Qingjun Zeng1, Qingqing Wang2, Lu Zhang1, Xiaocang Xu1,3. 1. School of Economics, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China. 2. Research Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtse River, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China. 3. Department of Actuarial Studies & Business Analytics, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid aging of populations in some countries has led to a growing number of the disabled elderly, creating a huge need for Long-Term Care (LTC) and meeting its costs, which is a heavy economic burden on the families of the disabled elderly and governments. Therefore, the measurement of Long-Term Care (LTC) costs has become an important basis for the government to formulate Long-Term Care (LTC) policies, and academic research on Long-Term Care (LTC) costs is also in the process of continuous development and deepening. METHODS: This is a systematic review that aims to examine the evidence published in the last decade (2010-2019) regarding the comparison of the measurement of Long-Term Care (LTC) costs between China and other countries. RESULTS: Eighteen Chinese studies and 17 other countries' studies were included in this review. Most Chinese scholars estimated long-term care costs based on the degree of disability among the disabled elderly. However, the studies of European and American countries are more and more in-depth and comprehensive, and more detailed regarding the post-care cost of specific diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and epilepsy. CONCLUSION: In future academic research, we should fully consider the human value of long-term care providers and further study the differences in the long-term care costs of different chronic diseases. In China's future policymaking, according to the experience of Germany, Sweden, and other countries, it may be an effective way to develop private long-term care insurance and realize the effective complementarity between private long-term care insurance and public long-term care insurance (LTCI).
BACKGROUND: The rapid aging of populations in some countries has led to a growing number of the disabled elderly, creating a huge need for Long-Term Care (LTC) and meeting its costs, which is a heavy economic burden on the families of the disabled elderly and governments. Therefore, the measurement of Long-Term Care (LTC) costs has become an important basis for the government to formulate Long-Term Care (LTC) policies, and academic research on Long-Term Care (LTC) costs is also in the process of continuous development and deepening. METHODS: This is a systematic review that aims to examine the evidence published in the last decade (2010-2019) regarding the comparison of the measurement of Long-Term Care (LTC) costs between China and other countries. RESULTS: Eighteen Chinese studies and 17 other countries' studies were included in this review. Most Chinese scholars estimated long-term care costs based on the degree of disability among the disabled elderly. However, the studies of European and American countries are more and more in-depth and comprehensive, and more detailed regarding the post-care cost of specific diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and epilepsy. CONCLUSION: In future academic research, we should fully consider the human value of long-term care providers and further study the differences in the long-term care costs of different chronic diseases. In China's future policymaking, according to the experience of Germany, Sweden, and other countries, it may be an effective way to develop private long-term care insurance and realize the effective complementarity between private long-term care insurance and public long-term care insurance (LTCI).
Entities:
Keywords:
Long-Term Care (LTC); disabled elderly; home care; institutional care; long-term care costs
Authors: O Katayama; S Lee; S Bae; K Makino; I Chiba; K Harada; M Morikawa; K Tomida; H Shimada Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2022 Impact factor: 5.285