| Literature DB >> 30057580 |
Stephanie Trend1, Anderson P Jones1, Lilian Cha1, Scott N Byrne2, Sian Geldenhuys1, Marzena J Fabis-Pedrini3, William M Carroll3, Judith M Cole4, David R Booth2, Robyn M Lucas5,6, Allan G Kermode3,7, Martyn A French8, Prue H Hart1.
Abstract
Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is a first episode of neurological symptoms that may precede a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, studying individuals with CIS may lead to breakthroughs in understanding the development and pathogenesis of MS. In this study, serum levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, IgM, and IgG1-4 were measured in 20 people with CIS and compared with those in 10 healthy controls (HC) and 8 people with MS. Serum Ig levels in individuals with CIS were compared with (a) the time to their conversion from CIS to MS, (b) serum levels of antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus, (c) frequencies of T regulatory (Treg), T follicular regulatory (Tfr), and B cell subsets, and (d) Treg/Tfr expression of Helios. Serum IgG, IgM, and IgG2 levels were significantly lower in people with CIS than HC, and IgG, IgM, and IgG1 levels were significantly lower in people with CIS than MS. After adjusting for age, sex, and serum 25(OH) vitamin D3 [25(OH)D] levels, CIS was associated with lower serum levels of IgG and IgG2 compared with HC (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). People with MS had lower IgG2 levels (p < 0.001) and IgG2 proportions (%IgG; p = 0.007) compared with HC. After adjusting for age, sex, and 25(OH)D, these outcomes remained, in addition to lower serum IgA levels (p = 0.01) and increased IgG3 levels (p = 0.053) in people with MS compared with HC. Furthermore, serum from people with MS had increased proportions of IgG1 and IgG3 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively), decreased proportions of IgG2 (p = 0.007), and greater ratios of "upstream" to "downstream" IgG subclasses (p = 0.001) compared with HC. Serum IgG3 proportions (%IgG) from people with CIS correlated with the frequency of plasmablasts in peripheral blood (p = 0.02). Expression of Helios by Treg and Tfr cell subsets from individuals with CIS correlated with levels of serum IgG2 and IgG4. IgG3 levels and proportions of IgG3 (%IgG) in serum at CIS diagnosis were inversely correlated with the time until conversion to MS (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively), suggesting they may be useful prognostic markers of individuals with CIS who rapidly convert to MS.Entities:
Keywords: antibody; biomarkers; clinically isolated syndrome; immunoglobulin; multiple sclerosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30057580 PMCID: PMC6053531 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Characteristics of the healthy controls (HC), people with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or multiple sclerosis (MS) included in the dataset.
| HC ( | CIS ( | MS ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [median (minimum–maximum)] | 35.4 (25.5–46.9) | 38.0 (23.4–54.3) | 45.0 (18.4–54.6) | 0.64 |
| Female sex [ | 8 (80) | 12 (60) | 5 (62.5) | 0.54 |
| Serum 25(OH)D (nmol/L) [median (minimum–maximum)] | 67.7 (37.9–84.9) | 88.5 (43.7–135.6) | 76.5 (40.8–108.2) | |
| Anti-viral capsid antigen IgG [U/mL; median (minimum–maximum)] | ND | 289 (73.8–750 | 550.5 (72.8–750 | 0.12 |
| Anti-EBV nuclear antigen-1 IgG [U/mL; median (minimum–maximum)] | ND | 600 (159–600 | 426 (38.8–600 | 0.86 |
| Time since diagnosis of CIS or MS (days) [median (minimum–maximum)] | n/a | 36.5 (−1 to 94) | 6 (0–2,537) | |
Superscript letter indicates groups which were significantly different to one another in post-test.
Bold font and shading indicates a statistically significant p value.
*Lower limit of detection of assay.
.
n/a, not applicable; ND, not done; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus.
Figure 1Total IgG (A), IgA (B), and IgM (C) concentrations in serum from healthy controls (HC) averaged over a 1-year collection period (n = 10; open bars) compared with people with recently diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 20; shaded bars) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 8, diagonal lines in bars). Individual values are shown and group medians are indicated by the horizontal bar. Statistically significant comparisons in Mann–Whitney tests (p < 0.05) are indicated with as asterisk.
