Literature DB >> 32378957

Does my professor think my ability can change? Students' perceptions of their STEM professors' mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class.

Katherine Muenks1, Elizabeth A Canning2, Jennifer LaCosse3, Dorainne J Green3, Sabrina Zirkel4, Julie A Garcia5, Mary C Murphy3.   

Abstract

Two experiments and 2 field studies examine how college students' perceptions of their science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professors' mindset beliefs about the fixedness or malleability of intelligence predict students' anticipated and actual psychological experiences and performance in their STEM classes, as well as their engagement and interest in STEM more broadly. In Studies 1 (N = 252) and 2 (N = 224), faculty mindset beliefs were experimentally manipulated and students were exposed to STEM professors who endorsed either fixed or growth mindset beliefs. In Studies 3 (N = 291) and 4 (N = 902), we examined students' perceptions of their actual STEM professors' mindset beliefs and used experience sampling methodology (ESM) to capture their in-the-moment psychological experiences in those professors' classes. Across all studies, we find that students who perceive that their professor endorses more fixed mindset beliefs anticipate (Studies 1 and 2) and actually experience (Studies 3 and 4) more psychological vulnerability in those professors' classes-specifically, they report less belonging in class, greater evaluative concerns, greater imposter feelings, and greater negative affect. We also find that in-the-moment experiences of psychological vulnerability have downstream consequences. Students who perceive that their STEM professors endorse more fixed mindset beliefs experience greater psychological vulnerability in those professors' classes, which in turn predict greater dropout intentions, lower class attendance, less class engagement, less end-of-semester interest in STEM, and lower grades. These findings contribute to our understanding of how students' perceptions of professors' mindsets can serve as a situational cue that affects students' motivation, engagement, and performance in STEM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32378957     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  5 in total

1.  What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?

Authors:  David S Yeager; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020-12

2.  Stereotype Threat in High School Classrooms: How It Links to Teacher Mindset Climate, Mathematics Anxiety, and Achievement.

Authors:  Eunjin Seo; You-Kyung Lee
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2021-04-28

3.  Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn't Work.

Authors:  David S Yeager; Jamie M Carroll; Jenny Buontempo; Andrei Cimpian; Spencer Woody; Robert Crosnoe; Chandra Muller; Jared Murray; Pratik Mhatre; Nicole Kersting; Christopher Hulleman; Molly Kudym; Mary Murphy; Angela Lee Duckworth; Gregory M Walton; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Beliefs, affordances, and adolescent development: Lessons from a decade of growth mindset interventions.

Authors:  Cameron A Hecht; David S Yeager; Carol S Dweck; Mary C Murphy
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  Exploring the Nature of Teachers' Math-Gender Stereotypes: The Math-Gender Misconception Questionnaire.

Authors:  Anna-Sophia Dersch; Anke Heyder; Alexander Eitel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.