Literature DB >> 32390720

Effects of an Impulse Frequency Dependent 10-Week Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training Program on Specific Sport Performance Parameters.

Joshua Berger1, Oliver Ludwig1, Stephan Becker1, Marco Backfisch1, Wolfgang Kemmler2, Michael Fröhlich1.   

Abstract

The difference in the efficacy of altered stimulation parameters in whole-body-electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training remains largely unexplored. However, higher impulse frequencies (>50 Hz) might be most adequate for strength gain. The aim of this study was to analyze potential differences in sports-related performance parameters after a 10-week WB-EMS training with different frequencies. A total of 51 untrained participants (24.9 ± 3.9 years, 174 ± 9 cm, 72.4 ± 16.4 kg, BMI 23.8 ± 4.1, body fat 24.7 ± 8.1 %) was randomly divided into three groups: one inactive control group (CON) and two training groups. They completed a 10-week WB-EMS program of 1.5 sessions/week, equal content but different stimulation frequencies (training with 20 Hz (T20) vs. training with 85 Hz (T85)). Before and after intervention, all participants completed jumping (Counter Movement Jump (CMJ), Squat Jump (SJ), Drop Jump (DJ)), sprinting (5m, 10m, 30m), and strength tests (isometric trunk flexion/extension). One-way ANOVA was applied to calculate parameter changes. Post-hoc least significant difference tests were performed to identify group differences. Significant differences were identified for CMJ (p = 0.007), SJ (p = 0.022), trunk flexion (p = 0.020) and extension (p=.013) with significant group differences between both training groups and CON (not between the two training groups T20 and T85). A 10-week WB-EMS training leads to significant improvements of jump and strength parameters in untrained participants. No differences could be detected between the frequencies. Therefore, both stimulation frequencies can be regarded as adequate for increasing specific sport performance parameters. Further aspects as regeneration or long term effects by the use of different frequencies still need to be clarified. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  WB-EMS; jumping; muscle fiber; performance diagnostics; sprinting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32390720      PMCID: PMC7196755     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  32 in total

1.  Effect of combined electrostimulation and plyometric training on vertical jump height.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Sergio Dugnani; Matteo Folz; Ermano Di Pierno; Franco Mauro
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Effect of whole-body electromyostimulation on energy expenditure during exercise.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Simon Von Stengel; Johannes Schwarz; Jerry L Mayhew
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes.

Authors:  Andre Filipovic; Heinz Kleinöder; Ulrike Dörmann; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Effects of a Whole-Body Electrostimulation Program on Strength, Sprinting, Jumping, and Kicking Capacity in Elite Soccer Players.

Authors:  Andre Filipovic; Marijke Grau; Heinz Kleinöder; Philipp Zimmer; Wildor Hollmann; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study.

Authors:  M A Johnson; J Polgar; D Weightman; D Appleton
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Changes in the recruitment threshold of motor units produced by cutaneous stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Garnett; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparison of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus Recognized Back-Strengthening Exercise Training on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Anja Weissenfels; Nicolas Wirtz; Ulrike Dörmann; Heinz Kleinöder; Lars Donath; Matthias Kohl; Michael Fröhlich; Simon von Stengel; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Improves Performance-Related Parameters in Runners.

Authors:  Francisco J Amaro-Gahete; Alejandro De-la-O; Guillermo Sanchez-Delgado; Lidia Robles-Gonzalez; Lucas Jurado-Fasoli; Jonatan R Ruiz; Angel Gutierrez
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on chronic nonspecific low back pain in adults: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Anja Weissenfels; Marc Teschler; Sebastian Willert; Michael Hettchen; Michael Fröhlich; Heinz Kleinöder; Matthias Kohl; Simon von Stengel; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.133

View more
  2 in total

1.  Can A Superimposed Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Intervention Enhance the Effects of a 10-Week Athletic Strength Training in Youth Elite Soccer Players?

Authors:  Oliver Ludwig; Joshua Berger; Torsten Schuh; Marco Backfisch; Stephan Becker; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Profile of Whole Body Electromyostimulation Training Users-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Luiz Rodrigues-Santana; Hugo Louro; Ángel Denche-Zamorano; Alejandro Vega-Muñoz; Nicolás Contreras-Barraza; Jose Carmelo Adsuar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.