| Literature DB >> 32357832 |
Carlos Trujillo-Moya1, Andrea Ganthaler2, Wolfgang Stöggl2, Ilse Kranner2, Silvio Schüler3, Reinhard Ertl4, Sarah Schlosser4, Jan-Peter George5, Stefan Mayr2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Norway spruce trees in subalpine forests frequently face infections by the needle rust fungus Chrysomyxa rhododendri, which causes significant growth decline and increased mortality of young trees. Yet, it is unknown whether trees actively respond to fungal attack by activating molecular defence responses and/or respective gene expression.Entities:
Keywords: Conifer; Forest tree; Fungal infection; Host-pathogen-interaction; PR proteins; Phenolic compounds; RNA sequencing; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32357832 PMCID: PMC7195740 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6587-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Study design. Design of plant treatment and sampling. Genetically identical cuttings were positioned for 39 days in a control and an infection tent (n = 3, respectively), the latter equipped for the first 21 days with rhododendron branches covered by mature C. rhododendri spore stocks. Fans improved spore distribution and microscopic slides collected spores for concentration monitoring. One current-year shoot per plant and time point was cut, the needles detached and stored at −80 ° C for RNA and phenolic analyses. Note that on day 39 infection symptoms were clearly visible on treated cuttings and needles were separated into healthy and symptomized ones
Summary of RNA-sequencing and mapping results
| Time point | Condition | Number of input reads | Number of uniquely mapped reads | Uniquely mapped reads % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Baseline Control | 22,035,322 (18,767,889-26,400,889) | 17,130,560 (14,538,711-20,630,864) | 77.69 (77.47–78.14) |
| T4 | Control | 22,496,254 (19,113,114-25,212,429) | 17,574,219 (14,954,558-19,584,476) | 78.14 (77.68–78.5) |
| T9 | Control | 19,503,128 (18,889,722-20,042,058) | 15,364,519 (14,898,108-15,598,512) | 78.79 (77.82–79.68) |
| T21 | Control | 22,109,409 (19,805,446-26,471,942) | 17,150,393 (15,345,112-20,413,654) | 77.62 (77.11–78.26) |
| T39 | Control | 20,954,099 (19,548,183-22,982,591) | 16,150,647 (15,021,861-17,772,272) | 77.06 (76.85–77.33) |
| T4 | Infected | 20,294,334 (17,827,443-22,137,544) | 16,042,961 (14,297,556-17,475,634) | 79.11 (78.19–80.20) |
| T9 | Infected | 20,571,206 (17,652,233-22,094,245) | 16,243,524 (13,782,277-17,487,010) | 78.91 (78.08–79.61) |
| T21 | Infected | 18,552,412 (18,380,964-18,769,955) | 10,972,473 (9,567,906-12,175,200) | 59.18 (50.97–65.79) |
| T39 | Infected with symptoms | 18,284,058 (17,804,501-18,763,615) | 6,652,156 (6,600,580-6,703,731) | 36.42 (35.18–37.65) |
| T39 | Infected without symptoms | 20,227,789 (19,812,720-20,642,858) | 15,663,373 (15,240,145-16,086,601) | 77.43 (76.92–77.93) |
legend: Numbers in parentheses show the range between the three technical replicates
Fig. 2Principal component analysis (PCA) of differentially expressed transcripts. Note the high conformance within the three replicates and clear separation between controls and infection treatment at 21 and 39 dpi (symptomatic needles)
Fig. 3Venn’s diagrams of over- and under-expressed transcripts. Overlap between differentially expressed transcripts in Picea abies plants infected with Chrysomyxa rhododendri compared to control plants at the four time points after infestation (4 dpi, 9 dpi, 21 dpi, 39 dpi symptomatic needles)
Fig. 4Number of differentially expressed transcripts in infested needles of Picea abies. Time course of (a) number and (b) proportions of over- and under-expressed transcripts between 4 and 39 dpi (symptomatic needles)
Fig. 5Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis. GO terms overrepresented in over- or under-expressed transcripts of Picea abies needles infected by needle rust at (a) 4 dpi, (b) 9 dpi, (c) 21 dpi, and (d) 39 dpi (symptomatic needles). Terms ranked by the corrected p-value
KEGG pathways of differentially expressed genes by Picea abies infected by Chrysomyxa rhododendri
| 4dpi | 9dpi | 21dpi | 39dpi | |||||
| OVER | UNDER | OVER | UNDER | OVER | UNDER | OVER | UNDER | |
| 00010 Glycolysis / Gluconeogenesis | ||||||||
| 00020 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | ||||||||
| 00030 Pentose phosphate pathway | ||||||||
| 00040 Pentose and glucuronate interconversions | ||||||||
| 00051 Fructose and mannose metabolism | ||||||||
| 00052 Galactose metabolism | ||||||||
| 00053 Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism | ||||||||
| 00500 Starch and sucrose metabolism | ||||||||
| 00520 Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | ||||||||
| 00620 Pyruvate metabolism | ||||||||
| 00630 Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | ||||||||
| 00562 Inositol phosphate metabolism | ||||||||
| 00190 Oxidative phosphorylation | ||||||||
