| Literature DB >> 32375874 |
Riaan F Rifkin1,2, Surendra Vikram3, Jean-Baptiste Ramond3,4,5, Alba Rey-Iglesia6, Tina B Brand6, Guillaume Porraz7,8, Aurore Val8,9, Grant Hall10, Stephan Woodborne10,11, Matthieu Le Bailly12, Marnie Potgieter3, Simon J Underdown3,4, Jessica E Koopman3, Don A Cowan3, Yves Van de Peer3,13,14, Eske Willerslev6,15,16, Anders J Hansen17.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The archaeological incidence of ancient human faecal material provides a rare opportunity to explore the taxonomic composition and metabolic capacity of the ancestral human intestinal microbiome (IM). Here, we report the results of the shotgun metagenomic analyses of an ancient South African palaeo-faecal specimen.Entities:
Keywords: Ancient DNA; Human evolution; Intestinal microbiome; Metabolic capacity; Molecular ecology; Taxonomic composition
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375874 PMCID: PMC7204047 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00832-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Provenience of sub-sampling protocol applied to and microbial taxa detected in the BRS palaeo-faecal specimen. a The location of Bushman Rock Shelter (BRS) in Limpopo Province, South Africa. b Lateral (left) and cross-sectional (right) views of the specimen indicating the sub-sampling protocol applied to facilitate DNA extraction, including ‘sedimentary control’ sample 1 (‘SC1’); faecal samples 2, 3 and 4 and sedimentary control sample 5 (SC2); 14C AMS dating (14C); isotope analyses (Iso); intestinal parasitic analyses (Ipa); scanning electron microscopy (Sem); and the preservation of a voucher sample (indicated in green shading). c Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) plot comparing the taxonomic community structure (by weighted Bray-Curtis dissimilarity analysis) of the BRS specimen (i.e. BRS2, BRS3 and BRS4) and the sediment controls (SC1 and SC2) with the ancient (Ötzi) (indicated as SI ‘small intestine’, LPLI ‘lower part of the lower intestine’ and UPLI ‘upper part of the lower intestine’), traditional (Hadza and Malawian) and modern (Italian) IM datasets (taxa were filtered for the occurrence of > 3 in at least 20% of the samples resulting in the inclusion of 371 taxa) (R = 0.6110 indicates ANOSIM analysis which revealed significant differences (p = < 0.001) between the ancient and modern IM samples). d Box-and-whisker plot indicating the relative abundance of intestinal bacterial phyla detected in the BRS specimen (i.e. BRS2, BRS3 and BRS4) (‘other’ comprises phyla with < 0.6% relative abundance). e Bar chart providing an overview of all environmental, commensal and pathogenic genera identified in the BRS specimen (BRS2, BRS3 and BRS4) and information concerning the DNA extraction and library preparation negative controls (E-LPCs) and modern and ancient sedimentary controls (SC1 and SC2) (data derived from Tables 1 and 2 and Table S1) (see the ‘Methods’ section)
DNA sequence reads for twenty-four authenticated commensal IM taxa detected in the BRS palaeo-faecal specimen. Statistically significant (i.e. verified ancient) C-T p values are indicated in bold. BWA mapping was performed using high-quality filtered reads for DNA damage estimation analyses using PMDtools (‘C-T p- values’) (see the ‘Methods’ section). Additional read-length information for individual taxa is provided in Table S5
| Phylum | Genus | BWA aligned (mapped) sequence reads | Mean read length (bp) | C-T | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRS1 | BRS2 | BRS3 | BRS4 | BRS5 | BRS IM total | BRS IM % | BRS1 | BRS2 | BRS3 | BRS4 | BRS5 | ||||||
| Euryarchaeota | 19 | 7 | 1952 | 1109 | 29147 | 69 | 32208 | 4.68 | 70.60 | − | 0.193028900 | 0.073998830 | 0.567650800 | ||||
| Actinobacteria | 0 | 65 | 3445 | 1626 | 54666 | 143 | 59737 | 8.68 | 66.60 | 0.921500700 | 0.153993200 | 0.509736300 | |||||
| 0 | 5 | 89 | 29 | 1343 | 8 | 1461 | 0.21 | 61.80 | 0.935197800 | 0.311623400 | 0.508960500 | − | |||||
