| Literature DB >> 32363659 |
Jonas Schätti1, Valentin Köhler1, Marcel Mayor1,2,3, Yaakov Y Fein4, Philipp Geyer4, Lukas Mairhofer4, Stefan Gerlich4, Markus Arndt4.
Abstract
Studies of neutral biomolecules in the gas phase allow for the study of molecular properties in the absence of solvent and charge effects, thus complementing spectroscopic and analytical methods in solution or in ion traps. Some properties, such as the static electronic susceptibility, are best accessed in experiments that act on the motion of the neutral molecules in an electric field. Here, we screen seven peptides for their thermal stability and electron impact ionizability. We identify two tripeptides as sufficiently volatile and thermostable to be evaporated and interfered in the long-baseline universal matter-wave interferometer. Monitoring the deflection of the interferometric molecular nanopattern in a tailored external electric field allows us to measure the static molecular susceptibility of Ala-Trp-Ala and Ala-Ala-Trp bearing fluorinated alkyl chains at C- and N-termini. The respective values are 4 π ε 0 × 330 ± 150 Å 3 and 4 π ε 0 × 270 ± 80 Å 3 .Entities:
Keywords: deflectometry; matter-waves; molecular beams; molecule interferometry; tripeptides
Year: 2020 PMID: 32363659 PMCID: PMC7317408 DOI: 10.1002/jms.4514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mass Spectrom ISSN: 1076-5174 Impact factor: 1.982
FIGURE 1Tailored tripeptides that successfully showed matter‐wave interference. Among the tested compounds (see Supporting Information), 1 and 2 proved the most compatible for use in a long‐baseline molecule interferometer [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2Long baseline molecule interferometer and electric deflectometer. The peptides are evaporated in an oven (left), pass the three gratings (G1–G3), and are ionized by electron impact and mass‐selected in a quadrupole mass spectrometer (right). G1 and G3 are 266‐nm transmission gratings implemented as nanofabricated structures in silicon nitride, whereas G3 is an optical phase grating implemented as a standing wave of 532‐nm light. Diffraction in G1 prepares transverse coherence to cover several nodes of the standing light wave, which forms G2, which satisfies the necessary interference condition to have at least two fundamentally indistinguishable semiclassical paths. The electrode after G2 imprints a position and velocity‐dependent phase, which shifts the interference pattern at the position of G3. We detect the interference pattern by shifting G3 transversely and counting the transmitted molecules
FIGURE 3Interferometric deflection of Compound 1. Scanning G3 over the molecular beam and counting the molecules reveal interference as a sinusoidal modulation of the transmitted flux. (A)–(C) shows the increasing deflection for 250 V (undeflected with respect to the reference at the same voltage), 500 V, and 750 V, respectively. Blue circles indicate interference scans with a reference voltage at 250 V. Red squares show data with taken deflection voltage. The data contains an unsubtracted dark rate of 15 counts/s, with each point integrated for 3 s
FIGURE 4Matter‐wave assisted Stark deflectometry. The interference fringes shift laterally when the homogeneous ( field is increased by ramping up the deflection voltage. From the quadratic dependence of the fringe position on electrode voltage, we derive the susceptibility . The error bars represent 68% confidence intervals of the fitted phases. Blue circles are Compound 1, and red squares are Compound 2 [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]