OBJECTIVE: Global Maxwell Tomography (GMT) is a recently introduced volumetric technique for noninvasive estimation of electrical properties (EP) from magnetic resonance measurements. Previous work evaluated GMT using ideal radiofrequency (RF) excitations. The aim of this simulation study was to assess GMT performance with a realistic RF coil. METHODS: We designed a transmit-receive RF coil with 8 decoupled channels for 7T head imaging. We calculated the RF transmit field ( B1+) inside heterogeneous head models for different RF shimming approaches, and used them as input for GMT to reconstruct EP for all voxels. RESULTS: Coil tuning/decoupling remained relatively stable when the coil was loaded with different head models. Mean error in EP estimation changed from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] and from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] for relative permittivity and conductivity, respectively, when changing head model without re-tuning the coil. Results slightly improved when an SVD-based RF shimming algorithm was applied, in place of excitation with one coil at a time. Despite errors in EP, RF transmit field ( B1+) and absorbed power could be predicted with less than [Formula: see text] error over the entire head. GMT could accurately detect a numerically inserted tumor. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates that GMT can reliably reconstruct EP in realistic simulated scenarios using a tailored 8-channel RF coil design at 7T. Future work will focus on construction of the coil and optimization of GMT's robustness to noise, to enable in-vivo GMT experiments. SIGNIFICANCE: GMT could provide accurate estimations of tissue EP, which could be used as biomarkers and could enable patient-specific estimation of RF power deposition, which is an unsolved problem for ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging.
OBJECTIVE: Global Maxwell Tomography (GMT) is a recently introduced volumetric technique for noninvasive estimation of electrical properties (EP) from magnetic resonance measurements. Previous work evaluated GMT using ideal radiofrequency (RF) excitations. The aim of this simulation study was to assess GMT performance with a realistic RF coil. METHODS: We designed a transmit-receive RF coil with 8 decoupled channels for 7T head imaging. We calculated the RF transmit field ( B1+) inside heterogeneous head models for different RF shimming approaches, and used them as input for GMT to reconstruct EP for all voxels. RESULTS: Coil tuning/decoupling remained relatively stable when the coil was loaded with different head models. Mean error in EP estimation changed from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] and from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] for relative permittivity and conductivity, respectively, when changing head model without re-tuning the coil. Results slightly improved when an SVD-based RF shimming algorithm was applied, in place of excitation with one coil at a time. Despite errors in EP, RF transmit field ( B1+) and absorbed power could be predicted with less than [Formula: see text] error over the entire head. GMT could accurately detect a numerically inserted tumor. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates that GMT can reliably reconstruct EP in realistic simulated scenarios using a tailored 8-channel RF coil design at 7T. Future work will focus on construction of the coil and optimization of GMT's robustness to noise, to enable in-vivo GMT experiments. SIGNIFICANCE: GMT could provide accurate estimations of tissue EP, which could be used as biomarkers and could enable patient-specific estimation of RF power deposition, which is an unsolved problem for ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging.
Authors: Jorge Fernandez Villena; Athanasios G Polimeridis; Yigitcan Eryaman; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald; Jacob K White; Luca Daniel Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Ann P O'Rourke; Mariya Lazebnik; John M Bertram; Mark C Converse; Susan C Hagness; John G Webster; David M Mahvi Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-07-18 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Stefano Mandija; Alessandro Sbrizzi; Ulrich Katscher; Peter R Luijten; Cornelis A T van den Berg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Leeor Alon; Cem Murat Deniz; Giuseppe Carluccio; Ryan Brown; Daniel K Sodickson; Christopher M Collins Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 1.176
Authors: Xiaotong Zhang; Sebastian Schmitter; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Jiaen Liu; Bin He Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Ilias I Giannakopoulos; Georgy D Guryev; José E C Serrallés; Ioannis P Georgakis; Luca Daniel; Jacob K White; Riccardo Lattanzi Journal: IEEE Trans Antennas Propag Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.388