Figure 2Serum concentrations of IgG subclasses, (A) IgG1, (B) IgG2, (C) IgG3, and (D) IgG4 from healthy controls (HC) averaged over a 1-year collection period (n = 10; open bars) compared with people with recently diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 20; shaded bars) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 8, diagonal lines in bars). Individual values are shown and group medians are indicated by the horizontal bar. Statistically significant comparisons in Mann–Whitney tests (p < 0.05) are indicated with as asterisk and very significant comparisons (p < 0.01) are indicated with two asterisks.
Figure 3Proportions of calculated (A) IgG1, (B) IgG2, (C) IgG3, and (D) IgG4 subclasses as a percent of total IgG shown in Figure 1 from healthy controls (HC) (n = 10; open bars) compared with people with recently diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 20; shaded bars) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 8, diagonal lines in bars). Individual values are shown and group medians are indicated by the horizontal bar. Statistically significant comparisons in Mann–Whitney tests (p < 0.05) are indicated with as asterisk.
Figure 4Ratios of calculated IgG1 (%IgG) + IgG3 (%IgG) to IgG2 (%IgG) + IgG4 (%IgG) in serum from healthy controls (HC) averaged over a 1-year collection period (n = 10; open bars) compared with people with recently diagnosed clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (n = 20; shaded bars) and multiple sclerosis (MS) (n = 8, diagonal lines in bars). Individual values are shown and group medians are indicated by the horizontal bar. Statistically significant comparisons in Mann–Whitney tests (p < 0.05) are indicated with as asterisk.
Results of regression analyses for serum immunoglobulin levels, adjusting for clinical variables.
| Outcome variable | Independent variable | Unadjusted estimate | 95% Confidence interval | ||
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Total IgG (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | −1,703.39 | −5,511.1 | 2,104.33 | 0.38 |
| CIS vs. HC | −5,574.52 | −8,966.63 | −2,182.41 | ||
| Male vs. female sex | −606.79 | −3,324.34 | 2,110.76 | 0.66 | |
| Age | −57.68 | −202.69 | 87.33 | 0.44 | |
| 25(OH)D | 13.99 | −45.57 | 73.56 | 0.65 | |
| IgA (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | −1,352.97 | −2,427.85 | −278.09 | |
| CIS vs. HC | −887.93 | −1,845.49 | 69.63 | 0.069 | |
| Male vs. female sex | 259.36 | −507.78 | 1,026.50 | 0.51 | |
| Age | −31.69 | −72.63 | 9.24 | 0.13 | |
| 25(OH)D | 6.652 | −10.16 | 23.47 | 0.44 | |
| IgM (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | 502.84 | 54.34 | 951.34 | |
| CIS vs. HC | −209.65 | −609.19 | 189.90 | 0.30 | |
| Male vs. female sex | −494.65 | −814.74 | −147.55 | ||
| Age | −2.38 | −19.46 | 14.70 | 0.785 | |
| 25(OH)D | −6.03 | −13.05 | 0.99 | 0.09 | |
| Calculated IgG1 (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | 1,213.67 | −1,957.62 | 4,384.96 | 0.45 |
| CIS vs. HC | −2,523.73 | −5,348.88 | 301.42 | 0.08 | |
| Male vs. female sex | −591.83 | −2,855.17 | 1,671.51 | 0.61 | |
