M Zizzo1, R Bollino2, V Annessi3. 1. Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. Electronic address: zizzomaurizio@gmail.com. 2. General and Emergency Surgery Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy. 3. Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Dear Editor,we read with great interest “Strategy for the practice of digestive and oncological surgery during the Covid-19 epidemic” by Tuech et al. [1]. Authors introduced a very comprehensive analysis on elective surgery for digestive cancer during COVID-19 pandemic [1]. In particular, they highlighted both broad and specific strategies (esophagogastric, hepato-bilio-pancreatic and colorectal surgery) for intraoperative and postoperative care of “surgical environment” [1].At present, advice summarized in above manuscript can be considered as excellent trustworthy guidelines in digestive cancer surgery [1]. Furthermore, additional precautions suggested by Canis et al. seem timely and appropriate [2].However, both groups of authors do not mention how to screen patients who cannot be deferred for elective surgery immediately prior to hospitalization and at hospital discharge, in order to identify positive asymptomatic patients and patients not yet symptomatic (pre-symptomatic), thus minimizing the risk of infection spread [3], [4]. As asymptomatic COVID-19patients are not routinely tested, both prevalence of asymptomatic infection and detection of pre-symptomatic infection are unclear [5].In order to prevent COVID-19 transmission, many Surgical Societies recommended postponement of elective surgery until COVID-19 outbreak has abated. Being a surgical approach to be performed within a limited time range, limited-term surgery helps treat severe or rapidly progressing conditions, including advanced cancers. At present, no guidelines or recommendations for patients receiving limited-term surgery ruling out COVID-19infection or precautions for preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection exist.Nasopharyngeal (NP) and/or oropharyngeal (OP) swabs are often recommended in the screening or early diagnosis of infection [3]. A single NP swab has turned out as best approach, being well tolerated by the patient and safer for healthcare operator. Current information on CDC sensitivity test are scarce, but supposedly they range from 66%–80%, with a 20–33% chance for false negatives. The reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing cycle threshold highlights large quantities of RNA viral in asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and symptomatic residents, suggesting a potential for transmission regardless of symptoms [4].Although less sensitive than chest computed tomography (CT) scan, chest x-rays represent the first-line imaging method to detect patients with suspected COVID-19 [6]. In order to ease decontamination, mobile x-ray units are strongly recommended. In the early or mild stages of COVID-19 disease, chest x-rays may be negative [6]. Among COVID-19patients requiring hospitalization, 69% showed an abnormal chest x-ray at the initial time of admission and 80% showed radiographic abnormalities in the course of hospitalization [6]. X-ray findings are most extensive 10–12 days from symptom onset [6]. Most patients had a negative CT in the two days following symptom onset with ground-glass opacities developing between day 0 and day 4 following symptom onset and peaking between 6–13 days [7]. Therefore, negative CT should not be used to rule out COVID-19, particularly in the early stage of disease [7]. Reported CT sensitivities and specificities for COVID-19 vary widely: they range from 60% to 98% and from 25% to 53% respectively [7].Lastly, a RT-PCR positive stool test turns out in 36%–53% patients with confirmed COVID-19infection [8]. If compared to respiratory samples, stool test turns out positive 2–5 days later [8]. Moreover, in 23%–82% patients it remains positive after negativity of respiratory samples, during a mean of up 11 ± 9 days [8].A team of experts was appointed by Reggio Emilia Local Health Authority (LHA) (Emilia-Romagna, Italy) to draw up a COVID-19 screening pathway for patients who must undergo non-deferrable elective surgery. It aims at maximizing identification of asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic positive patients at pre-hospitalization and that of patients who become positive in the course of hospitalization.Based on the above diagnostic information, we hereby suggest to carry out following investigations:5 days before admission: accurate family and personal history for SARS-Cov-2 infection (e.g. symptoms and signs, contacts with positive persons in the previous 14 days) and physical examination;2 days before admission: RT-PCR test, chest x-ray and laboratory tests (complete blood count, C-reactive protein, serum procalcitonin, hepato-bilio-pancreatic and renal function parameters, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, hemostasis parameters, serum ferritin);12–14 days after discharge: RT-PCR test and fecal test.Discharge tests are intended for standard hospitalization lasting less than 10 days. In case of longer hospitalizations, due to subsequent medical or surgical complications or other reasons, tests would be performed during hospitalization at the discretion or availability by the Surgery Unit or LHA.Different virus incubation times in addition to scarcity of scientific evidence make our protocol wide open to amendments.
Sources of funding
The authors have no financial ties to disclose.
Disclosure of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Authors: Scott Simpson; Fernando U Kay; Suhny Abbara; Sanjeev Bhalla; Jonathan H Chung; Michael Chung; Travis S Henry; Jeffrey P Kanne; Seth Kligerman; Jane P Ko; Harold Litt Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Ho Yuen Frank Wong; Hiu Yin Sonia Lam; Ambrose Ho-Tung Fong; Siu Ting Leung; Thomas Wing-Yan Chin; Christine Shing Yen Lo; Macy Mei-Sze Lui; Jonan Chun Yin Lee; Keith Wan-Hang Chiu; Tom Wai-Hin Chung; Elaine Yuen Phin Lee; Eric Yuk Fai Wan; Ivan Fan Ngai Hung; Tina Poy Wing Lam; Michael D Kuo; Ming-Yen Ng Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J-J Tuech; A Gangloff; F Di Fiore; P Michel; C Brigand; K Slim; M Pocard; L Schwarz Journal: J Visc Surg Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 2.043
Authors: Ki Ho Hong; Sang Won Lee; Taek Soo Kim; Hee Jae Huh; Jaehyeon Lee; So Yeon Kim; Jae Sun Park; Gab Jeong Kim; Heungsup Sung; Kyoung Ho Roh; Jae Seok Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Seung Tae Lee; Moon Woo Seong; Namhee Ryoo; Hyukmin Lee; Kye Chul Kwon; Cheon Kwon Yoo Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Anne Kimball; Kelly M Hatfield; Melissa Arons; Allison James; Joanne Taylor; Kevin Spicer; Ana C Bardossy; Lisa P Oakley; Sukarma Tanwar; Zeshan Chisty; Jeneita M Bell; Mark Methner; Josh Harney; Jesica R Jacobs; Christina M Carlson; Heather P McLaughlin; Nimalie Stone; Shauna Clark; Claire Brostrom-Smith; Libby C Page; Meagan Kay; James Lewis; Denny Russell; Brian Hiatt; Jessica Gant; Jeffrey S Duchin; Thomas A Clark; Margaret A Honein; Sujan C Reddy; John A Jernigan Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Nurcihan Aygun; Yalin Iscan; Murat Ozdemir; Selen Soylu; Oguz Ugur Aydin; Ismail Cem Sormaz; Ahmet Cem Dural; Nuri Alper Sahbaz; Serkan Teksoz; Ozer Makay; Ali Ugur Emre; Mehmet Haciyanli; Recep Gokhan Icoz; Yasemin Giles; Adnan Isgor; Mehmet Uludag; Fatih Tunca Journal: Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul Date: 2020-06-16
Authors: Cooper Barber; Andrew Syski; Jennifer Leaird; R Christopher Call; Ann Williams; Peter Learn Journal: Mil Med Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 1.563