Literature DB >> 32387072

COVID-19 and rhinology, from the consultation room to the operating theatre.

T Radulesco1, B Verillaud2, E Béquignon3, J-F Papon4, R Jankowski5, L Le Taillandier De Gabory6, P Dessi1, A Coste3, E Serrano7, S Vergez8, F Simon9, V Couloigner9, C Rumeau5, J Michel10.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to give rhinologists advice on how to adapt their standard practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main goal of these recommendations is to protect healthcare workers against COVID-19 while continuing to provide emergency care so as to prevent loss of chance for patients. We reviewed our recommendations concerning consultations, medical prescriptions and surgical activity in rhinology.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergic rhinitis; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Corticosteroids; Endonasal treatment; Endoscopy; Nasal cavity; Nasal lavages; Nasal spray; Nasopharynx; Otorhinolaryngology; Rhinology; SARS-CoV-2; Sinonasal polyposis; Sinus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32387072      PMCID: PMC7190480          DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis        ISSN: 1879-7296            Impact factor:   2.080


Introduction

The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on the treatment of patients in all medical and surgical specialties [1]. Clinical practice should be adapted to protect both patients and healthcare workers. In the face of this unprecedented situation, scientific societies are required to publish recommendations without delay to aid practitioners in their decision-making [2]. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is mostly found in the upper airways, with high viral loads in the nasal cavities and the oral cavity [3]. Any ENT diagnostic or therapeutic procedure therefore carries a risk of spreading the virus and contaminating the healthcare team. This risk seems to be particularly high in the field of rhinology and endoscopic endonasal surgery [4], [5]. Clinical examination and invasive procedures on the nasal cavities and connected cavities (sinus, nasopharynx, skull base) expose people to direct transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of contaminated droplets or projections to the eyes, or by indirect transmission when touching contaminated hands, surfaces or objects [6]. This article has been written by a college of specialist rhinologists under the aegis of the following French scientific societies: the French ENT Society (SFORL), French Rhinology Association (AFR), French ENT College, French ENT National Union (SNORL), and French National Professional ENT Council (CNPORL). Its aim is to help rhinologists adapt their clinical practice. This advice may need to change according to the health situation.

Rhinologist consultations during an epidemic

General information

In rhinology, but also in other ENT sub-specialties, the medical and paramedical staffs are particularly exposed to contamination. Contamination risk is increased during transport for medical reasons therefore we advise that only patients whose treatment cannot be delayed attend for rhinology consultations. Before confirming the patient's appointment, we recommend that they be contacted by telephone to check that: consultation for an urgent physical examination is justified; the patient does not have any suspicious signs of COVID-19. The clinical signs of COVID-19 to look out for are: fever (T° > 38 °C) or feverishness; cough; chest pain caused by coughing; shortness of breath; abdominal symptoms; headaches; anosmia ± ageusia (loss of taste and/or smell) for less than a month; high risk of contamination, defined as having been less than a meter away from a COVID-19 positive patient for at least 15 min. Patients presenting with any of these symptoms should be directed to an emergency department or a specialized centre. The expanded use of teleconsultation or telephone follow-up of patients, especially those for whom a surgical procedure has been postponed or patients with chronic illnesses, should be prioritized during the pandemic. It is also recommended that appointments have a greater interval between two patients, and that the waiting room should be organized to comply with social distancing measures. Also, any newspapers and magazines that could cause contamination via people's hands should be removed.

Who to see for a consultation?

According to current recommendations concerning telephone calls or teleconsultations, the following conditions apply and only urgent consultations should be seen face to face. The indications for rhinology consultations have been listed in agreement with the French National Professional ENT Council (CNPORL). They involve any symptoms indicative of life-threatening or functional pathologies for the patient in the near future: adult epistaxis (high blood pressure, anticoagulants); persistent unilateral nasal obstruction and any suspicion of sinonasal tumour syndrome (after CT-scan or MRI imaging); foul-smelling nasal discharge or sinusitis with high risk of serious complications (after CT-scans); neuromeningeal or ophthalmological involvement; foreign body; facial trauma.

