, so as to provide new ideas and possible diagnostic and treatment targets of bioinformatics-related changes involved in the occurrence and development of bladder cancer.
Materials and methods
Microarray data
NMIBC and MIBC gene expression datasets GSE31684 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). GSE31684 has a total of 15 NMIBC samples and 78 MIBC samples (platform: gpl570, [hg-u133_plus_] Affymetrix human genome U133 Plus 2.0 array) [9]. The clinicopathologic characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
Data processing
The downloaded dataset was analyzed and searched for DEGs using R software 3.4.0 (https://www.r-project.org/). The ID corresponding to the probe name was converted into the gene symbol and saved in the txt file. The limma package for bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org/) was used to analyze the progressive gene differential expression between NMIBC and MIBC. The conditions were set as P<0.05, log fold change (FC) > 1. TXT text results were retained for subsequent analysis.
Functional and pathway enrichment analysis
The online gene annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery bioinformation resource database (DAVID, Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery; https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) released in 2003 contains a complete high levels of evidence biological database and a comprehensive analysis tools for systematic and integrative annotation and enrichment analysis that can be used to reveal biological meaning related to large gene lists. We used DAVID to analyze the function and pathway enrichment of the obtained DEGs. GO enrichment analysis was carried out on the webpage using DAVID’s online tools, including biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), and cell component (CC). In addition, GO full analysis was carried out using Cytoscape’s bioapplication program. KEGG path analysis was also carried out on the web using DAVID’s online tools. All the above results were displayed with P<0.05.
PPI network generation and module analysis
Using the STRING database (http://string-db.org/) for PPI network analysis, each point represents a gene, protein, or molecule, and the connection between points represents the interaction between the two molecules. The results in this database are obtained from experimental data, databases, text mining, and predictive bioinformatics data. This type of analysis can show the molecular action and pathway relationship of the DEGs involved in progression from NMIBC to MIBC. However, the gene represented by the central point may be the key protein or candidate gene with important physiological regulatory function. The results of PPI network analysis of hub genes were analyzed using the cytoHubba application of Cytoscape and sorted according to the scores.
Validation and overall survival analysis of the target genes in TCGA
TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) was used to verify the expression of the top five hub genes, and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare the impact of these expressed genes on overall survival.
Results
Microarray data information and identification of DEGs in MIBC
The dataset GSE31684 of NMIBC and MIBC tissue gene expression profiles was normalized using the Affy package Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) method. After difference analysis of the GSE31684 dataset using the limma package, a total of 389 DEGs were obtained; the difference expression volcano map of two different tissue samples in the dataset is shown in Figure 1, and the heat map is shown in Figure 2. Among them, 270 genes were up-regulated and 119 were down-regulated (Table 1).
Figure 1
Differential expression of data between two sets of samples
The red points represent up-regulated and down-regulated genes screened on the basis of |FC| > 2.0 and a corrected P-value of <0.05. The black points represent genes with no significant difference.
Figure 2
Hierarchical clustering heatmap of DEGs screened on the basis of |FC| > 2.0 and a corrected P-value <0.05
Differential expression of data between two sets of samples
The red points represent up-regulated and down-regulated genes screened on the basis of |FC| > 2.0 and a corrected P-value of <0.05. The black points represent genes with no significant difference.
GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs
Using the online analytical tool of DAVID to annotate the DEGs obtained from microarray data integration analysis, the GO function of the DEGs was enriched with a P-value <0.05. In GO enrichment analysis, DEGs were divided into three parts: BP, MF, and CC. The statistical results of GO enrichment analysis are shown in Figure 3. In the BP group, DEGs were mainly enriched in ECM formation, collagen synthesis and metabolism, cell adhesion, inflammatory response, and other functions. In the MF group, DEGs were mainly enriched in ECM formation, heparin binding, collagen binding, and other MFs. In the CC group, DEGs were mainly enriched in extracellular region, intracellular space, and exosomes. The GO full analysis is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3
GO enrichment analysis of DEGs on the −log10(P-value)
MF for green bar, CC for gray bar, BP for blue bar.
Figure 4
Directed acyclic graph based on the enrichment degree of GO terms
Color depth represents the degree of GO terms enrichment.
GO enrichment analysis of DEGs on the −log10(P-value)
MF for green bar, CC for gray bar, BP for blue bar.
Directed acyclic graph based on the enrichment degree of GO terms
Color depth represents the degree of GO terms enrichment.
KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs
Using the DAVID online analysis tool to analyze the KEGG signal pathway enrichment of the DEGs obtained from microarray data integration analysis, we found that the main enrichment of DEGs was in protein digestion and absorption, ECM receiver interaction, phantom, toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway, focal adhesion, NF-κB signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and other signaling pathways. The results are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5
KEGG signal pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs on the −log10(P-value) (blue bar) and gene count (orange line)
PPI network construction and cytoHubba analysis
The proteins expressed by the DEGs, 389 in total, were analyzed in the PPI network using the STRING database (http://string-db.org), and the PPI network formed by them is shown in Figure 6. The top ten hub genes were screened and ranked (COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, COL12a1, FBN1, COL5a2, COL6a3, COL6a2, and FN1) using cytoHubba. The scoring results are shown in Table 2. The interaction network of these hub genes is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 6
PPI network
Circles represent genes, lines represent the interaction of proteins between genes, and the results within the circle represent the structure of proteins. Line color represents evidence of the interaction between the proteins.
Table 2
Top ten in PPI network ranked by MCC method
Rank
Name
Score
1
COL1A2
3.08E+08
2
COL3A1
3.08E+08
3
COL5A1
2.96E+08
4
POSTN
2.68E+08
5
COL12A1
2.55E+08
6
FBN1
2.53E+08
7
COL5A2
2.52E+08
8
COL6A3
2.51E+08
9
COL6A2
2.51E+08
10
FN1
2.21E+08
Figure 7
The interaction network of top ten hub genes
PPI network
Circles represent genes, lines represent the interaction of proteins between genes, and the results within the circle represent the structure of proteins. Line color represents evidence of the interaction between the proteins.
The Kaplan–Meier plotter
The Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test analyses revealed that the mRNA levels of the top five hub genes (COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, and COL12A1) were significantly associated with OS (P<0.05) (Figure 8).
Figure 8
The prognostic value of mRNA level of top five hub genes in bladder cancer patients (OS in Kaplan–Meier plotter)
Discussion
Bladder cancer, as a common malignant tumor, can be divided into MIBC and NMIBC depending on whether it invades the muscle layer or not. Treatment of most NMIBC patients can achieve a good therapeutic effect [10]. Once it progresses to the MIBC stage, the specific survival rate of the tumor is 65–78% [11]. Therefore, it is very important to explore the biological mechanism of occurrence and development of MIBC, especially with respect to the development of the disease from the gene level. It is possible that this development may provide us with new ideas and targets for the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC.Gene chip technology and high-throughput sequencing technology have been widely used in the research of various diseases. These technologies can let us directly describe the expression of thousands of genes. At present, many related articles and data have been published and uploaded to public databases for further research by other scientists.In the present paper, GSE31684 gene expression profile datasets of bladder cancer were available in the GEO database, and these datasets were analyzed using R software. A total of 389 DEGs were found, including 270 up-regulated and 119 down-regulated genes. After GO enrichment analysis of these genes, it was found that these DEGs were mainly enriched in ECM formation, collagen synthesis and metabolism, cell adhesion, and inflammatory response.The function of epithelial cells, including cell differentiation, migration and invasion, is regulated by interaction with ECM [12], meanwhile collagen is major structural component of the ECM, and tumor development of epithelial cells, including bladder tumors, is often accompanied by ECM changes and remodeling [13]. Recent reports demonstrated that alterations in the ECM microenvironment and collagen synthesis switch likely contributes to bladder cancer progression [14,15].KEGG signal pathway enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in protein digestion and absorption, ECM receiver interaction, phagosome, TLR signaling pathway, focal adhesion, NF-κB signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and other signaling pathways.The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is an important signaling pathway in the development of many tumors and in inflammation. It has been proved that the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway plays an important role in promoting the proliferation of tumor cells and can regulate cell metabolism, tumor development, migration, and cytoskeleton remodeling, leading to the occurrence, development, and metastasis of tumor cells [16,17]. The activation of PI3K/Akt pathway may also play an important role, including PTEN deficiency and PTEN negative regulation of PI3K level. Inactivation of PTEN associated with p53 has been shown to promote muscle-invasive phenotypes [18]The NF-κB signaling pathway plays an important role in promoting tumor cell proliferation, vascular production, invasion, and metastasis in the development of bladder cancer, especially bladder urothelial cancer [19-21]. TLRs and the TLR signaling pathway is an important part of the immune system. The TLR-related signaling pathway is involved in the process of epithelial cell proliferation and IgA production. TLRs play an important role in maintaining the tight connection of epithelial cells, recognizing other pathogenic molecular patterns, and inducing the expression of antimicrobial peptides. TLRs can promote inflammation, apoptosis, proliferation, and fibrosis through transduction, acting as tumor promoters [22,23]. The progress of