Literature DB >> 32385598

Effect of real-time virtual reality-based teaching cues on learning needle passing for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Anand Malpani1,2, S Swaroop Vedula3, Henry C Lin4, Gregory D Hager3, Russell H Taylor3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Current virtual reality-based (VR) simulators for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS) training lack effective teaching and coaching. Our objective was to develop an automated teaching framework for VR training in RAMIS. Second, we wanted to study the effect of such real-time teaching cues on surgical technical skill acquisition. Third, we wanted to assess skill in terms of surgical technique in addition to traditional time and motion efficiency metrics.
METHODS: We implemented six teaching cues within a needle passing task on the da Vinci Skills Simulator platform (noncommercial research version). These teaching cues are graphical overlays designed to demonstrate ideal surgical technique, e.g., what path to follow while passing needle through tissue. We created three coaching modes: TEACH (continuous demonstration), METRICS (demonstration triggered by performance metrics), and USER (demonstration upon user request). We conducted a randomized controlled trial where the experimental group practiced using automated teaching and the control group practiced in a self-learning manner without automated teaching.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 30 participants (14 in experimental and 16 in control group). After three practice repetitions, control group showed higher improvement in time and motion efficiency, while experimental group showed higher improvement in surgical technique compared to their baseline measurements. The experimental group showed more improvement than the control group on a surgical technique metric (at what angle is needle grasped by an instrument), and the difference between groups was statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: In a pilot randomized controlled trial, we observed that automated teaching cues can improve the performance of surgical technique in a VR simulator for RAMIS needle passing. Our study was limited by its recruitment of nonsurgeons and evaluation of a single configuration of coaching modes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation and validation; Randomized controlled trial; Surgical robots; Surgical training and assessment; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385598     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-020-02156-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  19 in total

1.  Embracing Errors in Simulation-Based Training: The Effect of Error Training on Retention and Transfer of Central Venous Catheter Skills.

Authors:  Aimee K Gardner; Kareem Abdelfattah; John Wiersch; Rami A Ahmed; Ross E Willis
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater.

Authors:  Aristotelis Dosis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Fernando Bello; Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Duncan Gillies; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-03

3.  Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Jonathan F Finks; Amanda O'Reilly; Mary Oerline; Arthur M Carlin; Andre R Nunn; Justin Dimick; Mousumi Banerjee; Nancy J O Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Randomized controlled trial on the effect of coaching in simulated laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Simon J Cole; Hugh Mackenzie; Joon Ha; George B Hanna; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Navigating credentialing, privileging, and learning curves in robotics with an evidence and experienced-based approach.

Authors:  John P Lenihan
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Hala N Ghousseini; Sudha R Pavuluri Quamme; Heather L Beasley; Douglas A Wiegmann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The value proposition of simulation.

Authors:  Aimee K Gardner; Dmitry Nepomnayshy; Craig Reickert; Denise W Gee; Ryan Brydges; James R Korndorffer; Daniel J Scott; Ajit K Sachdeva
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Optimising surgical training: use of feedback to reduce errors during a simulated surgical procedure.

Authors:  Emily Boyle; Musallam Al-Akash; Anthony G Gallagher; Oscar Traynor; Arnold D K Hill; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  The Effect of Technical Performance on Patient Outcomes in Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andras B Fecso; Peter Szasz; Georgi Kerezov; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Robotics in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: Recommendations for training and credentialing: A report of the 2015 AHNS education committee, AAO-HNS robotic task force and AAO-HNS sleep disorders committee.

Authors:  Neil D Gross; F Christopher Holsinger; J Scott Magnuson; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Eric M Genden; Tamer Ah Ghanem; Kathleen L Yaremchuk; David Goldenberg; Matthew C Miller; Eric J Moore; Luc Gt Morris; James Netterville; Gregory S Weinstein; Jeremy Richmon
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  On the Use of Virtual Reality for Medical Imaging Visualization.

Authors:  Filipi Pires; Carlos Costa; Paulo Dias
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.903

2.  Artificial Intelligence for Intraoperative Guidance: Using Semantic Segmentation to Identify Surgical Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Babak Namazi; Maria S Altieri; Daniel A Hashimoto; Angela Maria Rivera; Philip H Pucher; Allison Navarrete-Welton; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; L Michael Brunt; Allan Okrainec; Adnan Alseidi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 13.787

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.