Physical examination

Even asymptomatic patients should be considered as COVID positive. The endonasal physical examination is a high-risk procedure. Nasal endoscopies should therefore only be performed when mandatory because of the potential contamination risk. Regarding protection of healthcare workers, all barrier methods must be implemented. In cases of flexible or rigid nasal endoscopy, we recommend wearing a fluid-resistant surgical mask (FFP2/N95), a single-use disposable fluid-repellent gown, an apron, gloves, headwear and eye protection [7], [8]. FFP2 masks have a particle penetration rate of only 6%, and the maximum leakage rate around the face and nose is 8% [9]. In the United Kingdom, some authors even recommend use of an FFP3 mask [10]. FFP3 have a particle penetration rate of only 1%, and the maximum leakage rate around the face and nose is 2%. After use, the flexible or rigid endoscope must be decontaminated immediately in accordance with the protocol currently used in the institution. The air in the consulting room must routinely be replaced and the room must be thoroughly cleaned after each patient. Specific advice approved by the SFORL has been published for private practices (distancing, hand hygiene, waste management and cleaning, maintenance of premises and equipment) [11]. The physical examination can also be performed in a dedicated consulting room, not the same one as where the patient interview takes place, to avoid contaminating the furniture.

Medical prescriptions

The main therapeutic issues in rhinology concern the prescription of corticosteroid therapy (intranasal or systemic) and the use of nasal saline washes.

Concerning corticosteroid therapy

Systemic: to date, in agreement with WHO recommendations, systemic corticosteroid therapy is not recommended in COVID-19 patients as it may aggravate ARDS. Newly prescribed rhinology treatments during the pandemic should take into account the specific risks associated with potential presence of coronavirus in the upper airways. Given that the impact of systemic corticosteroids is still uncertain, we advise against this type of treatment, for example in cases of chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps or acute or very painful sinusitis. Conversely, systemic use of antibiotics is still possible, in accordance with the usual recommendations. Intranasal: no data indicates that the use of local corticosteroids may increase sensitivity to coronavirus. It may even be feared that stopping intranasal corticosteroid therapy in patients would increase their rhinitis symptoms, making it harder to recognize the symptoms of COVID-19, and facilitate the spread of the virus when they sneeze and blow their nose. It is recommended that patients continue to use their regular medication, especially corticosteroids used as a nasal spray or personal inhalers. Intranasal corticosteroids may be newly prescribed if there is no alternative. However, the use of antihistamine sprays and anticholinergic sprays should be preferred whenever possible, as well as oral antihistamines. One exception should be noted: aerosol therapy should be stopped due to the risk of spreading the virus to people in the same room as the patient.

Concerning nasal saline washes

Treatment involving nasal saline wash is a matter of debate, as there could in theory be a risk of spreading the virus to the lungs and upper airways. In the absence of published data on the subject, and taking our cue from similar viral infectious diseases (bronchiolitis, flu), it may be concluded that nasal saline wash is still possible if deemed essential, for example after a surgical procedure. Precautions are still justified to prevent people around the patient being contaminated. In patients infected by COVID-19, the nasal cavities constitute a “reservoir” with a high concentration of the virus. Treatments using sprays and nasal washes therefore carry a theoretical risk of contaminating other people. Strict hygiene measures should ideally be taken during treatment: washing hands before and after treatment, washing equipment (syringes or devices used for sprays and/or washes) with soap and water and disinfecting it weekly, draining out all the liquid after the nasal wash, and disinfecting soiled surfaces. Treatment should take place when the patient is alone in a room. After completion of the wash and maintenance activities, the room should be left empty for 10 minutes, ventilated as well as possible, without letting anybody in. Ideally, treatment should take place in a room that is only used by the patient, to prevent contamination via surfaces that have not been fully disinfected.

Specific recommendations

Two pathologies have been the subject to specific recommendations in relation to COVID-19: acute anosmia and epistaxis.

Acute anosmia

A significant proportion of COVID-19 patients (up to 85%) present with anosmia [12]. Anosmia can be the first symptom and can appear before other symptoms such as a cough or fever [13]. Patients presenting with sudden-onset anosmia should be considered highly suspicious of COVID-19. The SFORL issued a recommendation on how to treat anosmia on 20 March 2020 [14]. Anyone presenting with such a symptom is advised to stay at home and monitor the appearance of any further symptom indicative of COVID-19. In this context, anosmia is only slightly accompanied by a runny nose or blocked nose, or not at all. We do not therefore recommend prescribing nasal saline irrigations in this situation, as it is not indicated and is not recommended to treat anosmia. In the absence of proof of efficacy, we do not recommend prescribing treatment, especially not systemic or intranasal corticosteroids for any presentation involving acute anosmia (loss of smell) or dysgeusia (altered taste) [15]. Acute anosmia's evolution when linked to COVID-19 is often spontaneously favourable. When anosmia persists, we recommend giving the patient a list of olfactory stimulation exercises to be performed daily (Table 1 ) and directing them to an ENT rhinology department specializing in treatment of olfactory disorders [16].
Table 1

Example of olfactory stimulation exercises to be performed daily in cases of persistent anosmia.