| Bacteroidetes | 2 | 4 | 139 | 46 | 1069 | 15 | 1254 | 0.18 | 65.40 | 0.675706100 | 0.420822200 | 0.053055550 | 0.606658100 | ||||
| 5 | 114 | 28316 | 10115 | 115446 | 162 | 153877 | 22.36 | 72.20 | 0.721165000 | 0.142918300 | |||||||
| 32 | 58 | 6986 | 3125 | 33452 | 72 | 43563 | 6.33 | 64.40 | 0.216522900 | 0.921151200 | |||||||
| 1 | 23 | 1656 | 715 | 9663 | 19 | 12034 | 1.75 | 62.80 | 0.500000000 | 0.075530930 | 0.062391830 | 0.161709000 | |||||
| 17 | 48 | 418 | 184 | 3712 | 43 | 4314 | 0.63 | 61.00 | 0.099233850 | 0.305674400 | 0.081571890 | 0.631959800 | |||||
| Firmicutes | 15 | 72 | 276 | 124 | 3640 | 111 | 4040 | 0.59 | 68.20 | 0.608740100 | 0.084446270 | 0.428864300 | 0.245663300 | ||||
| 0 | 8 | 325 | 127 | 3082 | 6 | 3534 | 0.51 | 58.20 | 0.395839900 | 0.109365700 | 0.273060200 | 0.580047400 | |||||
| 4 | 148 | 2671 | 1304 | 29948 | 135 | 33923 | 4.93 | 65.80 | 0.074740200 | 0.296300200 | 0.190844300 | 0.360285900 | |||||
| 1 | 156 | 553 | 298 | 7427 | 20 | 8278 | 1.20 | 74.60 | 0.333696100 | 0.274913800 | − | ||||||
| 0 | 40 | 697 | 296 | 9029 | 51 | 10022 | 1.46 | 65.80 | 0.106194500 | 0.056443760 | 0.246347100 | ||||||
| 0 | 143 | 0 | 259 | 6728 | 14 | 6987 | 1.02 | 69.00 | 0.157217100 | − | 0.903384000 | − | |||||
| 12 | 118 | 595 | 361 | 6219 | 14 | 7175 | 1.04 | 69.60 | 0.463765800 | − | |||||||
| 0 | 7 | 176 | 76 | 2116 | 5 | 2368 | 0.34 | 68.60 | 0.499997800 | 0.228221200 | 0.188080100 | ||||||
| 1 | 12 | 170 | 72 | 2018 | 2 | 2260 | 0.33 | 64.60 | 0.167621400 | 0.349725600 | − | ||||||
| 0 | 7 | 165 | 91 | 1787 | 12 | 2043 | 0.30 | 63.00 | 0.120518600 | 0.349725600 | 0.095004240 | 0.072742730 | |||||
| 18 | 42 | 1119 | 464 | 9229 | 100 | 10812 | 1.57 | 67.40 | 0.271433200 | 0.738132500 | 0.300862800 | ||||||
| 0 | 3 | 508 | 202 | 327 | 2 | 1037 | 0.15 | 67.00 | − | 0.413740500 | − | ||||||
| Proteobacteria | 0 | 145 | 41220 | 14798 | 181051 | 205 | 237069 | 34.45 | 71.80 | 0.132896300 | |||||||
| 14 | 21 | 3485 | 1217 | 15633 | 72 | 20335 | 2.96 | 70.00 | 0.529037900 | 0.921151200 | |||||||
| 0 | 36 | 1023 | 458 | 8330 | 84 | 9811 | 1.43 | 65.80 | 0.126796900 | 0.132801100 | 0.602973600 | ||||||
| 0 | 112 | 2099 | 878 | 16970 | 315 | 19947 | 2.90 | 69.60 | 0.259295700 | 0.171048100 | |||||||
DNA sequence reads for twelve authenticated pathogenic taxa detected in the BRS palaeo-faecal specimen
| Phylum | Genus | Pathogenic clinical manifestations | BWA aligned (mapped) sequence reads | Mean read length (bp) | C-T | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRS1 | BRS2 | BRS3 | BRS4 | BRS5 | Total | BRS1 | BRS2 | BRS3 | BRS4 | BRS5 | |||||
| Actinobacteria | Tuberculosis, leprosy, atypical infections | 701 | 397 | 4535 | 1853 | 59096 | 487 | 67069 | 67.20 | 0.0707802 | 0.2953064 | ||||
| Bacteroidetes | Pneumonia, sepsis, peritonitis, urinary tract infections | 1 | 0 | 461 | 175 | 2552 | 0 | 3189 | 45.40 | − | 0.1960360 | − | |||
| Firmicutes | Listeriosis (convulsions, septicaemia and meningitis) | 0 | 92 | 453 | 233 | 5989 | 5 | 6772 | 72.80 | 0.3494000 | 0.0975000 | 0.8800000 | − | ||
| Proteobacteria | Gastroenteritis and wound infections | 0 | 13 | 129 | 289 | 2033 | 29 | 2493 | 67.20 | 0.2264910 | 0.4139431 | 0.4998525 | |||
| Skin, soft tissue and respiratory infections | 21 | 150 | 36089 | 12869 | 160087 | 311 | 209527 | 72.40 | 0.1190260 | ||||||
| Pertussis (whooping cough, respiratory infection) | 18 | 123 | 2027 | 683 | 16466 | 196 | 19513 | 69.60 | 0.1325985 | 0.2557714 | |||||
| Pulmonary infections (pneumonia, melioidosis) | 12 | 48 | 869 | 287 | 6965 | 156 | 8337 | 62.00 | 0.2711432 | 0.2140947 | 0.3505477 | 0.1594083 | |||
| Acute appendicitis, urinary tract infection | 8 | 79 | 3656 | 1467 | 40820 | 987 | 47017 | 73.40 | 0.6379285 | 0.6381353 | |||||
| Endocarditis, skin an ocular infections | 226 | 594 | 921 | 348 | 10552 | 692 | 13333 | 74.80 | 0.2733595 | 0.5813131 | 0.0712462 | 0.0567663 | |||
| Opportunistic pathogen, various symptoms | 5 | 37 | 9616 | 3170 | 45813 | 95 | 58736 | 66.20 | 0.2478419 | 0.8210803 | |||||
