Literature DB >> 32372319

Gender-related differences in the performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Rong Shen1, Wei Zhang1, Shaoxiong Ming1, Ling Li1, Yonghan Peng2, Xiaofeng Gao3.   

Abstract

The study aims to identify whether gender differences exist in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to the extent of affecting its predictive accuracy for septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A retrospective study of 612 patients undergoing PCNL was performed. The SOFA scores of male and female groups were compared to identify any gender differences. The ROC curve was used to find differences between the original and adjusted SOFA scores. Postoperative septic shock developed in 21 (3.43%) cases. A marginally significant discrepancy in median SOFA scores between genders was discovered in a subgroup of patients < 40 years old (p = 0.048). A gender difference existed in the SOFA score after PCNL, with greater proportion of high scores in female patients (p = 0.011). Male patients had a higher proportion of ≥ 2 sub-score in hepatic and renal systems than female patients, caused by their higher preoperative bilirubin and creatinine (p < 0.05). An adjusted SOFA score was created to replace the original postoperative SOFA score with the perioperative changed values of bilirubin and creatinine. Performance of the adjusted SOFA score for predicting septic shock was comparable with the original SOFA score (AUC 0.987 vs. 0.985, p = 0.932). Under the premise of ensuring 100% sensitivity, the adjusted SOFA score reduced the 43.7% (31/71) false-positive rate for predicting septic shock compared with the original SOFA score. In conclusion, the gender should not be neglected when applying SOFA score for patients after PCNL. The adjusted SOFA score eliminates negative effects caused by gender differences in predicting septic shock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Septic shock; Sequential organ failure assessment; Urinary calculi

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32372319     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01190-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  32 in total

1.  Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; E Wesley Ely; Dylan M Smith; Kenneth M Langa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Ali Güler; Akif Erbin; Burak Ucpinar; Metin Savun; Omer Sarilar; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Omer Koras; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Tansu Degirmenci; Burak Arslan; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Risk factors for sepsis in patients with struvite stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Xiaomin Gao; Chaoyue Lu; Fei Xie; Ling Li; Min Liu; Ziyu Fang; Zeyu Wang; Shaoxiong Ming; Hao Dong; Rong Shen; Yinghao Sun; Yonghan Peng; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Evaluation of day-care versus inpatient mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a propensity score-matching study.

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Hongling Sun; Xiangkun Wu; Chao Cai; Yongda Liu; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  Sepsis and septic shock-is a microcirculation a main player?

Authors:  Małgorzata Lipinska-Gediga
Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther       Date:  2016-09-23

Review 8.  Severity of illness and organ failure assessment in adult intensive care units.

Authors:  Bekele Afessa; Ognjen Gajic; Mark T Keegan
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Early and rapid prediction of postoperative infections following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with complex kidney stones.

Authors:  Dong Chen; Chonghe Jiang; Xiongfa Liang; Fangling Zhong; Jian Huang; Yongping Lin; Zhijian Zhao; Xiaolu Duan; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of BMPER in Patients with Urosepsis following Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Chang Geng Xu; Yong Lian Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive values of the SOFA score and procalcitonin for septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Haifeng Hou; Jun Yang; Zhenhua Han; Xiaoyang Zhang; Xiaoying Tang; Tianming Chen
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  Predictive accuracy of the modified SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Meng Gao; Zewu Zhu; Minghui Liu; Jinbo Chen; Hequn Chen
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.861

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.