Aroma
Vanilla
Coffee
Dill
Thyme
Cinnamon
Clove
Lavender
Coriander
Light vinegar
Mint
Cumin

Instructions: read the name of the product before smelling it to give the sensory system time to link the two pieces of information. Exercise to be performed daily using labelled jars. Can be purchased from the spice shelf in supermarkets. Other protocols are available.

Example of olfactory stimulation exercises to be performed daily in cases of persistent anosmia. Instructions: read the name of the product before smelling it to give the sensory system time to link the two pieces of information. Exercise to be performed daily using labelled jars. Can be purchased from the spice shelf in supermarkets. Other protocols are available.

Epistaxis

There is no published data yet on specific treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak. However, based on proposals from ENT UK [17], a decision-tree has been approved by the SFORL and AFR (Fig. 1 ). The aim is to reduce the number of hospital admissions for nosebleeds and ensure the safety of healthcare staff and patients.
Fig. 1

Epistaxis management decision-tree proposed by ENTUK (https://www.entuk.org/sites/default/files/COVID%2019%20Epistaxis%20Management.pdf) and approved by the French Rhinology Association (AFR).

Epistaxis management decision-tree proposed by ENTUK (https://www.entuk.org/sites/default/files/COVID%2019%20Epistaxis%20Management.pdf) and approved by the French Rhinology Association (AFR). Note that epistaxis is not a symptom that should lead healthcare professionals to suspect COVID-19. Nonetheless, nosebleeds may occur more frequently in COVID-19+ patients due to their being put on preventive anticoagulation, because of the increased risk of thrombosis in these patients. It is recommended that the patient blow his/her nose and saline irrigations to clear out any clots should be done by the patient if possible, without any staff around to avoid the risk of airborne contamination. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with effective anticoagulation can cause nosebleeds. If nasal packing is required, the same level of protection should be used as when performing an endoscopy and absorbable material should be used when possible. Nasal endoscopy is only useful for nosebleeds if a haemorrhagic tumour is suspected. This does not apply to COVID-19+ patients and it induces a very high risk of airborne contamination for the operator. Anticoagulated patients should have a contrast-CT straight away (if the nosebleed persists despite the use of a balloon catheter) with radioembolization as a priority, because endonasal surgery carries a very high risk of contaminating the operating staff: it is not therefore recommended in this situation.

The rhinologist in the operative room

Endonasal surgical procedures are included in the procedures at risk of contaminating surgeons and surrounding staff due to the high viral loads in nasal cavities [3], [6]. This risk is aggravated by the use of motor devices such as high speed drills and, possibly, microdebriders [5]. The surgical indications should therefore be limited to the urgent procedures listed in the paragraph below.

Surgical indications

Endonasal surgical procedures can be categorized into 3 groups relating to the degree of urgency and are listed in Table 2 . This table illustrates the pathologies to be graded according to their severity, but is not exhaustive:
Table 2

Classification of endonasal surgery indications: best practice advice in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Endonasal surgery
GroupPathology or type of procedureRecommended approach
GroupA
 Surgery that cannot be postponedSinusitis with complications (cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis, neuromeningeal damage) or on fragile terrainEmergency treatment
Invasive fungal sinusitis
Complicated mucocele (neurological or ophthalmic signs)
Very displaced nasal fracture, foreign body in the nasal cavity
Nosebleed not controlled by a balloon catheter when radioembolization is not possible
Sinus and nasal cavity cancers
Osteo-meningeal defectsa
GroupB
 Risk of prognostic impact if treatment delayed for more than a monthInverted papillomasPostpone surgery
Fungal sinusitis in immunodeficient patientsReassess the patient after 1 month and adapt the treatment programme according to the course of the disease and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic
Mucocele without compression
Osteo-meningeal defectsa
GroupC
 Surgery which can be postponed for a minimum of 6 to 8 weeks without significant prognostic impactCRSwNPPostpone surgery
Sinus aspergilloma, oro-antral fistulaReassess the patient after 6 to 8 weeks and adapt the treatment programme according to the course of the disease and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic
Benign lesion to be removed via endonasal approach
Rhinoseptoplasty
Dacryocystorhinostomy via endonasal approach

CRSwNP: chronic nasal sinusitis with nasal polyps. Non-exhaustive list.

