| Literature DB >> 32386295 |
Takaaki B Narita1,2, Yoshinori Kawabe1, Koryu Kin1, Richard A Gibbs3, Adam Kuspa3,4,5, Donna M Muzny3, Stephen Richards3,6, Joan E Strassmann7, Richard Sucgang3,4, Kim C Worley3, Pauline Schaap1.
Abstract
Major phenotypic innovations in social amoeba evolution occurred at the transition between the Polysphondylia and group 4 Dictyostelia, which comprise the model organism Dictyostelium discoideum, such as the formation of a new structure, the basal disk. Basal disk differentiation and robust stalk formation require the morphogen DIF-1, synthesized by the polyketide synthase StlB, the des-methyl-DIF-1 methyltransferase DmtA, and the chlorinase ChlA, which are conserved throughout Dictyostelia. To understand how the basal disk and other innovations evolved in group 4, we sequenced and annotated the Polysphondylium violaceum (Pvio) genome, performed cell type-specific transcriptomics to identify cell-type marker genes, and developed transformation and gene knock-out procedures for Pvio. We used the novel methods to delete the Pvio stlB gene. The Pvio stlB- mutants formed misshapen curly sorogens with thick and irregular stalks. As fruiting body formation continued, the upper stalks became more regular, but structures contained 40% less spores. The stlB- sorogens overexpressed a stalk gene and underexpressed a (pre)spore gene. Normal fruiting body formation and sporulation were restored in Pvio stlB- by including DIF-1 in the supporting agar. These data indicate that, although conserved, stlB and its product(s) acquired both a novel role in the group 4 Dictyostelia and a role opposite to that in its sister group.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Polysphondylium violaceum genome; DIF-1; cell type-specific transcriptome; evolution of novel cell types; genetic transformation; polyketide synthase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32386295 PMCID: PMC7259674 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
Features of Published Dictyostelid Genomes
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contigs/supercontigs | 226/6 | 1,213/799 | 1,228 | 54/54 | 52/41 | 33/25 |
| Total nucleotides (Mb) | 33.9 | 33.0 | 25.7 | 23.4 | 32.9 | 31.0 |
| Average contig length (kb) | 155 | 27 | 21 | 432 | 320 | 1,064 |
| A/T content (%) overall/in CDS | 77.6/72.6 | 75.5/ND | 68.2/65.5 | 70.2/67.8 | 68/63.8 | 66.2/63.2 |
| Coding sequences (CDS) | 13,258 | 12,410 | 10,597 | 10,232 | 11,694 | 12,007 |
| Average gene length | 1,604 | 1,760 | 1,624 | 1,712 | 1,634 | 1,696 |
| Gene density (CDS per Mb) | 396 | 376 | 412 | 437 | 375 | 392 |
| DNA in CDS (Mb) | 21.3 | 21.8 | 17.3 | 17.5 | 18.7 | 20.2 |
| Intergenic DNA (Mb) | 12.6 | 11.2 | 8.4 | 5.8 | 14.2 | 10.8 |
Note.—Genome statistics for Ddis, Dpur, Dlac, Ppal, and Dfas were retrieved from Eichinger et al. (2005), Gloeckner et al. (2016), Sucgang et al. (2011), and Heidel et al. (2011), respectively. ND, not determined. Dlac, Ppal, and Dfas were renamed as Tieghemostelium lacteum, Heterostelium album, and Cavenderia fasciculata in a new classification of Dictyostelia (Sheikh et al. 2018), which may need revision in the near future (Schilde et al. 2019) and is therefore not used here.
. 1.—Conservation of DIF-1 metabolic enzymes across Dictyostelia. Putative orthologs of the DIF-1 metabolic enzymes StlB, DmtA, ChlA and DrcA were retrieved by BlastP search of social ameba genomes and GenBank. Sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega (Sievers and Higgins 2014) with five combined iterations and phylogenetic trees were inferred with MrBayes (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) using a mixed amino acid substitution model with rate variation between sites estimated by a gamma distribution. Bayesian posterior probabilities of the tree nodes are indicated and trees are annotated with the functional domain architecture of the proteins as analyzed by SMART (Schultz et al. 1998). Domains present at E-values above threshold are shown in wash-out color. Gene IDs and locus tags are color coded to reflect the host species as indicated in the dictyostelid core phylogeny (top left), retrieved from Singh et al. (2016). Note that single-gene phylogenies may not strictly follow the species phylogeny, which is based on 47 genes, due to limited phylogenetic signal or clade-specific gene gain and loss.
. 2.—Phenotype of the Pvio stlB mutant. Pvio wild-type and stlB cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C on NN agar at 106 cells/cm2 and then transferred to 22 °C. (A) Developmental morphologies were sequentially photographed at 5, 8, 10, and 30 h at 22 °C. Bars: 1 mm. (B) Stalk formation after 5–8 h at 22 °C, imaged at higher magnification. Bars: 0.2 mm.
. 3.—Stalk and spore gene expression in Pvio stlB. (A) EcmAB1 expression pattern. Pvio wild-type and stlB cells, transformed with the Pv_ecmAB1-lacZ vector, were incubated on nitrocellulose filters supported by NN agar until they had reached the tipped mound (a) and early (b) and late (c) primary sorogen stage. Structures were then fixed and stained with X-gal. Bars: 0.2 mm. (B) Stalk and spore transcript levels. Pvio wild-type and stlB cells were incubated on NN agar at 4 °C overnight and then at 22 °C for 3, 6, 9, and 12 h, when they had reached the indicated stages. Total RNA was isolated and levels of ecmAB1 stalk-specific transcripts, g1612 (pre)spore-specific transcripts, and rpb5 constitutively expressed transcripts were determined by RT-qPCR. Data for ecmAB1 and g1612 were normalized to rpb5 transcript levels and expressed relative to transcript levels at 12 h for wild-type cells. Means and SD of three experiments, assayed with three technical replicates each, are presented. Asterisks indicate significant differences between wild-type and stlB transcript levels (t-test, P<0.05).
. 4.—Effects of DIF-1 on the stlB− phenotype. (A) Development. Pvio wild-type and stlB cells were plated on NN agar with or without 100 nM DIF-1, incubated at 4 °C overnight, and then for 6 h at 22 °C. Bar: 0.2 mm. (B) Sporulation efficiency. Cells were developed on 1 cm2 pieces of filter paper supported by NN agar with or without 100 nM DIF-1. After 2 days, filters with mature fruiting bodies were vortexed vigorously in 1 ml of KK2 and spores were counted. Sporulation efficiency was calculated by dividing the number of spores counted by the total number of cells plated initially. Mean and SD of three experiments performed in duplicate are shown. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks (t-test, P<0.02).