Literature DB >> 33876255

Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects of residual varus/valgus malunion after femoral fracture on knee joint.

Kai Ding1,2, Weijie Yang1,2, Haicheng Wang1,2, Shi Zhan3, Pan Hu1,2, Junsheng Bai1,2, Chuan Ren1,2, Qi Zhang1,2, Yanbin Zhu4,5, Wei Chen6,7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Post-operative femoral shaft fractures are often accompanied by a residual varus/valgus deformity, which can result in osteoarthritis in severe cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of residual varus/valgus deformities after middle and lower femoral fracture on the stress distribution and contact area of knee joint.
METHODS: Thin-slice CT scanning of lower extremities and MRI imaging of knee joints were obtained from a healthy adult male to establish normal lower limb model (neutral position). Then, the models of 3°, 5°, and 10° of varus/valgus were established respectively by modifying middle and lower femur of normal model. To validate the modifying, a patient-specific model, whose BMI was same to former and had 10° of varus deformity of tibia, was built and simulated under the same boundary conditions. RESULT: The contact area and maximum stress of modified models were similar to those of patient-specific model. The contact area and maximum stress of medial tibial cartilage in normal neutral position were 244.36 mm2 and 0.64 MPa, while those of lateral were 196.25 mm2 and 0.76 MPa. From 10° of valgus neutral position to 10° of varus, the contact area and maximum stress of medial tibial cartilage increased, and the lateral gradually decreased. The contact area and maximum stress of medial meniscus in normal neutral position were 110.91 mm2 and 3.24 MPa, while those of lateral were 135.83 mm2 and 3.45 MPa. The maximum stress of medial tibia subchondral bone in normal neutral position was 1.47 MPa, while that of lateral was 0.65 MPa. The variation trend of medial/lateral meniscus and subchondral bone was consistent with that of tibial plateau cartilage in the contact area and maximum stress.
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that varus/valgus deformity of femur had an obvious effect on the contact area and stress distribution of knee joint, providing biomechanical evidence and deepening understanding when performing orthopedic trauma surgery or surgical correction of the already existing varus/valgus deformity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical effect; Femur fractures; Finite element analysis; Knee arthritis; Varus/valgus deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33876255     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05039-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  34 in total

Review 1.  Management of traumatic femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  David V Cary
Journal:  JAAPA       Date:  2005-02

Review 2.  History of external fixation for treatment of fractures.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  National incidence of traumatic fractures in China: a retrospective survey of 512 187 individuals.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Hongzhi Lv; Song Liu; Bo Liu; Yanbin Zhu; Xiao Chen; Guang Yang; Lei Liu; Tao Zhang; Haili Wang; Bing Yin; Jialiang Guo; Xiaolin Zhang; Yichong Li; Derek Smith; Pan Hu; Jiayuan Sun; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 26.763

4.  Functional outcome of open distal femoral fractures managed with lateral locking plates.

Authors:  Deepak Jain; Raghav Arora; Rajnish Garg; Pankaj Mahindra; Harpal S Selhi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimally invasive treatment of displaced femoral shaft fractures with a rapid reductor and intramedullary nail fixation.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Tao Zhang; Juan Wang; Bo Liu; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Femoral shaft fractures].

Authors:  T Gösling; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  High mortality following distal femur fractures: a cohort study including three hundred and two distal femur fractures.

Authors:  Peter Larsen; Adriano Axel Ceccotti; Rasmus Elsoe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  R F Ostrum; J DiCicco; R Lakatos; A Poka
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  High-energy femur fractures increase morbidity but not mortality in elderly patients.

Authors:  Kushal V Patel; Kindyle L Brennan; Matthew L Davis; Daniel C Jupiter; Michael L Brennan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  William M Ricci; Bethany Gallagher; George J Haidukewych
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  3 in total

1.  Should cannulated screws be removed after a femoral neck fracture has healed, and how? A finite element analysis of the femur before and after cannulated screw removal.

Authors:  Le Wu; Jun Sun; Nan Fang; Qing Peng; Shuo Gao; Lifeng Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 2.  Future Directions in Patellofemoral Imaging and 3D Modeling.

Authors:  Navya Dandu; Derrick M Knapik; Nicholas A Trasolini; Athan G Zavras; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  A comparative Study of Novel Extramedullary Fixation and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Finite-Element Analysis.

Authors:  Kai Ding; Yanbin Zhu; Haicheng Wang; Yonglong Li; Weijie Yang; Xiaodong Cheng; Yingze Zhang; Wei Chen; Qi Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.