Degree of urgency to be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

surgery not to be postponed; surgical to be postponed for up to four week without any significant impact on prognosis; surgery which can be postponed for a minimum of 6 to 8 weeks without significant prognostic impact. Classification of endonasal surgery indications: best practice advice in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. CRSwNP: chronic nasal sinusitis with nasal polyps. Non-exhaustive list. Degree of urgency to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. All surgeries in groups B and C must therefore be postponed during the phase where the pandemic is spreading. Postponing treatment of a COVID-19+ patient in groups B or C will first and foremost allow patients to heal and their COVID-19 status to become negative again.

COVID-19 protocol

Some teams use a “COVID-19 protocol” approved by the French Infection Control Committee:

Prior to hospitalization

The patient is contacted by telephone 48 h before admission to the hospital, to conduct the COVID-19 interview (recorded in the patient's medical file) and ensure there are no suspicious symptoms.

During hospitalization

Patient admission 24 to 48 h before the date of the surgery. On their arrival, a member of the medical or paramedical staff conducts the COVID-19 interview. A nasal swab for COVID-19 RT-PCR and a low-dose chest CT-scan should ideally be performed so that the patient's COVID-19 status may be determined (except in cases of extreme emergency). PCR tests have a non-negligible false negative rate and are not sufficient, on their own, to define the patient's COVID-19 status [18]. If the patients present with suspicious symptoms, even in cases of negative PCR, surgery should be postponed for 15 days or longer if possible. The patient must then be tested again before rescheduling.

In the operating theatre

Dedicated COVID-19 operating theatres should be identified [19]. The operating room should, at least, have negative pressure airflow in order to reduce the risk of spreading the virus [20]. Adapted anaesthesia protocols (closed-circuit ventilation) may be proposed to reduce the risk of contaminating the medical and paramedical staff [8]. During procedures on a patient with COVID-19+ status or unknown COVID-19 status, the number of healthcare workers in the room should be reduced to the strict minimum. These healthcare workers must routinely protect themselves by wearing a surgical gown or coveralls, a FFP2 mask, protective goggles, gloves and two caps. The gown or coveralls, gloves, FFP2 mask and outer cap should be removed in the room where the procedure or treatment has taken place and should be disposed of in line with procedures for handling Infectious Medical Waste (IMW). It is also possible use a transparent cover over the patient, to minimize the spread of the virus due to leakage from the endotracheal tube. In cases of endonasal surgery that cannot be postponed on a COVID-19+ patient, it is recommended that, if possible, surgeons should use special powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) protective equipment [21]. Concerning surgical techniques, it is recommended that alternatives to the endonasal approach be prioritized if the use of motorized equipment can thus be avoided (external paracanthal, paralateronasal, sublabial approach). High speed drills are especially known to increase the risk of aerosolization or spray from tissue micro-fragments contaminated by the virus [5]. In cases of nasosinusal cancer surgery where drilling is necessary (opening of the anterior skull base for example), the endonasal approach should still be preferred.

Decision-tree

Different situations can therefore be identified according to the risk and to the patient's COVID-19 status: group A and COVID-19 positive patient: COVID-19 protocol; group A and COVID-19 status unknown: COVID-19 protocol; group A and COVID-19 negative patient (interview, PCR and negative scan): patient operated on in a conventional sector; group B or C, irrespective of COVID-19 status: surgery postponed. Group B should be prioritized over group C once rescheduling is possible, after all patients in group A have been treated.

Conclusion

These precautions and recommendations during this particular period of the pandemic should be adapted in the future to any new scientific data and to the national and international situation.

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
  15 in total

1.  COVID-19: Protecting our ENT Workforce.

Authors:  James R Tysome; Mahmood F Bhutta
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; Govind Persad; Ross Upshur; Beatriz Thome; Michael Parker; Aaron Glickman; Cathy Zhang; Connor Boyle; Maxwell Smith; James P Phillips
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Presentation of new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  C Hopkins; P Surda; N Kumar
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Examination of olfactory training effectiveness in relation to its complexity and the cause of olfactory loss.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Sandra Hanf; Katie L Whitcroft; Antje Haehner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Alan D Workman; D Bradley Welling; Bob S Carter; William T Curry; Eric H Holbrook; Stacey T Gray; George A Scangas; Benjamin S Bleier
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Inpatient and outpatient case prioritization for patients with neuro-oncologic disease amid the COVID-19 pandemic: general guidance for neuro-oncology practitioners from the AANS/CNS Tumor Section and Society for Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Rohan Ramakrishna; Gelareh Zadeh; Jason P Sheehan; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  COVID-19 pandemic: Effects and evidence-based recommendations for otolaryngology and head and neck surgery practice.

