Literature DB >> 32363701

Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

C A Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs1, I R van Osch1, M W Heymans2, W Ganzevoort3, L J Schoonmade4, C J Bax3, Bwj Mol5, Cjm de Groot1, Pmm Bossuyt6, M A de Boer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone - standard of practice - for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Meta-analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Ten centres provided 17 data sets for 21 661 participants, 18 731 of which could be included. Sample sizes per data set ranged from 207 to 9215 individuals. Patient populations varied from uncomplicated to complicated pregnancies.
METHODS: In a collaborative, pooled analysis, we compared the prognostic value of combining CPR with UA PI, versus UA PI only and CPR only, with a one-stage IPD approach. After multiple imputation of missing values, we used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to develop prediction models. We evaluated the classification performance of all models with receiver operating characteristics analysis. We performed subgroup analyses according to gestational age, birthweight centile and estimated fetal weight centile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission.
RESULTS: Adverse outcomes occurred in 3423 (18%) participants. The model with UA PI alone resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI 0.709-0.828) and with CPR alone in an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.715-0.831). Addition of CPR to the UA PI model resulted in an increase in the AUC of 0.003 points (0.778, 95% CI 0.714-0.831). These results were consistent across all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Cerebroplacental ratio added no predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome beyond UA PI, when assessing singleton pregnancies, irrespective of gestational age or fetal size. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Doppler measurement of cerebroplacental ratio in clinical practice has limited added predictive value to umbilical artery alone.
© 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebroplacental ratio; Doppler; fetal growth restriction; individual participant data; meta-analysis; middle cerebral artery; prognostic accuracy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32363701      PMCID: PMC7818434          DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   7.331


  33 in total

Review 1.  Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Ahmed Abobakr Nassr; Ahmed M Abdelmagied; Sherif A M Shazly
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 2.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Tamara Stampalija; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  D Gramellini; M C Folli; S Raboni; E Vadora; A Merialdi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.

Authors:  Lesley A Stewart; Mike Clarke; Maroeska Rovers; Richard D Riley; Mark Simmonds; Gavin Stewart; Jayne F Tierney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Variation in outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials of interventions for prevention and treatment of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  R Townsend; F Sileo; L Stocker; H Kumbay; P Healy; S Gordijn; W Ganzevoort; I Beune; A Baschat; L Kenny; F Bloomfield; M Daly; D Devane; A Papageorghiou; A Khalil
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 6.  Review: Systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Liam Dunn; Helen Sherrell; Sailesh Kumar
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weight vs a combined screening model in the third trimester.

Authors:  J Miranda; M Rodriguez-Lopez; S Triunfo; M Sairanen; H Kouru; M Parra-Saavedra; F Crovetto; F Figueras; F Crispi; E Gratacós
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Efforts to retrieve individual participant data sets for use in a meta-analysis result in moderate data sharing but many data sets remain missing.

Authors:  Joshua R Polanin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Benoit Villain; Agnès Dechartres; Patrick Boyer; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.

Authors:  J Stirnemann; J Villar; L J Salomon; E Ohuma; P Ruyan; D G Altman; F Nosten; R Craik; S Munim; L Cheikh Ismail; F C Barros; A Lambert; S Norris; M Carvalho; Y A Jaffer; J A Noble; E Bertino; M G Gravett; M Purwar; C G Victora; R Uauy; Z Bhutta; S Kennedy; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  5 in total

1.  The CErebro Placental RAtio as indicator for delivery following perception of reduced fetal movements, protocol for an international cluster randomised clinical trial; the CEPRA study.

Authors:  Stefanie E Damhuis; Wessel Ganzevoort; Ruben G Duijnhoven; Henk Groen; Sailesh Kumar; Alexander E P Heazell; Asma Khalil; Sanne J Gordijn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  An integrated approach based on advanced CTG parameters and Doppler measurements for late growth restriction management.

Authors:  Giovanni Magenes; Giuseppe Maria Maruotti; Maria Gabriella Signorini; Giuseppina Esposito; Nicolò Pini; Salvatore Tagliaferri; Marta Campanile; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses.

Authors:  Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  C A Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs; I R van Osch; M W Heymans; W Ganzevoort; L J Schoonmade; C J Bax; Bwj Mol; Cjm de Groot; Pmm Bossuyt; M A de Boer
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 7.331

5.  Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  H Wolf; T Stampalija; C C Lees
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 7.299

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.