BACKGROUND: Patients can provide valuable information missing from traditional sources of safety data, thus adding new insights about factors that lead to preventable harm. In this study, researchers determined associations between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms experienced after an adverse event (AE). METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of a national sample of patient-reported AEs (surgical, medication, diagnostic, and hospital-acquired infection) gathered through an online questionnaire between January 2010 and February 2016. Generalized logit multivariable regression was used to assess the association between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms (grouped as nonphysical harm only, physical harm only, physical harm and emotional or financial harm, and all three harms) and adjusted for patient and AE characteristics. RESULTS: One third of patients (32.6%) reported experiencing all three harms, 27.3% reported physical harms and one additional harm, 25.5% reported physical harms only, and 14.7% reported nonphysical harms only. Patients reporting all three harms were 2.5 times more likely to have filed a report with a responsible authority (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-5.01) and 3.3 times more likely to have also experienced a surgical complication (95% CI = 1.42-7.51). Odds of reporting problems related to communication between clinician and patients/families or clinician-related behavioral issues was 13% higher in those experiencing all three harm types (95% CI = 1.07-1.19). CONCLUSION: Patients' experiences are important to identify safety issues and reduce harm and should be included in patient safety measurement and improvement activities. These findings underscore the need for policy and practice changes to identify, address, and support harmed patients.
BACKGROUND:Patients can provide valuable information missing from traditional sources of safety data, thus adding new insights about factors that lead to preventable harm. In this study, researchers determined associations between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms experienced after an adverse event (AE). METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of a national sample of patient-reported AEs (surgical, medication, diagnostic, and hospital-acquired infection) gathered through an online questionnaire between January 2010 and February 2016. Generalized logit multivariable regression was used to assess the association between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-reported harms (grouped as nonphysical harm only, physical harm only, physical harm and emotional or financial harm, and all three harms) and adjusted for patient and AE characteristics. RESULTS: One third of patients (32.6%) reported experiencing all three harms, 27.3% reported physical harms and one additional harm, 25.5% reported physical harms only, and 14.7% reported nonphysical harms only. Patients reporting all three harms were 2.5 times more likely to have filed a report with a responsible authority (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-5.01) and 3.3 times more likely to have also experienced a surgical complication (95% CI = 1.42-7.51). Odds of reporting problems related to communication between clinician and patients/families or clinician-related behavioral issues was 13% higher in those experiencing all three harm types (95% CI = 1.07-1.19). CONCLUSION:Patients' experiences are important to identify safety issues and reduce harm and should be included in patient safety measurement and improvement activities. These findings underscore the need for policy and practice changes to identify, address, and support harmed patients.
Authors: Alisa Khan; Maitreya Coffey; Katherine P Litterer; Jennifer D Baird; Stephannie L Furtak; Briana M Garcia; Michele A Ashland; Sharon Calaman; Nicholas C Kuzma; Jennifer K O'Toole; Aarti Patel; Glenn Rosenbluth; Lauren A Destino; Jennifer L Everhart; Brian P Good; Jennifer H Hepps; Anuj K Dalal; Stuart R Lipsitz; Catherine S Yoon; Katherine R Zigmont; Rajendu Srivastava; Amy J Starmer; Theodore C Sectish; Nancy D Spector; Daniel C West; Christopher P Landrigan; Brenda K Allair; Claire Alminde; Wilma Alvarado-Little; Marisa Atsatt; Megan E Aylor; James F Bale; Dorene Balmer; Kevin T Barton; Carolyn Beck; Zia Bismilla; Rebecca L Blankenburg; Debra Chandler; Amanda Choudhary; Eileen Christensen; Sally Coghlan-McDonald; F Sessions Cole; Elizabeth Corless; Sharon Cray; Roxi Da Silva; Devesh Dahale; Benard Dreyer; Amanda S Growdon; LeAnn Gubler; Amy Guiot; Roben Harris; Helen Haskell; Irene Kocolas; Elizabeth Kruvand; Michele Marie Lane; Kathleen Langrish; Christy J W Ledford; Kheyandra Lewis; Joseph O Lopreiato; Christopher G Maloney; Amanda Mangan; Peggy Markle; Fernando Mendoza; Dale Ann Micalizzi; Vineeta Mittal; Maria Obermeyer; Katherine A O'Donnell; Mary Ottolini; Shilpa J Patel; Rita Pickler; Jayne Elizabeth Rogers; Lee M Sanders; Kimberly Sauder; Samir S Shah; Meesha Sharma; Arabella Simpkin; Anupama Subramony; E Douglas Thompson; Laura Trueman; Tanner Trujillo; Michael P Turmelle; Cindy Warnick; Chelsea Welch; Andrew J White; Matthew F Wien; Ariel S Winn; Stephanie Wintch; Michael Wolf; H Shonna Yin; Clifton E Yu Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Traber Davis Giardina; Beth J King; Aartee P Ignaczak; Douglas E Paull; Laura Hoeksema; Peter D Mills; Julia Neily; Robin R Hemphill; Hardeep Singh Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Sigall K Bell; Stephanie D Roche; Ariel Mueller; Erica Dente; Kristin O'Reilly; Barbara Sarnoff Lee; Kenneth Sands; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Elaine C Khoong; Anjana E Sharma; Kiran Gupta; Julia Adler-Milstein; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 6.473