Authors:  Luiz P Kowalski; Alvaro Sanabria; John A Ridge; Wai Tong Ng; Remco de Bree; Alessandra Rinaldo; Robert P Takes; Antti A Mäkitie; Andre L Carvalho; Carol R Bradford; Vinidh Paleri; Dana M Hartl; Vincent Vander Poorten; Iain J Nixon; Cesare Piazza; Peter D Lacy; Juan P Rodrigo; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; William M Mendenhall; Anil D'Cruz; Anne W M Lee; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients.

Authors:  Lirong Zou; Feng Ruan; Mingxing Huang; Lijun Liang; Huitao Huang; Zhongsi Hong; Jianxiang Yu; Min Kang; Yingchao Song; Jinyu Xia; Qianfang Guo; Tie Song; Jianfeng He; Hui-Ling Yen; Malik Peiris; Jie Wu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Daniele R De Siati; Mihaela Horoi; Serge D Le Bon; Alexandra Rodriguez; Didier Dequanter; Serge Blecic; Fahd El Afia; Lea Distinguin; Younes Chekkoury-Idrissi; Stéphane Hans; Irene Lopez Delgado; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Philippe Lavigne; Chiara Falanga; Maria Rosaria Barillari; Giovanni Cammaroto; Mohamad Khalife; Pierre Leich; Christel Souchay; Camelia Rossi; Fabrice Journe; Julien Hsieh; Myriam Edjlali; Robert Carlier; Laurence Ris; Andrea Lovato; Cosimo De Filippis; Frederique Coppee; Nicolas Fakhry; Tareck Ayad; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: a review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore.

Authors:  Jolin Wong; Qing Yuan Goh; Zihui Tan; Sui An Lie; Yoong Chuan Tay; Shin Yi Ng; Chai Rick Soh
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.713

View more
  7 in total

1.  Aerosolization in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Risk Mitigation in the COVID-19 Era: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Catherine F Roy; Emily Kay-Rivest; Lily H P Nguyen; Denis Sirhan; Marc A Tewfik
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-12-04

2.  ENT surgical emergencies during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Vito Pontillo; Lucia Iannuzzi; Paolo Petrone; Pasqua Irene Sciancalepore; Carlo D'Auria; Massimo Rinaldi; Giusi Graziano; Nicola Quaranta
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  COVID-19 triggering mucormycosis in a susceptible patient: a new phenomenon in the developing world?

Authors:  Shweta Mallikarjun Revannavar; Supriya P S; Laxminarayana Samaga; Vineeth V K
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2021-04-27

Review 4.  CSO (Canadian Society of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery) position paper on rhinologic and skull base surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Yvonne Chan; Sarfaraz M Banglawala; Christopher J Chin; David W J Côté; Dustin Dalgorf; John R de Almeida; Martin Desrosiers; Richard M Gall; Artur Gevorgyan; A Hassan Hassan; Arif Janjua; John M Lee; Randy M Leung; Bradford D Mechor; Dominik Mertz; Eric Monteiro; Smriti Nayan; Brian Rotenberg; John Scott; Kristine A Smith; Doron D Sommer; Leigh Sowerby; Marc A Tewfik; Andrew Thamboo; Allan Vescan; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Surgery under COVID: An observational study.

Authors:  M Durand; H Mirghani; P Bonfils; O Laccourreye
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 6.  Sinus and anterior skull base surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review, synthesis and YO-IFOS position.

Authors:  Thomas Radulesco; Jerome R Lechien; Leigh J Sowerby; Sven Saussez; Carlos Chiesa-Estomba; Zoukaa Sargi; Philippe Lavigne; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Chwee Ming Lim; Napadon Tangjaturonrasme; Patravoot Vatanasapt; Puya Dehgani-Mobaraki; Nicolas Fakhry; Tareck Ayad; Justin Michel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Diagnostic and therapeutic endonasal rhinologic procedures generating aerosol during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematized review.

Authors:  Isha Preet Tuli; Sandeep Trehan; Kirti Khandelwal; Priyanka Chamoli; Sneha Nagendra; Aashish Tomar; Shilpam Sharma
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.