| Literature DB >> 32384647 |
Larissa Alves de Castro1, Jaqueline Miranda Lizi1, Eduardo Galvão Leite das Chagas1, Rosemary Aparecida de Carvalho1, Fernanda Maria Vanin1.
Abstract
In the orange juice industry, more than 50% of raw material becomes by-products that are rich in active compounds and have high nutritional content. Improved use of these by-products could represent a key strategy for a circular economy. The objective of this study was to produce a flour from orange juice by-product, characterize it, and then apply this flour to produce cookies. Orange by-product flour (OBPF) was characterized in terms of its chemical composition, dietary fiber, phenolic compounds, antioxidant potential, and hygroscopic properties. Subsequently, the effect of substituting wheat flour by OBPF in cookies was evaluated. OBPF presented a very high content of dietary fiber (73.61% dry matter (DM)), minerals (ash = 2.72% DM), and total phenolic compounds (534 ± 30 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/100 g of DM). In general, the properties of cookies were not significantly influenced by using OBPF as a substitution for wheat flour. Sensorial analyses showed that cookies produced with 10% OBPF presented the higher scores. Therefore, OBPF showed interesting characteristics, suggesting its possible use in the development of fiber enriched foods such as cookies; and its production represents a key strategy for the orange juice processing industries towards the application of a circular economy in the food system.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant properties; dietary fiber; environmental waste; minerals; phenolic compounds
Year: 2020 PMID: 32384647 PMCID: PMC7278819 DOI: 10.3390/foods9050593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Cookie dough composition for different levels of wheat flour substitution with orange by-product flour (OBPF).
| Ingredients (g) | Level of Wheat Flour Substitution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
| Wheat flour | 238.50 | 226.57 | 214.65 | 202.73 | 190.80 |
| OBPF | 0 | 11.93 | 23.85 | 35.77 | 47.70 |
| Margarine | 43.5 | 43.5 | 43.5 | 43.5 | 43.5 |
| Brown sugar | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 |
| Sugar | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 | 86 |
| Water | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Chemical leavener | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Results from the different analysis of the orange by-product flour produced.
| Analysis/Component | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical composition | Water content (g/100 g of DM *) | 10.38 ± 0.36 |
| Protein (g/100 g of DM) | 5.94 ± 0.1 | |
| Fat (g/100 g of DM) | 0.33 ± 0.1 | |
| Ash (g/100 g of DM) | 2.72 ± 0.02 | |
| Dietary fiber (g/100 g of DM) | 73.61 | |
| Glycidic fraction (g/100 g of DM) | 80.63 | |
| Antioxidant properties | Phenolic compound (mg GAE/100g of DM) ** | 534 ± 30 |
| FRAP (µmolTEq/100 g of DM) *** | 93 ± 5 | |
| ORAC (µmolTEq/100 g of DM) *** | 11,728 ± 541 | |
| Functional properties | WAI (g of water/g of DM) | 13.28 ± 0.50 |
| OAI (g of oil/g of DM) | 2.78 ± 0.02 | |
| WSI (%) | 9.94 | |
| Microstructure | SEM image at 500× magnification |
|
* DM, dry matter; ** GAE, gallic acid equivalent; and *** TE, trolox equivalent.
The HPLC-DAD-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS analysis of phenolic compounds (flavonols) in orange by-product flour, retention times (RT), mass spectrum data.
| N° | RT | [M-H]-( | MS2 ( | Compound |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.8 | 609.1467 | 519/489/429/399/369.0601 | Luteolin 6,8-di-C-glucoside |
| 2 | 7.6 | 593.1517 | 473/353/383/353/325.0666/297 | Apigenin 6,8-di-C-glycopyranoside (Vicenin-2) |
| 3 | 7.8 | 623.1613 | 503/413/383/355/312.0646 | Chrysoeriol 6,8-di-C-glucoside (Stellarin 2) |
| 4 | 8.2 | 623.1635 | 503/413/383/355/312.0659 | Chrysoeriol 6,8-di-C-glucoside (Stellarin 2) |
| 5 | 9.6 | 563.1427 | 413/293.0459 | - |
| 6 | 10.0 | 609.1488 | 300.0288/151 | Quercetin 3- |
| 7 | 11.7 | 579.1741 | 271.0613/151 | Naringenin-7-hesperidoside (Naringin) |
| 8 | 13.0 | 609.1831 | 301.0717/164 | Hesperetin 7- |
Figure 1Photographs of cookies formulated using different levels of wheat flour substitution with orange by-product flour (OBPF). (a) control; (b) 5%; (c) 10%; (d) 15%; and (e) 20%; (1) upper image; and (2) cross-sectional image.
