| Literature DB >> 32384655 |
Xungang Wang1,2, Tianwei Xu1, Xiaoling Zhang1,2, Yuanyue Geng1,2, Shengping Kang1,2, Shixiao Xu1.
Abstract
Dietary protein is a critical nutrient that directly influences the health and production of livestock. Recent studies showed that protein supplements could enhance the growth performance of Tibetan sheep. However, there is a lack of information regarding the influence of dietary protein levels on carcass traits and meat composition. This study investigated the effects of dietary protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, serum metabolites, and meat composition in Tibetan sheep during the cold season on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. A total of eighteen 1-year-old, healthy, castrated Tibetan sheep with similar initial body weights (31.7 ± 0.72 kg) were randomly divided into three treatment groups with different dietary protein level (low protein (LP, 10.1%); medium protein (MP, 12.1%); high protein (HP, 14.1%)) diets. The results indicated that the Tibetan sheep fed with the MP and HP diets had greater final body weights (BWs), average daily gains (ADGs), and average daily feed intakes (ADFIs) (p < 0.05). The MP and HP diets also improved the hot carcass weight, net meat (including the fat) weight, and bone weight of the sheep significantly (p < 0.05). Besides, the dietary protein levels could significantly affect the serum concentrations of growth hormone (p < 0.05). The diameter of muscle fibers in the MP group was significantly greater than that in the LP group (p < 0.05), while the density of muscle fibers showed the opposite trend. The dietary protein levels only significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the ether extract content and profile content of the longissimus dorsi muscle but had no effect on other parameters of meat composition. In summary, our results indicate that dietary protein levels affect growth performance, carcass traits, and meat composition and that diets containing 12.1% and 14.1% protein are recommended to obtain better production performance and meat products in Tibetan sheep, rather than a diet containing 10.1% protein, during the cold season on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Entities:
Keywords: Tibetan sheep; carcass traits; growth performance; meat composition; protein; serum metabolites
Year: 2020 PMID: 32384655 PMCID: PMC7277202 DOI: 10.3390/ani10050801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Ingredients and nutrient levels of the experimental diets with three different protein levels (on a dry matter basis).
| Item | Diet 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LP | MP | HP | |
| Ingredients, g/kg | |||
| Oat hay | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| Corn grain | 210 | 165 | 120 |
| Wheat grain | 135 | 120 | 105 |
| Wheat bran | 70 | 75 | 80 |
| Soybean meal | 35 | 55 | 75 |
| Rapeseed meal | 25 | 60 | 95 |
| NaCl | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| CaHPO4·2H2O | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Bentonite | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| CaCo3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| NaHCO3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Premix 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Nutrient levels 3 | |||
| CP (%) | 10.1 | 12.1 | 14.1 |
| ME (MJ/kg) | 10.1 | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| EE (%) | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| NDF (%) | 37.5 | 38.5 | 39.5 |
| ADF (%) | 19.1 | 20.1 | 21.1 |
| Ca (%) | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| P (%) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
1 LP: low protein; MP: medium protein; HP: high protein. 2 Premix provided per kg of feed: Vitamin A, 50,000 IU; Vitamin D3, 12,500 IU; Vitamin E, 1000 IU; Cu, 250 mg; Fe, 12,000 mg; Zn, 1000 mg; Mn, 1000 mg; and Se, 7.5 mg. 3 ME: metabolizable energy = total digestible nutrients × 0.04409 × 0.82, according the National Research Council [14]; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; NDF: neutral detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber.
Effects of three different dietary protein levels on growth performance in Tibetan sheep (n = 6 per group).
| Parameter 1 | Treatments | SEM 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP | MP | HP | |||
| 1–35 d | |||||
| Initial BW, kg | 31.6 | 32.1 | 31.3 | 0.17 | 0.123 |
| Final BW, kg | 36.3 | 38.1 | 37.2 | 0.42 | 0.221 |
| ADG, g/d | 133.8 | 169.8 | 167.9 | 13.26 | 0.488 |
| ADFI, g/d | 797 c | 926 a | 870 b | 0.01 | 0.000 |
| F/G | 5.99 | 5.55 | 5.24 | 0.33 | 0.669 |
| 36–70 d | |||||
| Initial BW, kg | 36.3 | 38.1 | 37.2 | 0.42 | 0.221 |
| Final BW, kg | 41.4 b | 45.3 a | 42.7 ab | 0.58 | 0.010 |
| ADG, g/d | 144.8 | 204.5 | 155.5 | 13.12 | 0.139 |
| ADFI, g/d | 1268 b | 1465 a | 1289 b | 0.03 | 0.001 |
| F/G | 8.74 | 7.28 | 8.30 | 0.27 | 0.063 |
| 71–105 d | |||||
| Initial BW, kg | 41.4 b | 45.3 a | 42.7 ab | 0.58 | 0.010 |
| Final BW, kg | 47.8 b | 55.7 a | 52.8 a | 1.00 | 0.001 |
| ADG, g/d | 184.3 b | 297.1 a | 291.0 a | 17.39 | 0.004 |
| ADFI, g/d | 1518 b | 1880 a | 1783 a | 0.04 | 0.000 |
| F/G | 8.39 a | 6.43 b | 6.19 b | 0.35 | 0.011 |
| 1–105 d | |||||
| Initial BW, kg | 31.6 | 32.1 | 31.3 | 0.17 | 0.123 |
| Final BW, kg | 47.8 b | 55.7 a | 52.8 a | 1.00 | 0.001 |
| ADG, g/d | 154.3 b | 223.8 a | 204.8 a | 9.51 | 0.002 |
| ADFI, g/d | 1195 c | 1424 a | 1314 b | 23.13 | 0.000 |
| F/G | 7.87 a | 6.33 b | 6.53 b | 0.27 | 0.033 |
Values are expressed as means. 1 BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake; F/G, feed/gain ratio. 2 SEM = standard error of the mean. a, b, c Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Effects of three different dietary protein levels on carcass traits in Tibetan sheep (n = 4 per group).
