PURPOSE: We aimed to validate and improve prognostic signatures for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated microarray data from 93 patients with bladder cancer managed by radical cystectomy to determine gene expression patterns associated with clinical and prognostic variables. We compared our results with published bladder cancer microarray data sets comprising 578 additional patients and with 49 published gene signatures from multiple cancer types. Hierarchical clustering was utilized to identify subtypes associated with differences in survival. We then investigated whether the addition of survival-associated gene expression information to a validated postcystectomy nomogram utilizing clinical and pathologic variables improves prediction of recurrence. RESULTS: Multiple markers for muscle invasive disease with highly significant expression differences in multiple data sets were identified, such as fibronectin 1 (FN1), NNMT, POSTN, and SMAD6. We identified signatures associated with pathologic stage and the likelihood of developing metastasis and death from bladder cancer, as well as with two distinct clustering subtypes of bladder cancer. Our novel signature correlated with overall survival in multiple independent data sets, significantly improving the prediction concordance of standard staging in all data sets [mean ΔC-statistic: 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.27; P < 0.001]. Tested in our patient cohort, it significantly enhanced the performance of a postoperative survival nomogram (ΔC-statistic: 0.08, 95% CI, -0.04-0.20; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic information obtained from gene expression data can aid in posttreatment prediction of bladder cancer recurrence. Our findings require further validation in external cohorts and prospectively in a clinical trial setting.
PURPOSE: We aimed to validate and improve prognostic signatures for high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated microarray data from 93 patients with bladder cancer managed by radical cystectomy to determine gene expression patterns associated with clinical and prognostic variables. We compared our results with published bladder cancer microarray data sets comprising 578 additional patients and with 49 published gene signatures from multiple cancer types. Hierarchical clustering was utilized to identify subtypes associated with differences in survival. We then investigated whether the addition of survival-associated gene expression information to a validated postcystectomy nomogram utilizing clinical and pathologic variables improves prediction of recurrence. RESULTS: Multiple markers for muscle invasive disease with highly significant expression differences in multiple data sets were identified, such as fibronectin 1 (FN1), NNMT, POSTN, and SMAD6. We identified signatures associated with pathologic stage and the likelihood of developing metastasis and death from bladder cancer, as well as with two distinct clustering subtypes of bladder cancer. Our novel signature correlated with overall survival in multiple independent data sets, significantly improving the prediction concordance of standard staging in all data sets [mean ΔC-statistic: 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.27; P < 0.001]. Tested in our patient cohort, it significantly enhanced the performance of a postoperative survival nomogram (ΔC-statistic: 0.08, 95% CI, -0.04-0.20; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic information obtained from gene expression data can aid in posttreatment prediction of bladder cancer recurrence. Our findings require further validation in external cohorts and prospectively in a clinical trial setting.
Authors: Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend Journal: Nature Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: R Millikan; C Dinney; D Swanson; P Sweeney; J Y Ro; T L Smith; D Williams; C Logothetis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-10-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Anirban P Mitra; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Dongyun Yang; Frederic M Waldman; Ram H Datar; Donald G Skinner; Susan Groshen; Richard J Cote Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James W F Catto; Maysam F Abbod; Peter J Wild; Derek A Linkens; Christian Pilarsky; Ishtiaq Rehman; Derek J Rosario; Stefan Denzinger; Maximilian Burger; Robert Stoehr; Ruth Knuechel; Arndt Hartmann; Freddie C Hamdy Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jeffrey S Damrauer; Katherine A Hoadley; David D Chism; Cheng Fan; Christopher J Tiganelli; Sara E Wobker; Jen Jen Yeh; Matthew I Milowsky; Gopa Iyer; Joel S Parker; William Y Kim Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Feng Jin; Jose Thaiparambil; Sri Ramya Donepudi; Venkatrao Vantaku; Danthasinghe Waduge Badrajee Piyarathna; Suman Maity; Rashmi Krishnapuram; Vasanta Putluri; Franklin Gu; Preeti Purwaha; Salil Kumar Bhowmik; Chandrashekar R Ambati; Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt; Florian Roghmann; Sebastian Berg; Joachim Noldus; Kimal Rajapakshe; Daniel Gödde; Stephan Roth; Stephan Störkel; Stephan Degener; George Michailidis; Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Balasubramanyam Karanam; Martha K Terris; Shyam M Kavuri; Seth P Lerner; Farrah Kheradmand; Cristian Coarfa; Arun Sreekumar; Yair Lotan; Randa El-Zein; Nagireddy Putluri Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2017-08-29