| Shigellosis (dysentery, seizures, mucosal ulceration) | 2 | 253 | 35046 | 12402 | 137623 | 762 | 186088 | 76.80 | 0.5381291 | 0.2954809 | |||||
| Cholera (gastroenteritis, diarrhoea, septicaemia) | 0 | 7 | 419 | 147 | 2333 | 21 | 2927 | 62.80 | − | 0.4420414 | 0.1131828 | − | |||
Statistically significant (i.e. verified ancient) C-T p values are indicated in bold text. BWA mapping was performed using high-quality filtered reads for DNA damage estimation analyses using PMDtools (‘C-T p values’) (see the ‘Methods’ section). Additional read-length information for individual taxa is provided in Table S5
Fig. 2DNA damage estimation analyses and authentication of environmental and subsistence-related taxa detected in the BRS palaeo-faecal specimen. a Dot plot indicating the occurrence of statistically significant C-T p values calculated for environmental- and subsistence-related taxa detected in BRS 1 (SC1), BRS2, BRS3, BRS4 and BRS5 (SC2) (circle sizes and colours represent mapped read-counts and p value significance) and ancient DNA fragmentation patterns shown within the first 25 bp from read ends for the genera bBacteroides and cShigella and the species dBos taurus and eSorghum bicolor (fragment size distributions for each taxon is indicated in the grey inset and labelled b, c, d and e) (Table S1, Fig. S3)
Fig. 3Functional (metabolic) comparison of the ancient (BRS and Ötzi), ethnographic (Hadza and Malawian) and contemporary (Italian) faecal-derived human IMs based on KO-gene analyses for the twenty-four ancient authenticated IM taxa listed in Table 1 (Table S10). The heat map is based on Spearman’s correlation coefficients comparing differences in metabolic functionality for the BRS IM (i.e. BRS2, BRS3 and BRS4) with the ancient, traditional and contemporary comparative IM datasets
Fig. 4Graphic summary of dietary and environmentally induced differences in the metabolic capacities of the ancient and modern IM datasets analysed in this study. a Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and comparison of the metabolic (functional) capacity of the BRS specimen (i.e. BRS2, BRS3 and BRS4) and the sediment controls (SC1 and SC2) with the ancient (Ötzi) (SI ‘small intestine’, LPLI ‘lower part of the lower intestine’ and UPLI ‘upper part of the lower intestine’), traditional (Hadza and Malawian) and modern (Italian) IM datasets (KEGG categories were filtered for occurrence of > 3 in at least 20% of the samples). b Venn diagram indicating the relative abundance of IM taxa-linked KO genes identified in the ancient, traditional and modern comparative cohorts, calculated as based on the twenty-four authenticated ancient IM taxa indicated in Table 1. c Bubble charts indicating the co-abundance (log10) of eighteen (labelled ‘1’ to ‘18’) metabolic IM capacities for the ancient, traditional and modern IM cohorts (bubble sizes are representative of the relative abundance of KEGG categories (see scale on right) and comprise (1) glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, (2) citrate cycle, (3) fructose/mannose metabolism, (4) galactose metabolism, (5) starch/sucrose metabolism, (6) amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, (7) pyruvate metabolism, (8) glyoxylate/dicarboxylate metabolism, (9) propanoate metabolism, (10) butanoate metabolism, (11) synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies, (12) sphingolipid metabolism, (13) biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, (14) n-glycan biosynthesis, (15) glycosphingolipid biosynthesis (-globo), (16) glycosphingolipid biosynthesis (-ganglio), (17) chloroalkane/chloroalkene degradation and (18) naphthalene degradation) (Table S7). d Dissimilarities in ancient and modern IM metabolic capacities are related to recent (historical) changes in human dietary composition and exposure to toxic environmental pollutants (as indicated by the icons and the blue and red arrow). e Differences in IM metabolic capacities are contrasted in terms of the up- and down-regulation of IM metabolic capacities as an ‘ancient’ vs. ‘modern’ comparative summary (see the ‘Methods’ section)