Literature DB >> 32385188

Validation of serum neurofilaments as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers for ALS.

Michael Benatar1, Lanyu Zhang2, Lily Wang2, Volkan Granit2, Jeffrey Statland2, Richard Barohn2, Andrea Swenson2, John Ravits2, Carlayne Jackson2, Ted M Burns2, Jaya Trivedi2, Erik P Pioro2, James Caress2, Jonathan Katz2, Jacob L McCauley2, Rosa Rademakers2, Andrea Malaspina2, Lyle W Ostrow2, Joanne Wuu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify preferred neurofilament assays and clinically validate serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH) as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers relevant to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development.
METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study of patients with ALS (n = 229), primary lateral sclerosis (n = 20), and progressive muscular atrophy (n = 11), biological specimens were collected, processed, and stored according to strict standard operating procedures (SOPs). Neurofilament assays were performed in a blinded manner by independent contract research organizations.
RESULTS: For serum NfL and pNfH measured using the Simoa assay, there were no missing data (i.e., technical replicates below the lower limit of detection were not encountered). For the Iron Horse and Euroimmun pNfH assays, such missingness was encountered in ∼4% and ∼10% of serum samples, respectively. Mean coefficients of variation for NfL in serum and CSF were both ∼3%. Mean coefficients of variation for pNfH in serum and CSF were ∼4%-5% and ∼2%-3%, respectively, in all assays. Baseline serum NfL concentration, but not pNfH, predicted the future Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) slope and survival. Incorporation of baseline serum NfL into mixed effects models of ALSFRS-R slopes yields an estimated sample size saving of ∼8%. Depending on the method used to estimate effect size, use of serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH) as pharmacodynamic biomarkers, instead of the ALSFRS-R slope, yields significantly larger sample size savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Serum NfL may be considered a clinically validated prognostic biomarker for ALS. Serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH), quantified using the Simoa assay, has potential utility as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of treatment effect.
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385188      PMCID: PMC7371380          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  28 in total

1.  Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS.

Authors:  F Kimura; C Fujimura; S Ishida; H Nakajima; D Furutama; H Uehara; K Shinoda; M Sugino; T Hanafusa
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Serial measurements of phosphorylated neurofilament-heavy in the serum of subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  P A McCombe; C Pfluger; P Singh; C Y H Lim; C Airey; R D Henderson
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Neurofilament light: A candidate biomarker of presymptomatic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and phenoconversion.

Authors:  Michael Benatar; Joanne Wuu; Peter M Andersen; Vittoria Lombardi; Andrea Malaspina
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Multicenter validation of CSF neurofilaments as diagnostic biomarkers for ALS.

Authors:  Patrick Oeckl; Claude Jardel; François Salachas; Foudil Lamari; Peter M Andersen; Robert Bowser; Mamede de Carvalho; Júlia Costa; Philip van Damme; Elizabeth Gray; Julian Grosskreutz; María Hernández-Barral; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; André Huss; Andreas Jeromin; Janine Kirby; Magdalena Kuzma-Kozakiewicz; Maria Del Mar Amador; Jesús S Mora; Claudia Morelli; Petra Muckova; Susanne Petri; Koen Poesen; Heidrun Rhode; Anna-Karin Rikardsson; Wim Robberecht; Ana I Rodríguez Mahillo; Pamela Shaw; Vincenzo Silani; Petra Steinacker; Martin R Turner; Erdem Tüzün; Berrak Yetimler; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.092

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of neurofilament light chain NF-L, but not progranulin and S100B, in the course of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Data from the German MND-net.

Authors:  Petra Steinacker; André Huss; Benjamin Mayer; Torsten Grehl; Julian Grosskreutz; Guntram Borck; Jens Kuhle; Dorothée Lulé; Thomas Meyer; Patrick Oeckl; Susanne Petri; Jochen Weishaupt; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.092

7.  Neurofilament light chain in serum for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Federico Verde; Petra Steinacker; Jochen H Weishaupt; Jan Kassubek; Patrick Oeckl; Steffen Halbgebauer; Hayrettin Tumani; Christine A F von Arnim; Johannes Dorst; Emily Feneberg; Benjamin Mayer; Hans-Peter Müller; Martin Gorges; Angela Rosenbohm; Alexander E Volk; Vincenzo Silani; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa.

