Literature DB >> 3237310

Effects of aging on the interaction of quinuclidinyl benzilate, N-methylscopolamine, pirenzepine, and gallamine with brain muscarinic receptors.

W Surichamorn1, O N Kim, N H Lee, W S Lai, E E el-Fakahany.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of senescence on the binding characteristics of muscarinic receptors by using [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB) and [3H]N-methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS) as ligands in young (3 months), middle-age (10 months) and old (24 months) male Fischer 344 rats. Muscarinic receptor density was found to decrease significantly with aging in certain brain regions, depending on the ligand employed. Moreover, the relative proportions of M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor subtypes was not significantly altered by aging, except in the aged striatum. Furthermore, the dissociation kinetics of [3H]NMS in the cerebral cortex and their allosteric modulation by gallamine were only slightly influenced by age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3237310     DOI: 10.1007/bf00971637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochem Res        ISSN: 0364-3190            Impact factor:   3.996


  40 in total

1.  The character of the muscarinic receptors in different regions of the rat brain.

Authors:  N J Birdsall; E C Hulme; A Burgen
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-02-13

2.  A practical computer-based approach to the analysis of radioligand binding experiments.

Authors:  G A McPherson
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1983 Aug-Oct

3.  Heterogeneity of binding of muscarinic receptor antagonists in rat brain homogenates.

Authors:  J H Lee; E E el-Fakahany
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Competitive interaction of pirenzepine with rat brain muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  E E el-Fakahany; C L Cioffi; M M Abdellatif; M M Miller
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1986-11-19       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  R Hammer; C P Berrie; N J Birdsall; A S Burgen; E C Hulme
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Agonist and antagonist binding to rat brain muscarinic receptors: influence of aging.

Authors:  D Gurwitz; Y Egozi; Y I Henis; Y Kloog; M Sokolovsky
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.673

7.  Effects of aging and cholinergic deafferentation on putative muscarinic cholinergic receptor subtypes in rat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  A B Norman; S N Blaker; L Thal; I Creese
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-10-08       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Effects of ethanol in vivo and in vitro on stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in rat cortex and cerebellum.

Authors:  R A Gonzales; F T Crews
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Memory and cognitive function in man: does the cholinergic system have a specific role?

Authors:  D A Drachman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Multiple binding affinities of N-methylscopolamine to brain muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: differentiation from M1 and M2 receptor subtypes.

Authors:  E E el-Fakahany; V Ramkumar; W S Lai
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  2 in total

1.  Age-related alterations in pre-synaptic and receptor-mediated cholinergic functions in rat brain.

Authors:  R L Büyükuysal; I H Ulus; B K Kiran
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Age-dependent decrease in the affinity of muscarinic M1 receptors in neocortex of rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M G Vannucchi; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.