bladder tumor is closely related to the realization of immune escape. The involvement and activation of TLRs and the TLR signaling pathway in bladder tumor can enhance the immune escape of bladder tumor to promote tumor invasion, resistance to apoptosis and resistance to chemotherapy, and finally lead to the progress of tumor [24]. In addition, the activation of TLRs and the TLR signaling pathway in tumor cells can also trigger the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, so as to play a role in promoting tumor progression [25].Next, we used DEGs to build the PPI network (Figure 7) and identify the top ten hub genes: COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, COL12A1, FBN1, COL5A2, COL6A3, COL6A2, and FN1. Through these results, we found that the top ten hub genes were all related to the ECM, and seven of them were related to collagen. Collagen is one of the main components of the ECM. At present, there are 19 known collagen subtypes. These proteins are composed of multiple protein chains, which provide tensile strength for tissues and play an important role in the tissue scaffold, cell adhesion, cell migration, cancer, angiogenesis, histo-morphogenesis, and tissue repair [26]. Collagen can promote the metastasis of tumor cells by increasing the effect of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [27], which is mainly because of the change in biological stress caused by ECM recombination, resulting in the morphological change of cancer cells, the decrease in adhesion, and the enhancement of metastatic ability [28].In addition, collagen can promote tumor progression through immune regulation; for example, signaling factors related to neutrophils are significantly increased in the high-density collagen-type breast cancer microenvironment [29]. COL1 can promote the transport of water and macromolecules in tumor cells, and the tumor microenvironment with high-density collagen can promote tumor proliferation by changing tumor metabolism [30,31].Collagen also has an important relationship with angiogenesis. The inhibition of collagen metabolism has an anti-angiogenic effect. Angiogenesis and survival are closely related to the appropriate collagen synthesized and deposition in the basement membrane [32], especially the structural integrity of COL4, which is the most important for tumor angiogenesis [33]. Periosteal protein (POSTN) is a multifunctional secretory protein, which can be synthesized by both tumor and stromal cells [34]. It plays an important role in the process of tumor EMT [35]. The expression of postn in tumor-related fiber cells or other stromal cells can promote the invasion of pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, esophageal adenocarcinomas, and other malignant tumors [36-38].
Conclusions
By analyzing the bladder cancer dataset GSE31684 in the GEO database using R software and other tools, a total of 389 DEGs were identified, including 270 up-regulated and 119 down-regulated genes. Through GO function enrichment analysis and KEGG pathway analysis, we found that these genes were enriched in ECM formation, collagen synthesis and metabolism, cell adhesion, inflammation, and other functions, as well as protein digestion and absorption, ECM receiver interaction, phagosome, TLR signaling pathway, focal adhesion, NF-κB signaling pathway, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. The PPI network of DEGs was constructed, and the most important ten genes were screened using cytoHubba. Survival analysis of the top five hub genes was carried out using TCGA database data. Our research found that the key genes, including COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, POSTN, and COL12A1, played an important role in the development of MIBC. These results may provide us with a further understanding of the occurrence and development of MIBC, as well as new targets for the diagnosis and treatment of MIBC in the future. However, there were some limitations in the present study that should be declared. The data from GSE31684 have a total of 15 NMIBC samples and 78 MIBC samples, the difference in sample size between the two groups may lead to statistical limitation. Besides, the hub genes on gene expression were only validated in TCGA database and these genes needs to be further validated with more experiment. Future studies will aim to use polymerase chain reaction or Western blotting to verify expression levels of the key genes in samples between MIBC and NMIBC.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Tjalling Bosse; Natalja T ter Haar; Laura M Seeber; Paul J v Diest; Frederik J Hes; Hans F A Vasen; Remi A Nout; Carien L Creutzberg; Hans Morreau; Vincent T H B M Smit Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Derya Tilki; Oliver Reich; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Giacomo Novara; Wassim Kassouf; Süleyman Ergün; Yves Fradet; Vincenzo Ficarra; Guru Sonpavde; Christian G Stief; Eila Skinner; Robert S Svatek; Yair Lotan; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Wenchao Zhou; Susan Q Ke; Zhi Huang; William Flavahan; Xiaoguang Fang; Jeremy Paul; Ling Wu; Andrew E Sloan; Roger E McLendon; Xiaoxia Li; Jeremy N Rich; Shideng Bao Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: María G García-Mendoza; David R Inman; Suzanne M Ponik; Justin J Jeffery; Dagna S Sheerar; Rachel R Van Doorn; Patricia J Keely Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Robert Petryszak; Tony Burdett; Benedetto Fiorelli; Nuno A Fonseca; Mar Gonzalez-Porta; Emma Hastings; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Jupp; Maria Keays; Nataliya Kryvych; Julie McMurry; John C Marioni; James Malone; Karine Megy; Gabriella Rustici; Amy Y Tang; Jan Taubert; Eleanor Williams; Oliver Mannion; Helen E Parkinson; Alvis Brazma Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Gina Reye; Xuan Huang; Larisa M Haupt; Ryan J Murphy; Jason J Northey; Erik W Thompson; Konstantin I Momot; Honor J Hugo Journal: J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 2.673