Physical characteristics and sensorial analysis results of cookies produced by wheat flour substitution with orange by-product flour at different levels.
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Diameter (mm) | 54.05 ± 0.7 b | 53.14 ± 1 ab | 53.07 ± 1 ab | 53.58 ± 0.8 ab | 52.55 ± 0.8 a |
| Height (mm) | 12.63 ± 0.8 b | 12.39 ± 0.4 ab | 12.15 ± 0.5 ab | 11.78 ± 0.6 a | 11.82 ± 0.7 a |
| Spread factor (SF) | 4.96 ± 0.3 a | 4.29 ± 0.2 a | 4.38 ± 0.3 a | 4.56 ± 0.3 a | 4.46 ± 0.2 a |
| Specific volume (mL/g) | 1.56 ± 0.04 c | 1.50 ± 0.1 b | 1.55 ± 0.04 c | 1.48 ± 0.03 b | 1.38 ± 0.03 a |
| Hardness (N) | 101.01 ± 22 a | 114.0 ± 20 a | 117.0 ± 15 a | 176.9 ± 45 b | 275.6 ± 37 c |
| L* | 64.19 ± 8 b | 61.68 ± 5 ab | 60.82 ± 7 ab | 57.71 ± 3 a | 56.20 ± 4 a |
| Chroma a* | 8.94 ± 0.7 a | 10.01 ± 2 a | 10.19 ± 2 a | 8.93 ± 1 a | 9.60 ± 0.9 a |
| Chroma b* | 28.98 ± 2 a | 29.63 ± 4 a | 29.45 ± 4 a | 26.83 ± 0.9 a | 27.22 ± 2 a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Color | 6.42 ± 1.5 ab | 6.68 ± 1.6 bc | 7.05 ± 1.4 c | 6.00 ± 1.6 a | 6.65 ± 1.5 bc |
| Aroma | 6.53 ± 1.5 ab | 6.82 ± 1.4 bc | 6.98 ± 1.4 c | 6.14 ± 1.4 a | 6.55 ± 1.5 ab |
| Texture | 6.41 ± 1.9 c | 6.27 ± 1.8 c | 6.48 ± 1.9 c | 4.71 ± 2.1a | 5.5 ± 2.2 b |
| Flavor | 6.62 ± 1.7 bc | 7.04 ± 1.4 cd | 7.16 ± 1.5 d | 5.81 ± 1.8 a | 6.52 ± 1.6 b |
| Overall acceptability | 6.66 ± 1.5bc | 6.81 ± 1.4 c | 7.07 ± 1.3 c | 5.52 ± 1.6 a | 6.35 ± 1.5 b |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by different letter in the same line are significantly different at 95% confidence level. * scale between 1 and 9 (9 = “liked extremely” and 1 = “disliked extremely”).
Figure 2Images obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of cookies produced by wheat flour substitution with orange by-product flour (OBPF), at magnifications of 50×, 100× and 500×.
Mean values obtained from the transition temperatures (Ts, start temperature; To, onset temperature; Tm, maximum temperature; and Tstop, final temperature) and the enthalpy of the cookie with different concentrations of orange by-product flour (OBPF).
| Level of Wheat Flour Substitution | Temperature (°C) | ΔH (J/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ts | To | Tm | Tstop | ||
| 0 | 105.16 ± 5.62 a | 108.9 ± 7.01 a | 131.01 ± 5.29 a | 156.71 ± 1.18 a | 4.30 ± 0.38 a |
| 5 | 111.46 ± 6.95 a | 118.06 ± 3.03 b | 131.81± 3.49 a | 158.00 ± 2.56 a | 4.18 ± 0.17 a |
| 10 | 108.23 ± 4.44 a | 112.59 ± 3.26 ab | 128.14 ± 2.18 a | 157.39 ± 2.75 a | 5.67 ± 0.25 b |
| 15 | 110.11 ± 4.57 a | 113.92 ± 5.28 ab | 130.32 ± 0.67 a | 156.14 ± 0.25 a | 4.40 ± 1.16 a |
| 20 | 111.59 ± 0.46 a | 116.70 ± 0.55 ab | 131.90 ± 0.73 a | 157.39 ± 1.78 a | 4.11 ± 0.55 a |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Values followed by the same letter in the same line are not significantly different at 95% confidence level.