Literature DB >> 31522229

Evaluation of day-care versus inpatient mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a propensity score-matching study.

Zhijian Zhao1, Hongling Sun1, Xiangkun Wu1, Chao Cai1, Yongda Liu2,3, Guohua Zeng4,5.   

Abstract

Day-care percutaneous nephrolithotomy (day-PCNL) is being performed more routinely, however, safety remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rate, readmission rate and medical cost saving between day-PCNL and inpatient-PCNL. A protocol for day-PCNL was applied. A retrospective review of 86 patients planned day-PCNL by one surgeon were conducted. Using propensity matching, 86 inpatients (minimum 2-day post-operative stay) treated with the same procedure were matched. For each cohort, 14-day occurrence of complications and unplanned readmissions were recorded and compared. More than 80% of patients had multiple or staghorn stones in both groups. There were no significant differences between stone-free rate, operative time, multiple-tracts use, hemoglobin drop (each p > 0.05). Day- PCNL has a higher tubeless rate (60.8% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001) and were less costly (mean 2732 vs. 3828 dollars) compared with inpatient PCNL. Within 14 days post-operatively, 10 day-care patients (11.6%) and 13 inpatients (15.1%) experienced complications, with no difference in rate or severity. Four patients (4.6%) required full admission (longer than 24 h) and two patents needed readmission in day-PCNL group. Day-care PCNL was more cost-effective than in-patients PCNL, with no significant difference in complications along with very low unplanned readmission during the postoperative period of 14 days. Therefore, day-care PCNL is a cost-effective choice in selected patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Day-surgery; Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31522229     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01160-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  5 in total

Review 1.  Precision Stone Surgery: Current Status of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  John M DiBianco; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The feasibility of multiple-tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as an overnight surgery for the treatment of complex kidney stones.

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Shanfeng Yin; Huacai Zhu; Donglong Cheng; Yongda Liu; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Gender-related differences in the performance of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Rong Shen; Wei Zhang; Shaoxiong Ming; Ling Li; Yonghan Peng; Xiaofeng Gao
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Emergency department and hospital revisits after ambulatory surgery for kidney stones: an analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

Authors:  Katharine F Michel; Hiten D Patel; Justin B Ziemba
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Impact of Cluster Nursing on Nursing on VAS Score and Urinary Function of Patients after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Lithotripsy (PCNL).

Authors:  Zhengyuan Li; Hong Chen; Shiduo Zhao; Gangtian Yang; Wenfan Yang; Jingping Guo
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 1.781

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.