| Literature DB >> 32384768 |
Ksenija Vujacic-Mirski1, Kai Bruns2, Sanela Kalinovic1, Matthias Oelze1, Swenja Kröller-Schön1, Sebastian Steven1, Milos Mojovic3, Bato Korac4, Thomas Münzel1,5, Andreas Daiber1,5.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) cause oxidative damage, which is associated with endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, but may also contribute to redox signaling. Therefore, their precise detection is important for the evaluation of disease mechanisms. Here, we compared three different methods for the detection of 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT), a marker of nitro-oxidative stress, in biological samples. Nitrated proteins were generated by incubation with peroxynitrite or 3-morpholino sydnonimine (Sin-1) and subjected to total hydrolysis using pronase, a mixture of different proteases. The 3-NT was then separated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and quantified by electrochemical detection (ECD, CoulArray) and compared to classical methods, namely enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dot blot analysis using specific 3-NT antibodies. Calibration curves for authentic 3-NT (detection limit 10 nM) and a concentration-response pattern for 3-NT obtained from digested nitrated bovine serum albumin (BSA) were highly linear over a wide 3-NT concentration range. Also, ex vivo nitration of protein from heart, isolated mitochondria, and serum/plasma could be quantified using the HPLC/ECD method and was confirmed by LC-MS/MS. Of note, nitro-oxidative damage of mitochondria results in increased superoxide (O2•-) formation rates (measured by dihydroethidium-based HPLC assay), pointing to a self-amplification mechanism of oxidative stress. Based on our ex vivo data, the CoulArray quantification method for 3-NT seems to have some advantages regarding sensitivity and selectivity. Establishing a reliable automated HPLC assay for the routine quantification of 3-NT in biological samples of cell culture, of animal and human origin seems to be more sophisticated than expected.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC with electrochemical detection; mitochondrial superoxide; oxidative stress; peroxynitrite; protein-bound 3-nitrotyrosine
Year: 2020 PMID: 32384768 PMCID: PMC7278855 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9050388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Detection of authentic 3-NT standards by HPLC/ECD. (A) The coulometric signal for 3-NT increased for the applied potentials from 650 to 800 mV as shown by the representative chromatograms. (B) The sensitivity of the HPLC/ECD analysis was good and a concentration of 25 nM 3-NT was easily detectable as shown by the representative chromatograms. (C) The calibration curve was highly linear over a concentration range of 10–500 nM. Analysis was carried on with 20 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution using a flow of 1 mL/min and a mobile phase consisting of 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 4.75 with 2.8 v/v% methanol (RT of 3-NT was observed at 6.2 min).
Figure 2Detection of free 3-NT from nitrated BSA by HPLC/ECD and comparison with detection of BSA-bound 3-NT by antibody-based methods. Purified BSA was nitrated by Sin-1 or PN (10–1000 µM) and generated 3-NT was reduced by dTH. These samples were subjected to pronase digest before HPLC/ECD analysis (A) or were not digested for quantification by dot blot (C) and ELISA (E). (B) Representative chromatograms are shown for the HPLC/ECD quantification. (D) Representative blots are shown for the dot blot quantification. Equal protein loading was checked by Ponceau staining of the membrane. HPLC/ECD analysis was performed with 20 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution (1 mL/min, mobile phase: 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 4.75 with 2.8 v/v% methanol; 3-NT eluted at 6.2 min). Data are presented as mean ± SD of n = 9 (A), 9 (C) and 4 (E) independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 versus BSA untreated control group; # indicates p < 0.05 versus 1000 µM Sin-1/PN group.
Figure 3Detection of free 3-NT from nitrated heart proteins by HPLC/ECD. Heart homogenates were nitrated by Sin-1 and generated 3-NT was reduced by dTH. These samples were subjected to pronase digest before HPLC/ECD analysis. (A) Representative chromatogram of authentic 3-NT standard. (B) Representative chromatograms of Sin-1 treated heart proteins after digest with or without dTH. (C) Spiking of potential 3-NT peak with low concentrations of authentic 3-NT standard to proof the identity of this peak. HPLC/ECD analysis was performed with 20 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution (1.3 mL/min, mobile phase: 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 4.85 with 3.25 v/v% methanol; 3-NT eluted at 4.39 min).
