Simone Krebs1, Joseph A O'Donoghue2, Evan Biegel2, Bradley J Beattie2, Diane Reidy3, Serge K Lyashchenko4,5,6, Jason S Lewis4,5,6, Lisa Bodei4,6, Wolfgang A Weber4,6,7, Neeta Pandit-Taskar4,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. krebss@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 5. Radiochemistry and Molecular Imaging Probes Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Paired imaging/therapy with radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonists is a novel approach in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The aim of this study was to compare tumor uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 and 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (177Lu-DOTA-JR11) in patients with NETs. METHODS: As part of a prospective clinical trial, 20 patients with metastatic NETs underwent 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT and serial imaging with 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. PET/CT and SPECT/CT parameters for lesion uptake and absorbed dose of 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in lesions were compared using linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: A total of 95 lesions were analyzed on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT and 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan SPECT/CT. SUVs and tumor-to-normal-tissue ratios on PET/CT and SPECT/CT were significantly correlated (p < 0.01), but the degree of correlation was modest with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.3 to 0.7. Variation in intrapatient lesional correlation was observed. Nevertheless, in all patients, the lesion SUVpeak uptake ratio for 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan vs. 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 was high; even in those with low uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT (SUVpeak ≤ 10), a ratio of 8.0 ± 5.2 was noted. Correlation of SUVpeak of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 with projected 177Lu-satoreotide tetratexan-absorbed dose (n = 42) was modest (r = 0.5, p < 0.01), while excellent correlation of SUVpeak of 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan with projected 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan-absorbed dose was noted (r = 0.9, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET can be used for patient selection and PRRT and that low tumor uptake on PET should not preclude patients from treatment with 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. The ability to use single time-point SPECT/CT for absorbed dose calculations could facilitate dosimetry regimens, save costs, and improve patient convenience.
PURPOSE: Paired imaging/therapy with radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonists is a novel approach in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The aim of this study was to compare tumor uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 and 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (177Lu-DOTA-JR11) in patients with NETs. METHODS: As part of a prospective clinical trial, 20 patients with metastatic NETs underwent 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT and serial imaging with 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. PET/CT and SPECT/CT parameters for lesion uptake and absorbed dose of 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in lesions were compared using linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: A total of 95 lesions were analyzed on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT and 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan SPECT/CT. SUVs and tumor-to-normal-tissue ratios on PET/CT and SPECT/CT were significantly correlated (p < 0.01), but the degree of correlation was modest with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.3 to 0.7. Variation in intrapatient lesional correlation was observed. Nevertheless, in all patients, the lesion SUVpeak uptake ratio for 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan vs. 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 was high; even in those with low uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT (SUVpeak ≤ 10), a ratio of 8.0 ± 5.2 was noted. Correlation of SUVpeak of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 with projected 177Lu-satoreotide tetratexan-absorbed dose (n = 42) was modest (r = 0.5, p < 0.01), while excellent correlation of SUVpeak of 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan with projected 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan-absorbed dose was noted (r = 0.9, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET can be used for patient selection and PRRT and that low tumor uptake on PET should not preclude patients from treatment with 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. The ability to use single time-point SPECT/CT for absorbed dose calculations could facilitate dosimetry regimens, save costs, and improve patient convenience.
Authors: Martin Barrio; Johannes Czernin; Stefano Fanti; Valentina Ambrosini; Ina Binse; Lin Du; Matthias Eiber; Ken Herrmann; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ebrahim S Delpassand; Amin Samarghandi; Sara Zamanian; Edward M Wolin; Mohammadali Hamiditabar; Gregory D Espenan; Jack L Erion; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Larry K Kvols; Jaime Simon; Robert Wolfangel; Arthur Camp; Eric P Krenning; Alireza Mojtahedi Journal: Pancreas Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: François Jamar; Raffaella Barone; Isabelle Mathieu; Stéphan Walrand; Daniel Labar; Pascal Carlier; Joëlle de Camps; Horst Schran; TianLing Chen; M Charles Smith; Hakim Bouterfa; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning; Larry K Kvols; Stanislas Pauwels Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-02-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Lisa Bodei; Marta Cremonesi; Chiara M Grana; Nicola Fazio; Simona Iodice; Silvia M Baio; Mirco Bartolomei; Dario Lombardo; Mahila E Ferrari; Maddalena Sansovini; Marco Chinol; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-09-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Damian Wild; Melpomeni Fani; Richard Fischer; Luigi Del Pozzo; Felix Kaul; Simone Krebs; Richard Fischer; Jean E F Rivier; Jean Claude Reubi; Helmut R Maecke; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Lisa Bodei; Marta Cremonesi; Stefania Zoboli; Chiara Grana; Mirco Bartolomei; Paola Rocca; Maurizio Caracciolo; Helmut R Mäcke; Marco Chinol; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-11-16 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Simone Krebs; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Diane Reidy; Bradley J Beattie; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Lisa Bodei; Wolfgang A Weber; Joseph A O'Donoghue Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ka Kit Wong; Kirk A Frey; Jeremy Niedbala; Ravi K Kaza; Francis P Worden; Kellen J Fitzpatrick; Yuni K Dewaraja Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 1.698