| 00195 Photosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00196 Photosynthesis - antenna proteins | ||||||||
| 00710 Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms | ||||||||
| 00910 Nitrogen metabolism | ||||||||
| 00920 Sulfur metabolism | ||||||||
| 00061 Fatty acid biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00071 Fatty acid degradation | ||||||||
| 00073 Cutin, suberine and wax biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00561 Glycerolipid metabolism | ||||||||
| 00564 Glycerophospholipid metabolism | ||||||||
| 00565 Ether lipid metabolism | ||||||||
| 00600 Sphingolipid metabolism | ||||||||
| 00592 alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism | ||||||||
| 01040 Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | ||||||||
| 00230 Purine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00240 Pyrimidine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00250 Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism | ||||||||
| 00260 Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00270 Cysteine and methionine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00280 Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation | ||||||||
| 00220 Arginine biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00330 Arginine and proline metabolism | ||||||||
| 00350 Tyrosine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00360 Phenylalanine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00380 Tryptophan metabolism | ||||||||
| 00400 Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00410 beta-Alanine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00450 Selenocompound metabolism | ||||||||
| 00460 Cyanoamino acid metabolism | ||||||||
| 00480 Glutathione metabolism | ||||||||
| 00730 Thiamine metabolism | ||||||||
| 00740 Riboflavin metabolism | ||||||||
| 00790 Folate biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00670 One carbon pool by folate | ||||||||
| 00860 Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | ||||||||
| 00130 Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00900 Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00904 Diterpenoid biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00906 Carotenoid biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00940 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 00941 Flavonoid biosynthesis | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| 03040 Spliceosome | ||||||||
| 03010 Ribosome | ||||||||
| 00970 Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | ||||||||
| 03013 RNA transport | ||||||||
| 03015 mRNA surveillance pathway | ||||||||
| 03060 Protein export | ||||||||
| 04141 Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum | ||||||||
| 04120 Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis | ||||||||
| 03050 Proteasome | ||||||||
| 03018 RNA degradation | ||||||||
| 04016 MAPK signaling pathway - plant | ||||||||
| 04070 Phosphatidylinositol signaling system | ||||||||
| 04075 Plant hormone signal transduction | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| 04144 Endocytosis | ||||||||
| 04145 Phagosome | ||||||||
| 04146 Peroxisome | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| 04712 Circadian rhythm - plant | ||||||||
| 04626 Plant-pathogen interaction | ||||||||
legend: Numbers refer to key enzymes represented by Picea abies KAAS assigned orthologous. For 39 dpi, only symptomatic needles were considered. To simplify the table, only those pathways with at least 3 key enzymes represented at one of the time points where considered (for full table see Additional file 5: Table S3)
Fig. 6Overview of the complex defense response. Shown are the main activated and inhibited pathways and processes in the different compartments of Picea abies cells during infection by Chrysomyxa rhododendri
Fig. 7RT-qPCR results of differentially expressed transcripts assigned to the pathways (a) plant-pathogen interaction, (b) MAPK signaling and (c) flavonoid biosynthesis. Relative expression levels (mean fold change ± SE, n = 3) were compared to control plants (set to 1) at 4 dpi, 9 dpi, 21 dpi and 39 dpi (symptomatic and non-symptomatic needles). *P < 0.05
Fig. 8Concentration changes of phenolic needle metabolites. Shoot elongation and compound concentrations from 1 to 39 dpi in needles of control (filled symbols, mean ± SE, n = 3) and spore exposed spruce cuttings (open symbols, mean ± SE, n = 3). Triangles on day 39 indicate concentrations in healthy needles of treated cuttings (mean ± SE, n = 3). Concentration values are given as μmol g−1 dry weight. Significant differences between time points are marked with different letters, between the control and treated group with asterisks and between healthy and symptomized needles of infested cuttings on day 39 with a circle. Patterns of all individual compounds measured are shown in Additional file 11: Fig. S5