| Literature DB >> 32355561 |
Felix Marsh-Wakefield1,2,3, Thomas Ashhurst1,3,4,5,6, Stephanie Trend7,8, Helen M McGuire1,3,5,9, Pierre Juillard1,2, Anna Zinger2, Anderson P Jones7, Allan G Kermode8,10, Simon Hawke2,11, Georges E Grau1,2, Prue H Hart7, Scott N Byrne1,3,12.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) targeting B cells are amongst the most effective for preventing multiple sclerosis (MS) progression. IgG3 antibodies and their uncharacterised B-cell clones are predicted to play a pathogenic role in MS. Identifying subsets of IgG3 + B cells involved in MS progression could improve diagnosis, could inform timely disease intervention and may lead to new DMTs that target B cells more specifically.Entities:
Keywords: B cells; clinically isolated syndrome; mass cytometry; multiple sclerosis; phototherapy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32355561 PMCID: PMC7190396 DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Immunology ISSN: 2050-0068
Figure 1Serum IgG3 levels correlate with IgG3 + B‐cell subsets. (a) IgG3 serum levels were compared with IgG3 + B‐cell levels (as a proportion of total B cells). (b) Manual gating strategy progressing from (i) to (iv) and beyond as indicated by the arrows to identify IgG3 +IgD−B cells and nine subsets using CD20, CD21, CD24, CD27 and CD38. (c) tSNE plots showing the position of the nine subsets and heatmap of markers used for gating and differentiating between these nine subsets. The proportions of subsets (d) 4 and (e) 9 had statistically significant correlations with IgG3 serum levels. Open black circles represent clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients who did not receive phototherapy (n = 8 patients, 25 time points), whilst open black squares represent patients who did receive phototherapy (n = 8 patients, 36 time points). A linear regression was done (with line shown), with reported P‐values and R 2‐values or ρ (rho)‐value. Mass cytometry data were generated from seven independent experiments.
Figure 2IgG3 + B‐cell levels positively correlate with CIS conversion to MS. (a) IgG3 + B‐cell levels (as a proportion of total B cells) are shown for clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients as they go on to convert to multiple sclerosis (MS). At time point 0 (vertical dotted line), patients were diagnosed with MS (prior to this, they had CIS). Open black squares represent CIS patients who received phototherapy (n = 7 patients, 28 time points), whilst open black circles did not receive phototherapy (n = 5 patients, 27 time points). A linear regression was done, with the line shown for CIS/prior (black, n = 12 patients, 34 time points) and MS/after with (green, n = 6 patients, 10 time points) or without (purple, n = 9 patients, 11 time points) disease‐modifying therapies (DMTs), with the reported P‐value and R 2‐value or ρ (rho)‐value. (b) Subsets of IgG3 + B cells that had significant correlations either CIS/prior or MS/after. Solid horizontal red line represents median proportion for non‐MS controls, with interquartile range highlighted in red between dashed horizontal red lines (n = 14 patients). Mass cytometry data were generated from seven independent experiments.
Figure 3IgG3 + B cells are decreased during inactive MS. (a) IgG3 + B‐cell levels as a proportion of total B cells between non‐MS controls, inactive MS (iMS) and active MS (aMS) patients. (b) IgG3 + B‐cell subsets 4, 7 and 8 that had significant differences between disease and control groups are shown as a proportion of total B cells. As no groups were normally distributed, a non‐parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons test (median shown) was used with P‐values shown. n = 7 or 8 individual patients/controls. Mass cytometry data were generated from two independent experiments.
Figure 4Phototherapy decreases IgG3 + B‐cell proportions in CIS patients. IgG3 + B‐cell levels (as a proportion of total B cells) were compared between clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients who either received phototherapy for 2 months and CIS patients who did not. (a) The change in IgG3 + B cells compared with baseline prior to phototherapy. CIS patients who received phototherapy are indicated in red, whilst CIS patients who did not are indicated in black open circles. A linear regression was done with shown P‐values and R 2‐values for CIS patients who did not receive phototherapy (black) or did receive phototherapy (red). Slopes of linear regression lines were compared between groups, by a comparable analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the P‐value reported in a black box. (b) Subsets of IgG3 + B cells that had significant differences between CIS patients who did or did not receive phototherapy. n = 8 individual patients. Mass cytometry data were generated from seven independent experiments.
