| Literature DB >> 32358005 |
Corey Nelson1,2, Ana Giraldo-Silva1,2, Ferran Garcia-Pichel3,2.
Abstract
Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are globally important microbial communities inhabiting the top layer of soils. They provide multiple services to dryland ecosystems but are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbance from which they naturally recover only slowly. Assisted inoculation with cyanobacteria is held as a promising approach to promote biocrust regeneration. Two different methodologies have been developed for this purpose: mass cultivation of biocrust pioneer species (such as the cyanobacteria Microcoleus spp.) on cellulose supports, and polymicrobial cultivation of biocrusts in soils within greenhouse settings. Here, we aimed to test a novel method to grow cyanobacterial biocrust inoculum based on fog irrigation of soil substrates (FISS) that can be used with either culture-based or mixed-community approaches. We found that the FISS system presents clear advantages over previous inoculum production methodologies; overall, FISS eliminates the need for specialized facilities and decreases user effort. Specifically, there were increased microbial yields and simplification of design compared to those of the culture-based and mixed-community approaches, respectively. Its testing also allows us to make recommendations on underexplored aspects of biocrust restoration: (i) field inoculation levels should be equal to or greater than the biomass found in the substrate and (ii) practices regarding evaluation of cyanobacterial biomass should, under certain circumstances, include proxies additional to chlorophyll a IMPORTANCE Biocrust inoculum production for use in dryland rehabilitation is a powerful tool in combating the degradation of dryland ecosystems. However, the facilities and effort required to produce high-quality inoculum are often a barrier to effective large-scale implementation by land managers. By unifying and optimizing the two foremost methods for cyanobacterial biocrust inoculum production, our work improves on the ease and cost with which biocrust restoration technology can be translated to practical widespread implementation.Entities:
Keywords: biocrusts; biological soil crusts; cultivation; cyanobacteria; degraded dryland soils; soil restoration
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32358005 PMCID: PMC7301847 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00624-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792