M Lechner1, D Chandrasekharan2, K Jumani2, J Liu3, S Gane4, V J Lund4, C Philpott5, S Jayaraj2. 1. Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK. 2. Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK. 3. UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK. 4. Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, UCLH Foundation Trust, London, UK. 5. The Norfolk Smell and Taste Clinic, Norfolk and Waveney ENT Service, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are at the forefront of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and are at high risk for both the contraction and subsequent spread of virus. Understanding the role of anosmia as an early symptom of infection may improve monitoring and management of SARS-CoV2 infection. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic review of the literature of SARS-CoV2 infection/COVID-19 and anosmia to help inform management of anosmia in healthcare works. We report a case series of healthcare workers, who presented with a loss of sense of smell secondary to COVID-19 infection to demonstrate management principles. RT-PCR was used to confirm COVID-19 positivity and psychophysical testing of olfaction was performed using the British version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, UPSIT. RESULTS: The systematic literature search returned 31 articles eligible for inclusion in the study and informed our recommendations for clinical assessment and management. All three healthcare professionals who presented with loss of sense of smell subsequently tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Psychophysical testing of olfaction using the UPSIT confirmed mild and moderate microsmia in two, respectively, and normosmia at day 17 in one. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory (± gustatory) dysfunction is indicative of COVID-19 infection and thus has important implications in the context of healthcare workers, or key workers in general, who work in close contact with others if not recognised as suffering from COVID. This leads to a potentially higher likelihood of spreading the virus. In conjunction with our literature review these findings have helped with creating recommendations on the assessment and management of olfactory dysfunction during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, both for healthcare workers and patients.
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are at the forefront of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and are at high risk for both the contraction and subsequent spread of virus. Understanding the role of anosmia as an early symptom of infection may improve monitoring and management of SARS-CoV2infection. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic review of the literature of SARS-CoV2infection/COVID-19 and anosmia to help inform management of anosmia in healthcare works. We report a case series of healthcare workers, who presented with a loss of sense of smell secondary to COVID-19infection to demonstrate management principles. RT-PCR was used to confirm COVID-19 positivity and psychophysical testing of olfaction was performed using the British version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, UPSIT. RESULTS: The systematic literature search returned 31 articles eligible for inclusion in the study and informed our recommendations for clinical assessment and management. All three healthcare professionals who presented with loss of sense of smell subsequently tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Psychophysical testing of olfaction using the UPSIT confirmed mild and moderate microsmia in two, respectively, and normosmia at day 17 in one. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory (± gustatory) dysfunction is indicative of COVID-19infection and thus has important implications in the context of healthcare workers, or key workers in general, who work in close contact with others if not recognised as suffering from COVID. This leads to a potentially higher likelihood of spreading the virus. In conjunction with our literature review these findings have helped with creating recommendations on the assessment and management of olfactory dysfunction during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, both for healthcare workers and patients.
Authors: Matt Lechner; Jacklyn Liu; Nicholas Counsell; Ngan Hong Ta; John Rocke; Rajesh Anmolsingh; Nicholas Eynon-Lewis; Santdeep Paun; Claire Hopkins; Sadie Khwaja; B Nirmal Kumar; Samuel Jayaraj; Valerie J Lund; Carl Philpott Journal: Clin Otolaryngol Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Luisa Dudine; Claudia Canaletti; Fabiola Giudici; Alberta Lunardelli; Giulia Abram; Ingrid Santini; Vera Baroni; Marta Paris; Valentina Pesavento; Paolo Manganotti; Federico Ronchese; Barbara Gregoretti; Corrado Negro Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-05-28
Authors: Carmen Riggioni; Pasquale Comberiati; Mattia Giovannini; Ioana Agache; Mübeccel Akdis; Magna Alves-Correia; Josep M Antó; Alessandra Arcolaci; Ahmet Kursat Azkur; Dilek Azkur; Burcin Beken; Cristina Boccabella; Jean Bousquet; Heimo Breiteneder; Daniela Carvalho; Leticia De Las Vecillas; Zuzana Diamant; Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia; Thomas Eiwegger; Stefanie Eyerich; Wytske Fokkens; Ya-Dong Gao; Farah Hannachi; Sebastian L Johnston; Marek Jutel; Aspasia Karavelia; Ludger Klimek; Beatriz Moya; Kari C Nadeau; Robyn O'Hehir; Liam O'Mahony; Oliver Pfaar; Marek Sanak; Jürgen Schwarze; Milena Sokolowska; María J Torres; Willem van de Veen; Menno C van Zelm; De Yun Wang; Luo Zhang; Rodrigo Jiménez-Saiz; Cezmi A Akdis Journal: Allergy Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 14.710
Authors: Jair Vargas-Gandica; Daniel Winter; Rainer Schnippe; Andrea G Rodriguez-Morales; Johana Mondragon; Juan Pablo Escalera-Antezana; María Del Pilar Trelles-Thorne; D Katterine Bonilla-Aldana; Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales; Alberto Paniz-Mondolfi Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 3.739