| Age | −25.95 | −146.72 | 94.82 | 0.67 | |
| 25(OH)D | 4.75 | −44.86 | 54.36 | 0.85 | |
| IgG2 (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | −3,177.1 | −4,718.33 | −1,635.86 | |
| CIS vs. HC | −2,693.94 | −4,066.95 | −1,320.93 | ||
| Male vs. female sex | 161.04 | −938.94 | 1,261.01 | 0.77 | |
| Age | −7.50 | −66.19 | 51.20 | 0.8 | |
| 25(OH)D | 4.48 | −19.63 | 28.59 | 0.72 | |
| IgG3 (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | 544.22 | −7.10 | 1,095.54 | 0.053 |
| CIS vs. HC | −162.53 | −653.67 | 328.62 | 0.52 | |
| Male vs. female sex | −286.54 | −680.01 | 106.94 | 0.15 | |
| Age | −24.77 | −45.76 | −3.77 | ||
| 25(OH)D | 4.14 | −4.48 | 12.77 | 0.35 | |
| IgG4 (μg/mL) | MS vs. HC | −284.18 | −635.05 | 66.69 | 0.11 |
| CIS vs. HC | −194.32 | −506.89 | 118.25 | 0.22 | |
| Male vs. female sex | 110.54 | −139.88 | 360.95 | 0.39 | |
| Age | 0.53 | −12.83 | 13.89 | 0.94 | |
| 25(OH)D | 0.62 | −4.87 | 6.11 | 0.83 | |
| Calculated IgG1 (%IgG) | MS vs. HC | 16.25 | 0.84 | 31.66 | |
| CIS vs. HC | 3.74 | −9.99 | 17.47 | 0.59 | |
| Male vs. female sex | −2.49 | −13.49 | 8.51 | 0.66 | |
| Age | −0.08 | −0.66 | 0.51 | 0.80 | |
| 25(OH)D | 0.06 | −0.19 | 0.30 | 0.66 | |
| IgG2 (%IgG) | MS vs. HC | −19.9 | −34.33 | −5.47 | |
| CIS vs. HC | −6.29 | −19.14 | 6.56 | 0.34 | |
| Male vs. female sex | 1.20 | −9.10 | 11.5 | 0.82 | |
| Age | 0.19 | −0.36 | 0.74 | 0.51 | |
| 25(OH)D | −0.06 | −0.28 | 0.17 | 0.62 | |
| IgG3 (%IgG) | MS vs. HC | 5.00 | 0.69 | 9.31 | |
| CIS vs. HC | 2.14 | −1.70 | 5.98 | 0.28 | |
| Male vs. female sex | −0.33 | −3.40 | 2.75 | 0.84 | |
| Age | −0.16 | −0.33 | 0.003 | 0.054 | |
| 25(OH)D | 0.02 | −0.05 | 0.09 | 0.60 | |
| IgG4 (%IgG) | MS vs. HC | −1.36 | −4.36 | 1.64 | 0.38 |
| CIS vs. HC | 0.41 | −2.26 | 3.08 | 0.76 | |
| Male vs. female sex | 1.62 | −0.52 | 3.76 | 0.14 | |
| Age | 0.05 | −0.06 | 0.16 | 0.39 | |
| 25(OH)D | −0.02 | −0.06 | 0.03 | 0.52 | |
| Ratio of IgG1 + IgG3:IgG2 + IgG4 | MS vs. HC | 3.09 | 1.18 | 4.99 | |
| CIS vs. HC | 0.60 | −1.10 | 2.30 | 0.49 | |
| Male vs. female sex | −0.45 | −1.81 | 0.91 | 0.52 | |
| Age | −0.01 | −0.09 | 0.06 | 0.74 | |
| 25(OH)D | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.04 | 0.54 | |
Table shows unadjusted parameter estimates with 95% CIs.
Statistically significant p-values are indicated by bolded font and shading.
p-Values <0.05 indicates a p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.
CI, confidence interval; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; HC, healthy controls; MS, multiple sclerosis.
Figure 5Inverse correlation between time to relapse [conversion from clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to multiple sclerosis] and (A) proportions of IgG3 (%IgG) or (B) IgG3 levels in serum from people with CIS (n = 16). Serum was collected within 120 days of CIS diagnosis and individuals were followed for 12 months using magnetic resonance imaging to determine date of relapse. IgG3 was measured using cytometric bead arrays. Spearman correlation is shown using Spearman’s rho (ρ), alongside p-values.