| Parameter | Treatments | SEM 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP | MP | HP | |||
| Live weight, kg | 47.8 b | 54.0 a | 53.5 a | 0.993 | 0.002 |
| Hot carcass weight, kg | 22.20 b | 26.91 a | 26.19 a | 0.747 | 0.005 |
| Carcass yield, % | 46.48 | 49.82 | 48.97 | 0.732 | 0.156 |
| Net meat (including the fat) weight, kg | 17.41 b | 21.05 a | 19.95 a | 0.568 | 0.009 |
| Net meat (including the fat) yield, % | 36.46 | 38.96 | 37.31 | 0.588 | 0.224 |
| Bone weight, kg | 4.79 b | 5.86 a | 6.24 a | 0.205 | 0.001 |
| Bone/meat | 0.27 b | 0.28 b | 0.31 a | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Values are expressed as means. 1 SEM = standard error of the mean. a, b Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Effects of three different dietary protein levels on serum metabolites in Tibetan sheep (n = 6 per group).
| Parameter | Treatments | SEM 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP | MP | HP | |||
| Growth hormone (GH), ng/mL | 32.5 b | 36.1 a | 35.5 a | 2.05 | 0.001 |
| Total protein (TP), g/L | 69.0 | 69.2 | 70.9 | 2.55 | 0.136 |
| Albumin (ALB), g/L | 35.4 | 36.4 | 36.1 | 1.63 | 0.342 |
| Glucose (GLU), mmol/L | 4.68 | 4.82 | 4.81 | 0.35 | 0.561 |
| Globulin (GLO), g/L | 33.6 | 32.8 | 34.8 | 2.97 | 0.236 |
| Total cholesterol (TCH), mmol/L | 1.46 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 0.29 | 0.140 |
| Triglyceride (TG), mmol/L | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.664 |
| Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (ALT), U/L | 19.6 | 17.2 | 19.3 | 5.02 | 0.458 |
| Glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase (AST), U/L | 108.8 | 115.2 | 102.7 | 22.85 | 0.420 |
Values are expressed as means. 1 SEM = standard error of the mean. a, b Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Effects of the three different dietary protein levels on the histological characteristics of longissimus dorsi muscle in Tibetan sheep. (A) Diameter of muscle fibers. (B) Perimeter of muscle fibers. (C) Area of muscle fibers. (D) Density of muscle fibers. a, b Indicate significant differences among three groups.
Effects of three different dietary protein levels on the nutrient contents of the longissimus dorsi muscle in Tibetan sheep (n = 4 per group).
| Parameter | Treatments | SEM 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP | MP | HP | |||
| Dry matter, % | 24.09 | 26.39 | 24.86 | 0.465 | 0.113 |
| Crude protein, % | 18.63 | 19.38 | 19.27 | 0.205 | 0.287 |
| Ether extract, % | 2.48 b | 3.43 a | 2.68 ab | 0.169 | 0.033 |
| Crude ash, % | 1.02 | 1.09 | 0.99 | 0.024 | 0.236 |
Values are expressed as means. 1 SEM = standard error of the mean. a, b Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Effects of three different dietary protein levels on the amino acid profile of longissimus dorsi muscle in Tibetan sheep (n = 4 per group).
| Amino Acid 1 | Treatments | SEM 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP | MP | HP | |||
| Threonine, % | 3.89 | 3.77 | 4.03 | 0.05 | 0.101 |
| Valine, % | 4.26 | 4.13 | 4.19 | 0.04 | 0.495 |
| Methionine, % | 2.15 | 2.21 | 2.22 | 0.04 | 0.821 |
| Leucine, % | 4.13 | 4.02 | 4.15 | 0.05 | 0.582 |
| Leucine, % | 6.96 | 6.83 | 7.16 | 0.09 | 0.325 |
| Phenylalanine, % | 3.51 | 3.46 | 4.03 | 0.14 | 0.208 |
| Histidine, % | 4.20 | 3.88 | 3.84 | 0.09 | 0.197 |
| Lysine, % | 7.29 | 7.55 | 7.58 | 0.09 | 0.393 |
| Asparticacid, % | 7.80 | 7.64 | 8.00 | 0.09 | 0.284 |
| Serine, % | 3.29 | 3.18 | 3.44 | 0.05 | 0.050 |
| Glutamicacid, % | 14.77 | 14.22 | 15.00 | 0.19 | 0.235 |
| Glycine, % | 3.51 | 3.44 | 3.62 | 0.05 | 0.255 |
| Alanine, % | 4.82 | 4.70 | 4.90 | 0.06 | 0.365 |
| Cystine, % | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.236 |
| Tyrosine, % | 3.04 | 2.91 | 3.40 | 0.12 | 0.249 |
| Arginine, % | 5.14 | 4.92 | 5.32 | 0.08 | 0.159 |
| Proline, % | 2.75 bc | 2.73 b | 2.98 a | 0.04 | 0.004 |
| EAA, % | 36.38 | 35.85 | 37.20 | 0.31 | 0.218 |
| NEAA, % | 45.36 | 43.90 | 46.82 | 0.56 | 0.091 |
| TAA, % | 78.99 | 77.02 | 81.04 | 0.82 | 0.134 |
Values are expressed as means. 1 EAA, essential amino acids; NEAA, nonessential amino acids; TAA, total amino acids. 2 SEM = standard error of the mean. a, b, c Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p < 0.05.