Qays Kharouf1, A Marie Phillips1,2, Lauren E Bleakley1, Emma Morrisroe1, Julia Oyrer1, Linghan Jia1, Andreas Ludwig3, Liang Jin4, Joseph A Nicolazzo4, Elisabetta Cerbai5, M Novella Romanelli5, Steven Petrou1, Christopher A Reid1. 1. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 2. School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 3. Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 5. Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are encoded by four genes (HCN1-4) with distinct biophysical properties and functions within the brain. HCN4 channels activate slowly at robust hyperpolarizing potentials, making them more likely to be engaged during hyperexcitable neuronal network activity seen during seizures. HCN4 channels are also highly expressed in thalamic nuclei, a brain region implicated in seizure generalization. Here, we assessed the utility of targeting the HCN4 channel as an anti-seizure strategy using pharmacological and genetic approaches. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The impact of reducing HCN4 channel function on seizure susceptibility and neuronal network excitability was studied using an HCN4 channel preferring blocker (EC18) and a conditional brain specific HCN4 knockout mouse model. KEY RESULTS: EC18 (10 mg·kg-1 ) and brain-specific HCN4 channel knockout reduced seizure susceptibility and proconvulsant-mediated cortical spiking recorded using electrocorticography, with minimal effects on other mouse behaviours. EC18 (10 μM) decreased neuronal network bursting in mouse cortical cultures. Importantly, EC18 was not protective against proconvulsant-mediated seizures in the conditional HCN4 channel knockout mouse and did not reduce bursting behaviour in AAV-HCN4 shRNA infected mouse cortical cultures. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest the HCN4 channel as a potential pharmacologically relevant target for anti-seizure drugs that is likely to have a low side-effect liability in the CNS.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels are encoded by four genes (HCN1-4) with distinct biophysical properties and functions within the brain. HCN4 channels activate slowly at robust hyperpolarizing potentials, making them more likely to be engaged during hyperexcitable neuronal network activity seen during seizures. HCN4 channels are also highly expressed in thalamic nuclei, a brain region implicated in seizure generalization. Here, we assessed the utility of targeting the HCN4 channel as an anti-seizure strategy using pharmacological and genetic approaches. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The impact of reducing HCN4 channel function on seizure susceptibility and neuronal network excitability was studied using an HCN4 channel preferring blocker (EC18) and a conditional brain specific HCN4 knockout mouse model. KEY RESULTS: EC18 (10 mg·kg-1 ) and brain-specific HCN4 channel knockout reduced seizure susceptibility and proconvulsant-mediated cortical spiking recorded using electrocorticography, with minimal effects on other mouse behaviours. EC18 (10 μM) decreased neuronal network bursting in mouse cortical cultures. Importantly, EC18 was not protective against proconvulsant-mediated seizures in the conditional HCN4 channel knockout mouse and did not reduce bursting behaviour in AAV-HCN4 shRNA infectedmouse cortical cultures. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data suggest the HCN4 channel as a potential pharmacologically relevant target for anti-seizure drugs that is likely to have a low side-effect liability in the CNS.
Authors: Michael J Curtis; Steve Alexander; Giuseppe Cirino; James R Docherty; Christopher H George; Mark A Giembycz; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Yong Ji; David J MacEwan; Christopher G Sobey; S Clare Stanford; Mauro M Teixeira; Sue Wonnacott; Amrita Ahluwalia Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Verena Hammelmann; Marc Sebastian Stieglitz; Henrik Hülle; Karim Le Meur; Jennifer Kass; Manuela Brümmer; Christian Gruner; René Dominik Rötzer; Stefanie Fenske; Jana Hartmann; Benedikt Zott; Anita Lüthi; Saskia Spahn; Markus Moser; Dirk Isbrandt; Andreas Ludwig; Arthur Konnerth; Christian Wahl-Schott; Martin Biel Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-05-02
Authors: Joseph A Nicolazzo; Jessica A Steuten; Susan A Charman; Nerida Taylor; Philip J Davies; Steven Petrou Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Date: 2010-01-17 Impact factor: 2.557
Authors: Kim L Powell; Caroline Ng; Terence J O'Brien; Sheng Hong Xu; David A Williams; Simon J Foote; Christopher A Reid Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: G D C Mendis; G Berecki; E Morrisroe; S Pachernegg; M Li; M Varney; P B Osborne; C A Reid; S Halgamuge; S Petrou Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Qays Kharouf; A Marie Phillips; Lauren E Bleakley; Emma Morrisroe; Julia Oyrer; Linghan Jia; Andreas Ludwig; Liang Jin; Joseph A Nicolazzo; Elisabetta Cerbai; M Novella Romanelli; Steven Petrou; Christopher A Reid Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 8.739