Literature DB >> 32222186

Offline: COVID-19 and the NHS-"a national scandal".

Richard Horton.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32222186      PMCID: PMC7194929          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30727-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
“When this is all over, the NHS England board should resign in their entirety.” So wrote one National Health Service (NHS) health worker last weekend. The scale of anger and frustration is unprecedented, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the cause. The UK Government's Contain–Delay–Mitigate–Research strategy failed. It failed, in part, because ministers didn't follow WHO's advice to “test, test, test” every suspected case. They didn't isolate and quarantine. They didn't contact trace. These basic principles of public health and infectious disease control were ignored, for reasons that remain opaque. The UK now has a new plan—Suppress–Shield–Treat–Palliate. But this plan, agreed far too late in the course of the outbreak, has left the NHS wholly unprepared for the surge of severely and critically ill patients that will soon come. I asked NHS workers to contact me with their experiences. Their messages have been as distressing as they have been horrifying. “It's terrifying for staff at the moment. Still no access to personal protective equipment [PPE] or testing.” “Rigid command structures make decision making impossible.” “There's been no guidelines, it's chaos.” “I don't feel safe. I don't feel protected.” “We are literally making it up as we go along.” “It feels as if we are actively harming patients.” “We need protection and prevention.” “Total carnage.” “NHS Trusts continue to fail miserably.” “Humanitarian crisis.” “Forget lockdown—we are going into meltdown.” “When I was country director in many conflict zones, we had better preparedness.” “The hospitals in London are overwhelmed.” “The public and media are not aware that today we no longer live in a city with a properly functioning western health-care system.” “How will we protect our patients and staff…I am speechless. It is utterly unconscionable. How can we do this? It is criminal…NHS England was not prepared…We feel completely helpless.” England's Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Jenny Harries, said on March 20, 2020: “The country has a perfectly adequate supply of PPE.” She claimed that supply pressures had now been “completely resolved”. I am sure Dr Harries believed what she said. But she was wrong and she should apologise to the thousands of health workers who still have no access to WHO-standard PPE. I receive examples daily of doctors having to assess patients with respiratory symptoms but who do so without the necessary PPE to complete their jobs safely. Health workers are challenged if they ask for face masks. Even where there is PPE, there may be no training. WHO standards are not being met. Proper testing of masks is being omitted. Stickers with new expiry dates are being put on PPE that expired in 2016. Doctors have been forced to go to hardware stores to buy their own face masks. Patients with suspected COVID-19 are mixing with non-COVID-19 patients. The situation is so dire that staff are frequently breaking down in tears. As one physician wrote, “The utter failure of sound clinical leadership will lead to an absolute explosion of nosocomial COVID-19 infection.” Front-line staff are already contracting and dying from the disease. The NHS has been wholly unprepared for this pandemic. It's impossible to understand why. Based on their modelling of the Wuhan outbreak of COVID-19, Joseph Wu and his colleagues wrote in The Lancet on Jan 31, 2020: “On the present trajectory, 2019-nCoV could be about to become a global epidemic…for health protection within China and internationally…preparedness plans should be readied for deployment at short notice, including securing supply chains of pharmaceuticals, personal protective equipment, hospital supplies, and the necessary human resources to deal with the consequences of a global outbreak of this magnitude.” This warning wasn't made lightly. It should have been read by the Chief Medical Officer, the Chief Executive Officer of the NHS in England, and the Chief Scientific Adviser. They had a duty to immediately put the NHS and British public on high alert. February should have been used to expand coronavirus testing capacity, ensure the distribution of WHO-approved PPE, and establish training programmes and guidelines to protect NHS staff. They didn't take any of those actions. The result has been chaos and panic across the NHS. Patients will die unnecessarily. NHS staff will die unnecessarily. It is, indeed, as one health worker wrote last week, “a national scandal”. The gravity of that scandal has yet to be understood.
  45 in total

Review 1.  An exploration of the political, social, economic and cultural factors affecting how different global regions initially reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Julian W Tang; Miguela A Caniza; Mike Dinn; Dominic E Dwyer; Jean-Michel Heraud; Lance C Jennings; Jen Kok; Kin On Kwok; Yuguo Li; Tze Ping Loh; Linsey C Marr; Eva Megumi Nara; Nelun Perera; Reiko Saito; Carlos Santillan-Salas; Sheena Sullivan; Matt Warner; Aripuanã Watanabe; Sabeen Khurshid Zaidi
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Seeing Covid-19 Through a Subprime Crisis lens: How Structural and Institutional Racism Have Shaped 21st-Century Crises in the U.K. and the U.S.

Authors:  Frank Curry; Gary Dymski; Tanita J Lewis; Hanna K Szymborska
Journal:  Rev Black Polit Econ       Date:  2022-03

3.  How COVID-19 Has Globalized: Unknown Origin, Rapid Transmission, and the Immune System Nourishment.

Authors:  Amene Saghazadeh; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child health services in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Anil K Singh; Pankaj K Jain; Naresh P Singh; Sandip Kumar; Prashant K Bajpai; Soni Singh; Mohan Jha
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-10-30

5.  Embracing virtual outpatient clinics in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  George Lee; Oliver T Clough; Edward Hayter; James Morris; Thomas Ashdown; John Hardman; Raymond Anakwe
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-05

6.  Age-sex population adjusted analysis of disease severity in epidemics as a tool to devise public health policies for COVID-19.

Authors:  Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Ilaria Capua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Anaesthesia and intensive care medicine in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jolin Wong; Shin Yi Ng; Meng Huat Goh; Kian Hian Tan; Hui Zhong Chai; Ken Junyang Goh; Chai Rick Soh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.331

8.  Public health, health systems and palliation planning for COVID-19 on an exponential timeline.

Authors:  C Raina MacIntyre; David J Heslop
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Paramedic experiences of providing care in wales (UK) during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic (PECC-19): a qualitative study using evolved grounded theory.

Authors:  Nigel Rees; Lauren Smythe; Chloe Hogan; Julia Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Challenge of treating skeletal muscle metastasis during the COVID-19 pandemic in a low-resource setting.

Authors:  Maria Gloria Elisha Casas; Mamer Rosario; Geoffrey Battad; Adrienne Camille Mercado; Trisha Ann Hermogenes; Alvin Hernandez; Janelyn Dy-Ledesma; Avelino Alomesen; Juancho Lorenzo Valera; Arnel Christian Dy
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.