Literature DB >> 22067247

Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes.

Andre Filipovic1, Heinz Kleinöder, Ulrike Dörmann, Joachim Mester.   

Abstract

This is the first part of 2 studies that systematically review the current state of research and structure the results of selected electromyostimulation (EMS) studies in a way that makes accurate comparisons possible. This part will focus on the effects of EMS on strength enhancement. On the basis of these results, part 2 will deal with the influence of the training regimen and stimulation parameters on EMS training effectiveness to make recommendations for training control. Out of about 200 studies, 89 trials were selected according to predefined criteria: subject age (<35 years), subject health (unimpaired), EMS type (percutaneous stimulation), and study duration (>7 days). To evaluate these trials, we first defined appropriate categories according to the type of EMS (local or whole body) and type of muscle contraction (isometric, dynamic, isokinetic). Then, we established the most relevant strength parameters for high-performance sports: maximal strength, speed strength, power, jumping and sprinting ability. Unlike former reviews, this study differentiates between 3 categories of subjects based on their level of fitness (untrained subjects, trained subjects, and elite athletes) and on the types of EMS methods used (local, whole-body, combination). Special focus was on trained and elite athletes. Untrained athletes were investigated for comparison purposes. This scientific analysis revealed that EMS is effective for developing physical performance. After a stimulation period of 3-6 weeks, significant gains (p < 0.05) were shown in maximal strength (isometric Fmax +58.8%; dynamic Fmax +79.5%), speed strength (eccentric isokinetic Mmax +37.1%; concentric isokinetic Mmax + 41.3%; rate of force development + 74%; force impulse + 29%; vmax + 19%), and power (+67%). Developing these parameters increases vertical jump height by up to +25% (squat jump +21.4%, countermovement jump +19.2%, drop jump +12%) and improves sprint times by as much as -4.8% in trained and elite athletes. With regard to the level of fitness, the analysis shows that trained and elite athletes, despite their already high level of fitness, are able to significantly enhance their level of strength to same extent as is possible with untrained subjects. The EMS offers a promising alternative to traditional strength training for enhancing the strength parameters and motor abilities described above. Because of the clear-cut advantages in time management, especially when whole-body EMS is used, we can expect this method to see the increasing use in high-performance sports.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22067247     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  33 in total

1.  Chronic effects of superimposed electromyostimulation during cycling on aerobic and anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  Sebastian Mathes; Niklas Lehnen; Tobias Link; Wilhelm Bloch; Joachim Mester; Patrick Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of a Whole-Body Electrostimulation Program on Strength, Sprinting, Jumping, and Kicking Capacity in Elite Soccer Players.

Authors:  Andre Filipovic; Marijke Grau; Heinz Kleinöder; Philipp Zimmer; Wildor Hollmann; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Motor point map of upper body muscles.

Authors:  M Behringer; A Franz; M McCourt; J Mester
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of Loaded Squat Exercise with and without Application of Superimposed EMS on Physical Performance.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirtz; Christoph Zinner; Ulrike Doermann; Heinz Kleinoeder; Joachim Mester
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Can A Superimposed Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Intervention Enhance the Effects of a 10-Week Athletic Strength Training in Youth Elite Soccer Players?

Authors:  Oliver Ludwig; Joshua Berger; Torsten Schuh; Marco Backfisch; Stephan Becker; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Effects of an Impulse Frequency Dependent 10-Week Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training Program on Specific Sport Performance Parameters.

Authors:  Joshua Berger; Oliver Ludwig; Stephan Becker; Marco Backfisch; Wolfgang Kemmler; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Iron Beats Electricity: Resistance Training but Not Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Improves Cardiometabolic Health in Obese Metabolic Syndrome Patients during Caloric Restriction-A Randomized-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Dejan Reljic; Hans J Herrmann; Markus F Neurath; Yurdagül Zopf
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Maximal muscular power: lessons from sprint cycling.

Authors:  Jamie Douglas; Angus Ross; James C Martin
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus High-Intensity Resistance Exercise on Body Composition and Strength: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Marc Teschler; Anja Weißenfels; Michael Bebenek; Michael Fröhlich; Matthias Kohl; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.