Figure 4Detection of free 3-NT from nitrated plasma proteins by HPLC/ECD. Plasma was nitrated by Sin-1 and generated 3-NT was reduced by dTH. These samples were subjected to pronase digest before HPLC/ECD analysis. (A) Representative chromatogram of authentic 3-NT standard. (B) Representative chromatograms of Sin-1 treated plasma proteins after digest with or without dTH. (C) Spiking of potential 3-NT peak with low concentrations of authentic 3-NT standard to proof the identity of this peak. (D) Quantification of 3-NT yield of experiments shown in panels (B,C). HPLC/ECD analysis was performed with 20 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution (1.3 mL/min, mobile phase: 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 4.75 with 3 v/v% methanol; 3-NT eluted at 4.76 min).
Figure 5Detection of free 3-NT from nitrated liver mitochondria by HPLC/ECD or HPLC/UV. Isolated liver mitochondria were nitrated by PN (50–500 µM). These samples were subjected to pronase digest before HPLC/ECD analysis (A) or HPLC/UV analysis (C). Representative chromatograms are shown for the HPLC/ECD quantification (B) or the HPLC/UV quantification (D). HPLC/ECD analysis was performed with 20 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution (1 mL/min, mobile phase: 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 3.75 with 3.5 v/v% methanol; 3-NT eluted at 4.05 min). Data are presented as mean ± SD of n = 3–5 (A) and 3–5 (C) independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 versus Mito untreated control group.
Figure 6Detection of free 3-NT from control and diabetic animals with and without combined nitration by Sin-1. Kidney homogenates of healthy control and diabetic (ZDF) rats (10 mg/mL protein) were subjected to pronase digest before HPLC/ECD analysis or LC-MS/MS analysis. A special digestion protocol was used (see Methods for kidney samples). HPLC/ECD analysis was performed with 40 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution (0.75 mL/min, mobile phase: 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 3.75; 3-NT eluted at 7.03 min). Representative chromatograms are shown for the HPLC/ECD quantification (A) or LC-MS/MS analysis (B). LC-MS/MS analysis was performed after adding an identical amount of deuterated 3-NT (D3-3-NT) to compensate for matrix effects. Mass transitions monitored at 227 → 117 (3-NT) and 230 → 119 (D3-NT) are shown. Representative MS/MS spectra of precursor ion at m/z = 227 are shown for the 3-NT standard (100 nM) and the sample from ZDF rat with 1 mM Sin-1 treatment (C).
Figure 7Detection of superoxide generation by mitochondria by mitoSOX HPLC and correlation with 3-NT levels. Isolated heart mitochondria were nitrated by PN at concentrations of 50–250 µM. These samples were split, one aliquot was used for measurement of mitochondrial superoxide formation using mitoSOX/HPLC and the other aliquot for determination of free 3-NT levels by HPLC/ECD after digestion. Mitochondrial superoxide formation was determined using HPLC-based quantification of 2-OH-mito-E+ (A) and ROS formation was measured using a fluorescence plate reader assay for the mitoSOX oxidation products (B). The yield of mitochondrial 3-NT was correlated with superoxide formation rate for the different PN-treated samples (C). HPLC/ECD analysis was performed with 20 µL of sample at 27 °C with isocratic elution (1 mL/min, mobile phase: 26.3 mM sodium citrate and 10.9 mM sodium at pH 3.75 with 3.5 v/v% methanol; 3-NT eluted at 4.05 min). Data are presented as mean ± SD of n = 3–5 (A); n = 4 (B) and n = 8 (C) independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 versus Mito untreated control group.