Cohort 2 patient data
| Non‐MS controls ( | iMS ( | aMS ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median age (range) | 40 (25–59) | 50 (27–60) | 32 (25–42) |
| Female sex | 5 (62.5%) | 7 (87.5%) | 6 (85.7%) |
| Median EDSS (range) | |||
| Prior treatment | –– | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) |
| Current | –– | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–2.5) |
| Previous treatment prior to blood sampling | |||
| Time since last dose | |||
| Untreated | –– | 6 | 6 |
| 1 month | –– | 1 | 0 |
| 2 years | –– | 0 | 1 |
| 10 years | –– | 1 | 0 |
| Disease‐modifying therapy | |||
| Untreated | –– | 6 | 6 |
| IFN‐β | –– | 2 | 1 |
| Clinical/MRI activity prior to blood collection | |||
| Sensory symptoms > 1 year | –– | 3 | 0 |
| No symptoms > 9 months | –– | 3 | 0 |
| No disease activity > 4 years | –– | 2 | 0 |
| Activity < 6 months | –– | 0 | 7 |
| Lesion load | |||
| Brain | |||
| Low | –– | 7 | 4 |
| Moderate | –– | 1 | 1 |
| High | –– | 0 | 2 |
| Spinal | |||
| No | –– | 2 | 1 |
| Yes | –– | 6 | 3 |
| Several | –– | 0 | 1 |
| Enhancing | –– | 0 | 1 |
| Large + thoracic cord lesion | –– | 0 | 1 |
| Other characteristics | |||
| Pars planitis | –– | 1 | 0 |
Antibodies used for human mass cytometry staining
| Target | Isotope | Clone | Company | tSNE | IgG3 gating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | 155Gd | UCHT1 | BioLegend | ||
| CD19 | 142Nd | HIB19 | BD Biosciences | ✓ | |
| CD20 | 147Sm | 2H7 | BioLegend | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD21 | 152Sm | BU32 | BioLegend | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD23 | 144Nd | M‐L23.4 | Miltenyi Biotec | ✓ | |
| CD24 | 151Eu | ML5 | BioLegend | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD25 | 149Sm | 2A3 | BD Biosciences | ✓ | |
| CD27 | 167Er | M‐T271 | BioLegend | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD38 | 154Sm | HIT2 | BioLegend | ✓ | ✓ |
| CD45 | 104Pd | HI30 | BD Biosciences | ||
| 115In | |||||
| 209Bi | |||||
| CD71 | 164Er | CY1G4 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD79b | 153Eu | CB3‐2 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD80 | 162Dy | L307.4 | BD Biosciences | ✓ | |
| CD86 | 156Gd | IT2.2 | BD Biosciences | ✓ | |
| CD120a | 158Gd | REA252 | Miltenyi Biotec | ✓ | |
| CD120b | 160Gd | 3G7A02 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD138 | 150Nd | DL‐101 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD184 (CXCR4) | 175Lu | 12G5 | BD Biosciences | ✓ | |
| CD185 (CXCR5) | 146Nd | J252D4 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD210 (IL‐10 receptor) | 169Tm | REA239 | Miltenyi Biotec | ✓ | |
| CD267 (TACI) | 159Gd | 1A1 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD274 (PD‐L1) | 161Dy | 29E.2A3 | BioLegend | ✓ | |
| CD360 (IL‐21 receptor) | 165Ho | REA233 | Miltenyi Biotec | ✓ | |
| HLA‐DR | 174Yb | L243 | BD Biosciences | ✓ | |
| IgD | 89Y | IA6‐2 | BD Biosciences | ||
| IgE | 148Nd | MHE‐18 | BioLegend | ||
| IgG3 | 145Nd | HP6047 | BioLegend | ||
| IgG4 | 168Er | HP6023 | BioLegend | ||
| 5‐HT2A receptor | 166Er | Polyclonal | Novus Biologicals | ✓ | |
| PAF receptor | 163Dy | AA14 (clone21) | Cayman Chemicals | ✓ | |
| S1P1 | 170Er | MM0045‐21L9 | Novus Biologicals | ✓ | |
| TNF (membrane) | 141Pr | Mab11 | BioLegend | ✓ |
Markers used to run tSNE plots.
Markers used for gating IgG3 + B‐cell subsets.
Isotopes conjugated by the Ramaciotti Facility for Human Systems Biology, The University of Sydney, Australia.
CD45 was used for barcoding to allow up to three samples to be stained together.