| Literature DB >> 32380746 |
Cristina Santurino1, Bricia López-Plaza1, Javier Fontecha2, María V Calvo2, Laura M Bermejo1, David Gómez-Andrés3,4, Carmen Gómez-Candela1,5.
Abstract
This study examines the value of a goat cheese naturally enriched in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (n-3 PUFA and conjugated linolenic acid (CLA)) as means of improving cardiovascular and inflammatory health. Sixty-eight overweight and obese subjects (BMI ≥ 27 and <40 kg/m2), with at least two risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a lipid panel blood tests, participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel designed study. The subjects consumed for 12 weeks: (1) 60 g/d control goat cheese and (2) 60 g/d goat cheese naturally enriched in n-3 PUFA and CLA. Diet and physical activity were assessed. Anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) tests were performed. Blood samples were collected at the beginning and at the end of the study period. Changes in health status, lifestyle and dietary habits, and daily compliance were recorded. The consumption of a PUFA-enriched goat cheese significantly increased plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, as well as in apolipoprotein B, and it significantly decreased high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations compared to the control goat cheese (p < 0.05). The significant improvement of the plasma lipid profile and inflammatory status of people with risk for CVD due to the consumption of PUFA-enriched cheese suggests a potential role of this dairy product as an alternative to develop high nutritional value food in a balanced diet comprising regular exercise.Entities:
Keywords: CLA; blood lipids; cheese; dairy fat; n-3 PUFA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32380746 PMCID: PMC7285099 DOI: 10.3390/nu12051315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow chart describing the present trial.
Baseline characteristics and anthropometric parameters of the study participants before and after the intervention.
| Characteristic | Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 12–Week 0 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | EG | CG | EG | CG | EG | ||
| Age (years) | 47.60 ± 9.40 | 48.50 ± 7.80 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Men (n) | 8 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Women (n) | 23 | 22 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Weight (kg) | 85.6 ± 11.30 | 86.80 ± 15.80 | 82.18 ± 11.77 | 83.13 ± 15.75 | −3.41 ± 3.13 | −3.66 ± 2.46 | 0.865 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.05 ± 3.30 | 30.74 ± 4.20 | 30.47 ± 3.69 | 30.54 ± 4.09 | −1.12 ± 0.20 | −0.93 ± 0.17 | 0.756 |
| Waist circ. (cm) | 105.0 ± 10.50 | 99.55 ± 10.60 | 96.29 ± 12.79 | 97.03 ± 11.09 | −5.74 ± 6.63 | −5.87 ± 3.18 | 0.889 |
| BMD (g/cm2) | 1.17 ± 0.12 | 1.16 ± 0.13 | 1.17 ± 0.12 | 1.16 ± 0.14 | −0.004 ± 0.01 | −0.002 ± 0.14 | 0.767 |
| Lean mass (%) | 45.23 ± 7.77 | 46.15 ± 9.72 | 44.75 ± 8.00 | 45.72 ± 9.84 | −0.49 ± 1.24 | −0.43 ± 1.21 | 0.723 |
| Android fat (%) | 51.62 ± 7.19 | 50.72 ± 7.14 | 48.83 ± 9.29 | 48.92 ± 7.82 | −2.80 ± 2.99 | −1.80 ± 2.44 | 0.436 |
| Gynoid fat (%) | 47.24 ± 7.53 | 47.22 ± 8.24 | 45.64 ± 8.22 | 45.20 ± 8.14 | −1.60 ± 1.99 | −2.02 ± 1.90 | 0.356 |
| Total fat mass (%) | 46.94 ± 5.87 | 46.27 ± 6.29 | 44.55 ± 6.87 | 43.11 ± 6.67 | −1.79 ± 1.80 | −1.72 ± 1.68 | 0.645 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 110.3 ± 14.00 | 110.9 ± 13.10 | 110.7 ± 10.09 | 105.64 ± 22.05 | 0.45 ± 9.41 | −5.21 ± 21.35 | 0.123 |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 77.50 ± 10.70 | 76.50 ± 9.50 | 76.90 ± 8.53 | 75.07 ± 8.38 | −0.61 ± 7.99 | −1.46 ± 7.79 | 0.385 |
| HR (rate per minute) | 75.30 ± 10.50 | 77.70 ± 10.50 | 68.10 ± 11.97 | 75.71 ± 13.70 | −7.23 ± 9.39 | −1.96 ± 10.97 | 0.259 |
Data are expressed as the means ± SDs. Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; Waist circ.: waist circumference; BMD: bone mineral density; BP: blood pressure; and HR: heart rate.
Blood lipids and apolipoproteins concentrations before and after intervention.
