Literature DB >> 32381587

The Dysregulated Pharmacology of Clinically Relevant ESR1 Mutants is Normalized by Ligand-activated WT Receptor.

Kaitlyn J Andreano1, Jennifer G Baker1, Sunghee Park1, Rachid Safi1, Sandeep Artham1, Steffi Oesterreich2,3, Rinath Jeselsohn4, Myles Brown4, Sarah Sammons5, Suzanne E Wardell1, Ching-Yi Chang1, John D Norris1, Donald P McDonnell6.   

Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) is expressed in a majority of breast cancers and drugs that inhibit ER signaling are the cornerstone of breast cancer pharmacotherapy. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are the frontline endocrine interventions of choice although their durability in metastatic disease is limited by activating point mutations within the ligand-binding domain of ESR1 that permit ligand-independent activation of the receptor. It has been suggested that the most commonly occurring ESR1 mutations would likely compromise the clinical activity of selective estrogen receptor downregulators and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) when used as second-line therapies. It was unclear, however, how these mutations, which are likely coexpressed in cells with ERWT, may impact response to ER ligands in a clinically meaningful manner. To address this issue, we dissected the molecular mechanism(s) underlying ESR1-mutant pharmacology in models relevant to metastatic disease. These studies revealed that the response of ESR1 mutations to ligands was dictated primarily by the relative coexpression of ERWT in cells. Specifically, dysregulated pharmacology was only evident in cells in which the mutants were overexpressed relative to ligand-activated ERWT; a finding that highlights the role of allelism in determining ER-mutant pharmacology. Importantly, we demonstrated that the antagonist activity of the SERM, lasofoxifene, was not impacted by mutant status; a finding that has led to its clinical evaluation as a treatment for patients with advanced ER-positive breast cancer whose tumors harbor ESR1 mutations. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32381587      PMCID: PMC7335351          DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  59 in total

1.  Breast cancer: aromatase inhibitors take on tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Widespread Selection for Oncogenic Mutant Allele Imbalance in Cancer.

Authors:  Craig M Bielski; Mark T A Donoghue; Mayur Gadiya; Aphrothiti J Hanrahan; Helen H Won; Matthew T Chang; Philip Jonsson; Alexander V Penson; Alexander Gorelick; Christopher Harris; Alison M Schram; Aijazuddin Syed; Ahmet Zehir; Paul B Chapman; David M Hyman; David B Solit; Kevin Shannon; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Michael F Berger; Barry S Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  Comparative analyses of mechanistic differences among antiestrogens.

Authors:  A L Wijayaratne; S C Nagel; L A Paige; D J Christensen; J D Norris; D M Fowlkes; D P McDonnell
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  A First-in-Human Study of the New Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader AZD9496 for ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Erika P Hamilton; Manish R Patel; Anne C Armstrong; Richard D Baird; Komal Jhaveri; Matthias Hoch; Teresa Klinowska; Justin P O Lindemann; Shethah R Morgan; Gaia Schiavon; Hazel M Weir; Seock-Ah Im
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Discovery of LSZ102, a Potent, Orally Bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) for the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  George S Tria; Tinya Abrams; Jason Baird; Heather E Burks; Brant Firestone; L Alex Gaither; Lawrence G Hamann; Guo He; Christina A Kirby; Sunkyu Kim; Franco Lombardo; Kaitlin J Macchi; Donald P McDonnell; Yuji Mishina; John D Norris; Jill Nunez; Clayton Springer; Yingchuan Sun; Noel M Thomsen; Chunrong Wang; Jianling Wang; Bing Yu; Choi-Lai Tiong-Yip; Stefan Peukert
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Constitutively active ESR1 mutations in gynecologic malignancies and clinical response to estrogen-receptor directed therapies.