Authors:  Jens Kuhle; Christian Barro; Ulf Andreasson; Tobias Derfuss; Raija Lindberg; Åsa Sandelius; Victor Liman; Niklas Norgren; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Neurofilament light chain: A prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Ching-Hua Lu; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Elizabeth Gray; Neil Pearce; Axel Petzold; Niklas Norgren; Gavin Giovannoni; Pietro Fratta; Katie Sidle; Mark Fish; Richard Orrell; Robin Howard; Kevin Talbot; Linda Greensmith; Jens Kuhle; Martin R Turner; Andrea Malaspina
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Neurofilament as a potential biomarker for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Basil T Darras; Thomas O Crawford; Richard S Finkel; Eugenio Mercuri; Darryl C De Vivo; Maryam Oskoui; Eduardo F Tizzano; Monique M Ryan; Francesco Muntoni; Guolin Zhao; John Staropoli; Alexander McCampbell; Marco Petrillo; Christopher Stebbins; Stephanie Fradette; Wildon Farwell; Charlotte J Sumner
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.511

View more
  37 in total

1.  Prognostic models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lu Xu; Bingjie He; Yunjing Zhang; Lu Chen; Dongsheng Fan; Siyan Zhan; Shengfeng Wang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Circulating miR-181 is a prognostic biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Iddo Magen; Nancy Sarah Yacovzada; Eran Yanowski; Anna Coenen-Stass; Julian Grosskreutz; Ching-Hua Lu; Linda Greensmith; Andrea Malaspina; Pietro Fratta; Eran Hornstein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Radicava/Edaravone Findings in Biomarkers From Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (REFINE-ALS): Protocol and Study Design.

Authors:  James Berry; Benjamin Brooks; Angela Genge; Terry Heiman-Patterson; Stanley Appel; Michael Benatar; Robert Bowser; Merit Cudkowicz; Clifton Gooch; Jeremy Shefner; Jurjen Westra; Wendy Agnese; Charlotte Merrill; Sally Nelson; Stephen Apple
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08

4.  Biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy in adolescents and adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Gavriilaki; Vasileios Papaliagkas; Alexandra Stamperna; Maria Moschou; Konstantinos Notas; Sotirios Papagiannopoulos; Marianthi Arnaoutoglou; Vasilios K Kimiskidis
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Increased NF-L levels in the TDP-43G298S ALS mouse model resemble NF-L levels in ALS patients.

Authors:  Eva Buck; Patrick Oeckl; Veselin Grozdanov; Verena Bopp; Julia K Kühlwein; Wolfgang P Ruf; Diana Wiesner; Francesco Roselli; Jochen H Weishaupt; Albert C Ludolph; Markus Otto; Karin M Danzer
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 15.887

Review 6.  Molecular Biomarkers and Their Implications for the Early Diagnosis of Selected Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Julia Doroszkiewicz; Magdalena Groblewska; Barbara Mroczko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  A Novel Neurofilament Light Chain ELISA Validated in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and Subjective Cognitive Decline, and the Evaluation of Candidate Proteins for Immunoassay Calibration.

Authors:  Shreyasee Das; Nele Dewit; Dirk Jacobs; Yolande A L Pijnenburg; Sjors G J G In 't Veld; Salomé Coppens; Milena Quaglia; Christophe Hirtz; Charlotte E Teunissen; Eugeen Vanmechelen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  RNA as a source of biomarkers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Lily Kiaei; Mahmoud Kiaei
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.655

9.  FGF23, a novel muscle biomarker detected in the early stages of ALS.

Authors:  Ying Si; Mohamed Kazamel; Michael Benatar; Joanne Wuu; Yuri Kwon; Thaddaeus Kwan; Nan Jiang; Dominik Kentrup; Christian Faul; Lyndsy Alesce; Peter H King
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Hypermetabolism associated with worse prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Jiayu Fu; Ji He; Wei Zhao; Chuan Ren; Ping Liu; Lu Chen; Dan Li; Lu Tang; Lequn Zhou; Yixuan Zhang; Xinran Ma; Gaoqi Zhang; Nan Li; Dongsheng Fan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.