| (mg/dL) | CG | EG | Week 12–Week 0 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 0 | Week 12 | CG | EG | CI 95% | ||||
|
| 201.80 ± 40.41 | 197.16 ± 36.95 | 195.39 ± 37.38 | 201.46 ± 38.81 | −2 (−90; 43) | 6.5 (−24; 50) | 10.72 (0.37; 22.74) | # | ||
|
| 54.97 ± 16.47 | * | 53.97 ± 11.08 | 47.89 ± 8.00 | * | 52.00 ± 9.24 | 2 (−48; 12) | 4.5 (−5; 16) | 5.11 (1.96; 11.46) | # |
|
| 128.97 ± 31.34 | 125.61 ± 29.29 | 127.32 ± 32.45 | 129.71 ± 31.59 | 3 (−11; 16) | 2.5 (−9; 31) | 1.39 (−2.15; 5.92) | |||
|
| 89.00 ± 42.24 | 87.81 ± 47.65 | 100.71 ± 34.33 | 99.50 ± 31.59 | 6 (−65; 75) | 1 (−56; 53) | −0.02 (−12.8; 14.62) | |||
|
| 161.32 ± 26.62 | 153.94 ± 20.85 | 150.68 ± 16.30 | 152.14 ± 18.40 | −1 (−28; 9.6) | 0.3 (−9.8; 24) | 2.74 (−0.3; 6.98) | |||
|
| 102.42 ± 21.45 | 101.65 ± 22.06 | 102.86 ± 23.33 | 108.00 ± 26.20 | −2* (−19; 27) | 3.5* (−20; 34) | 5.92 (0.81; 11.77) | |||
|
| 93.06 ± 8.08 | 95.39 ± 8.49 | 90.82 ± 9.40 | 94.54 ± 7.54 | 2.32 (70.04; 94.06) | 3.71 (67.05; 95.04) | 0.05 (–0.1; 0.19) | |||
Data are expressed as the means ± SDs. Statistical analysis was assessed by Mann–Whitney U test. * Significant difference between groups at week 0 p < 0.05. # Significant difference between groups at the end of the intervention period (week 0–week 12) p < 0.05. Abbreviations: TC: total cholesterol; HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and TAG triglycerides.
Values of total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (TC/HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/HDL and apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (ApoB/ApoA1) ratios before and after the intervention.
| Ratio | CG ( | EG ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 0 | Week 12 | |
|
| 3.67 ± 2.5 | 3.67 ± 3.3 | 4.06 ± 4.6 | 3.87 ± 4.6 |
|
| 1.71 ± 1.9 | 1.72 ± 2.6 | 1.91 ± 4.0 | 1.79 ± 3.4 * |
|
| 0.63 ± 0.8 | 0.66 ± 1.1 | 0.68 ± 1.43 | 0.71 ± 1.42 |
Data are presented as mean ± s.d. * Significant difference between groups before and after the intervention p < 0.05. Abbreviations: TC: total cholesterol; HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and TAG: triglycerides.
Inflammatory biomarker concentration before and after the intervention.
| CG | EG | Week 12–Week 0 | CI 95% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 0 | Week 12 | CG | EG | ||
|
| 2.67 ± 4.36 | 2.98 ± 7.62 | 2.95 ± 6.06 | 1.02 ± 6.33 | 0.03 (−18.12; 32.1) | −0.76 (−12.34; 3.38) | –10.72 (0.37; 22.74) # |
|
| 3.88 ± 1.45 | 4.47 ± 1.43 | 4.51 ± 1.57 | 4.85 ± 1.71 | 0.5 (−0.8; 18.3) | 0.75 (−1.2; 2.5) | −0.46 (−246; 0.28) |
|
| 2.60 ± 2.37 | 3.70 ± 2.25 | 2.70 ± 1.53 | 3.65 ± 1.60 | 1.2 (−1.7; 3.2) | 0.95 (−2; 5.2) | −0.12 (−0.82; 0.6) |
|
| 397 ± 102.82 | 413 ± 97.33 | 419 ± 124.14 | 346 ± 129.64 | −13 (−333;425) | −17 (−202; 106) | −26.88 (−81.27; 22.96) |
|
| 72.71 ± 238.10 | 80.53 ± 245.14 | 135.09 ± 229.32 | 113.47 ± 218.01 | 0.01 (−164.2; 654.9) | −0.31 (−250.9; 90.4) | −13.3 (−87.2; 16.9) |
|
| 0.28 ± 0.17 | 0.25 ± 0.08 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.23 ± 0.10 | −0.01 (−0.47; 0.21) | −0.06 (−0.41; 0.2) | −0.03 (−0.09; 0.04) |
Data are expressed as the means ± SDs. Statistical analysis was assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. Significant difference between groups at week 0 p < 0.05. # Significant difference between groups at the end of the intervention period (week 0–week 12) p < 0.05. Abbreviations: CRP: high-sensitivity C reactive protein; TNF-α: tumor necrosis alpha factor; IL-6: interleukin 6; oxLDL: oxidized LDL; and FFA: free fatty acids.
Mineral and hormone concentrations before and after the intervention.
| CG | EG | Week12–Week 0 | CI 95% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 12 | Week 0 | Week 12 | CG | EG | ||
|
| 14.26 ± 6.15 | 21.89 ± 6.94 | 13.95 ± 6.06 | 22.5 ± 6.33 | 7 (1; 23) | 8 (0; 17) | 0.39 (−2.2; 2.26) |
|
| 9.16 ± 0.38 | 9.24 ± 0.30 | 9.16 ± 0.32 | 9.30 ± 0.35 | 0.1 (−0.6; 0.7) | 0.15 (−0.3; 0.9) | 0.05 (−0.1; 0.19) |
|
| 3.35 ± 0.39 | 3.41 ± 0.52 | 3.46 ± 0.59 | 3.32 ± 0.47 | 0.1 (−0.8; 0.8) | −0.1 (−1.4; 0.8) | −0.19 (−0.41; 0.02) |
|
| 9.9 ± 13.75 | 10 ± 14.42 | 8.45 ± 19.62 | 8.10 ± 20.69 | 0.6 (−35.7; 40.3) | 0.05 (−41.8; 39.2) | −0.37 (−7.72; 6.78) |
|
| 14.14 ± 10.74 | 11.01 ± 10.00 | 14.80 ± 10.80 | 11.15 ± 10.50 | −1.8 (−23.03; 13.1) | −2.7 (−9.5; 2.5) | −0.12 (−0.82; 0.6) |
Data are presented as mean ± SDs.