Authors:  Stéphanie L Gaillard; Kaitlyn J Andreano; Laurie M Gay; Meghan Steiner; Matthew S Jorgensen; Brittany Anne Davidson; Laura J Havrilesky; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Fidel A Valea; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Deborah A Zajchowski; Ching-Yi Chang; Donald P McDonnell; Andrew Berchuck; Julia A Elvin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Identification of a negative regulatory surface within estrogen receptor alpha provides evidence in support of a role for corepressors in regulating cellular responses to agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Huey-Jing Huang; John D Norris; Donald P McDonnell
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2002-08

8.  Pharmacokinetic profile of intramuscular fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  John F R Robertson; Bjorn Erikstein; Kent C Osborne; John Pippen; Steven E Come; Leroy M Parker; Stan Gertler; Mike P Harrison; David A Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Gaia Schiavon; Sarah Hrebien; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Rosalind J Cutts; Alex Pearson; Noelia Tarazona; Kerry Fenwick; Iwanka Kozarewa; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Ricardo Ribas; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Lesley-Ann Martin; Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Mutation site and context dependent effects of ESR1 mutation in genome-edited breast cancer cell models.

Authors:  Amir Bahreini; Zheqi Li; Peilu Wang; Kevin M Levine; Nilgun Tasdemir; Lan Cao; Hazel M Weir; Shannon L Puhalla; Nancy E Davidson; Andrew M Stern; David Chu; Ben Ho Park; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genome engineering for estrogen receptor mutations reveals differential responses to anti-estrogens and new prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer.

Authors:  Alison Harrod; Chun-Fui Lai; Isabella Goldsbrough; Georgia M Simmons; Natasha Oppermans; Daniela B Santos; Balazs Győrffy; Rebecca C Allsopp; Bradley J Toghill; Kirsty Balachandran; Mandy Lawson; Christopher J Morrow; Manasa Surakala; Larissa S Carnevalli; Pei Zhang; David S Guttery; Jacqueline A Shaw; R Charles Coombes; Lakjaya Buluwela; Simak Ali
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 8.756

2.  Stereospecific lasofoxifene derivatives reveal the interplay between estrogen receptor alpha stability and antagonistic activity in ESR1 mutant breast cancer cells.

Authors:  David J Hosfield; Sandra Weber; Nan-Sheng Li; Madline Sauvage; Carstyn F Joiner; Govinda R Hancock; Emily A Sullivan; Estelle Ndukwe; Ross Han; Sydney Cush; Muriel Lainé; Sylvie C Mader; Geoffrey L Greene; Sean W Fanning
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Profiling of Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Argun Akcakanat; Xiaofeng Zheng; Christian X Cruz Pico; Tae-Beom Kim; Ken Chen; Anil Korkut; Aysegul Sahin; Vijaykumar Holla; Emily Tarco; Gopal Singh; Senthil Damodaran; Gordon B Mills; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Next-Generation Endocrine Therapies for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Donald P McDonnell; Suzanne E Wardell; Ching-Yi Chang; John D Norris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Lasofoxifene as a potential treatment for therapy-resistant ER-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Muriel Lainé; Sean W Fanning; Ya-Fang Chang; Bradley Green; Marianne E Greene; Barry Komm; Justyna D Kurleto; Linda Phung; Geoffrey L Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  RON signalling promotes therapeutic resistance in ESR1 mutant breast cancer.

Authors:  Derek Dustin; Guowei Gu; Amanda R Beyer; Sarah K Herzog; David G Edwards; Hangqing Lin; Thomas L Gonzalez; Sandra L Grimm; Cristian Coarfa; Doug W Chan; Beom-Jun Kim; Jean-Paul De La O; Matthew J Ellis; Dan Liu; Shunqiang Li; Alana L Welm; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  From Pure Antagonists to Pure Degraders of the Estrogen Receptor: Evolving Strategies for the Same Target.

Authors:  Madhusoodanan Mottamal; Borui Kang; Xianyou Peng; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-03-30

Review 8.  ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jamie O Brett; Laura M Spring; Aditya Bardia; Seth A Wander
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Genomic profiling using the UltraSEEK panel identifies discordancy between paired primary and breast cancer brain metastases and an association with brain metastasis-free survival.

Authors:  Athina Giannoudis; Alexander Sartori; Lee Eastoe; Rasheed Zakaria; Christopher Charlton; Nicholas Hickson; Angela Platt-Higgins; Philip S Rudland; Darryl Irwin; Michael D Jenkinson; Carlo Palmieri
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Next-generation selective estrogen receptor degraders and other novel endocrine therapies for management of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: current and emerging role.

Authors:  Maxwell R Lloyd; Seth A Wander; Erika Hamilton; Pedram Razavi; Aditya Bardia
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 5.485

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.