R Forleo1, N Fralassi1, F Maino1, M Capezzone1, L Brilli1, T Pilli1, S Cantara1, M G Castagna2. 1. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 16, 53100, Siena, Italy. 2. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 16, 53100, Siena, Italy. mariagrazia.castagna@unisi.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We speculated that radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) could be performed less frequently in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, if the recommendations of the 2018 Italian Consensus (ITA) were applied in clinical practice. Therefore, we compared the ITA indications for RRA with the recommendations by the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines (ATA). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 380 consecutive DTC patients treated with surgery and RRA, followed at the Section of Endocrinology, University of Siena, Italy from January 2006 to December 2019. RESULTS: Using ITA a significant increase of DTC patients classified as low or high risk and a significant decrease of patients defined at intermediate risk were observed (p < 0.0001). Consequently, the percentage of patients without routinary indication for RRA (47.4%, versus 38.2%, p < 0.0001) and those with a definite indication for RRA (8.2 versus 1.8%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher compared to ATA. Moreover, using ITA the percentage of patients with a selective use of RRA was lower in comparison to ATA (44.7% versus 60%, p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, the prevalence of distant metastases, at post-ablative whole body scan, in patients without indication for RRA, was not different using either ATA or ITA (2.1% and 1.1% respectively, p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The use of ITA Consensus, in clinical practice, increases significantly the number of patients for whom RRA is not routinely indicated in comparison to ATA guidelines but without differences in delaying the diagnosis of distant metastatic disease.
PURPOSE: We speculated that radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) could be performed less frequently in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, if the recommendations of the 2018 Italian Consensus (ITA) were applied in clinical practice. Therefore, we compared the ITA indications for RRA with the recommendations by the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines (ATA). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 380 consecutive DTC patients treated with surgery and RRA, followed at the Section of Endocrinology, University of Siena, Italy from January 2006 to December 2019. RESULTS: Using ITA a significant increase of DTC patients classified as low or high risk and a significant decrease of patients defined at intermediate risk were observed (p < 0.0001). Consequently, the percentage of patients without routinary indication for RRA (47.4%, versus 38.2%, p < 0.0001) and those with a definite indication for RRA (8.2 versus 1.8%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher compared to ATA. Moreover, using ITA the percentage of patients with a selective use of RRA was lower in comparison to ATA (44.7% versus 60%, p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, the prevalence of distant metastases, at post-ablative whole body scan, in patients without indication for RRA, was not different using either ATA or ITA (2.1% and 1.1% respectively, p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The use of ITA Consensus, in clinical practice, increases significantly the number of patients for whom RRA is not routinely indicated in comparison to ATA guidelines but without differences in delaying the diagnosis of distant metastatic disease.
Authors: Jacqueline Jonklaas; David S Cooper; Kenneth B Ain; Thomas Bigos; James D Brierley; Bryan R Haugen; Paul W Ladenson; James Magner; Douglas S Ross; Monica C Skarulis; David L Steward; Harry R Maxon; Steven I Sherman Journal: Thyroid Date: 2010-11-07 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Laura Fugazzola; Rossella Elisei; Dagmar Fuhrer; Barbara Jarzab; Sophie Leboulleux; Kate Newbold; Jan Smit Journal: Eur Thyroid J Date: 2019-08-28
Authors: Jacqueline Jonklaas; Nicholas J Sarlis; Danielle Litofsky; Kenneth B Ain; S Thomas Bigos; James D Brierley; David S Cooper; Bryan R Haugen; Paul W Ladenson; James Magner; Jacob Robbins; Douglas S Ross; Monica Skarulis; Harry R Maxon; Steven I Sherman Journal: Thyroid Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: F Pacini; F Basolo; R Bellantone; G Boni; M A Cannizzaro; M De Palma; C Durante; R Elisei; G Fadda; A Frasoldati; L Fugazzola; R Guglielmi; C P Lombardi; P Miccoli; E Papini; G Pellegriti; L Pezzullo; A Pontecorvi; M Salvatori; E Seregni; P Vitti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: L Leenhardt; M O Bernier; M H Boin-Pineau; B Conte Devolx; R Maréchaud; P Niccoli-Sire; M Nocaudie; J Orgiazzi; M Schlumberger; J L Wémeau; L Chérie-Challine; F De Vathaire Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 6.664