A comparison of absolute serum levels (μg/mL) and proportions of IgG subclasses (%IgG) vs. %B cells in individuals with clinically isolated syndrome (n = 20).
| % B cells | Phenotype | Statistic | IgA | IgM | Total IgG | Calculated IgG1 | IgG2 | IgG3 | IgG4 | Calculated IgG1% IgG | IgG2% IgG | IgG3%IgG | IgG4% IgG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transitional B cells | CD19+CD20+CD27−IgD+CD24hiCD38hi | ρ | −0.25 | −0.28 | −0.41 | −0.40 | −0.12 | −0.36 | 0.15 | −0.10 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.28 |
| 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.86 | 0.23 | |||
| Switched memory B cells | CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD− | ρ | −0.25 | −0.23 | 0.10 | 0.23 | −0.34 | 0.08 | −0.17 | −0.01 | −0.24 | ||
| 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.97 | 0.31 | |||||
| Non-switched memory B cells | CD19+CD20+CD27+IgD+ | ρ | −0.23 | −0.28 | 0.06 | 0.04 | −0.03 | 0.23 | −0.01 | −0.04 | −0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.32 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.91 | |||
| CD27 + memory B cells | CD19+CD20+CD27+ | ρ | −0.31 | −0.41 | 0.10 | 0.10 | −0.17 | 0.27 | −0.05 | 0.15 | −0.26 | 0.06 | −0.05 |
| 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.48 | 0.25 | 0.84 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 0.79 | 0.84 | |||
| Plasmablasts | CD19+CD20−CD38hiCD27hiIgD−CD24− | ρ | 0.34 | 0.20 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.35 | 0.37 | 0.10 | 0.13 | −0.28 | 0.12 | |
| 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.24 | 0.62 | ||||
| Double negative memory B cells | CD19+CD20+IgD−CD27− | ρ | −0.25 | −0.07 | −0.15 | −0.11 | −0.35 | 0.19 | −0.12 | 0.35 | −0.28 | 0.44 | −0.04 |
| 0.30 | 0.77 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.13 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.88 | |||
Statistically significant correlation is shown in bolded values with shading.
p-Values <0.05 indicates a p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.
A comparison of absolute serum levels (μg/mL) and proportions of IgG subclasses (%IgG) vs. %Treg or %Tfr cells in individuals with clinically isolated syndrome (n = 20).
| Phenotype | Statistic | IgA | IgM | Total IgG | Calculated IgG1 | IgG2 | IgG3 | IgG4 | Calculated IgG1% IgG | IgG2% IgG | IgG3%IgG | IgG4% IgG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrI Treg (%Treg) | CD3+CD4+CXCR5−FoxP3loCD45RA+ Treg | ρ | −0.08 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.11 | −0.01 | −0.03 | −0.11 | 0.06 |
| 0.73 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.81 | |||
| FrII Treg (%Treg) | CD3+CD4+CXCR5−FoxP3hiCD45RA− Treg | ρ | 0.22 | −0.13 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.16 | −0.21 | −0.02 | 0.003 |
| 0.36 | 0.60 | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.88 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.94 | 0.99 | |||
| FrIII non-Treg (%Treg) | CD3+CD4+CXCR5−FoxP3loCD45RA− Treg | ρ | −0.06 | −0.20 | −0.30 | −0.14 | −0.18 | −0.01 | −0.31 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.11 | |
| 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.96 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.32 | 0.65 | ||||
| FrI Tfr (%Tfr) | CD3+CD4+CXCR5+FoxP3loCD45RA+Tfr | ρ | −0.07 | 0.44 | 0.14 | −0.03 | 0.13 | 0.12 | −0.003 | −0.13 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| 0.77 | 0.05 | 0.57 | 0.93 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.99 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.88 | |||
| FrII Tfr (%Tfr) | CD3+CD4+CXCR5+FoxP3hiCD45RA− Tfr | ρ | 0.001 | −0.22 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.33 | −0.06 | 0.10 | −0.1 | 0.105 | −0.14 |
| 0.10 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 0.15 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.56 | |||
| FrIII non-Tfr (%Tfr) | CD3+CD4+CXCR5+FoxP3loCD45RA− Tfr | ρ | 0.02 | −0.24 | −0.36 | 0.01 | −0.21 | −0.38 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.07 | −0.05 | 0.16 |
| 0.92 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 0.37 | 0.10 | 0.57 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.51 | |||
Statistically significant correlation is shown in bolded values with shading.
A comparison of absolute serum levels (μg/mL) and proportions of IgG subclasses (%IgG) vs. Helios expression on Treg and Tfr cell (median fluorescence intensity; MFI) in individuals with clinically isolated syndrome.
| Statistic | IgA | IgM | Total IgG | Calculated IgG1 | IgG2 | IgG3 | IgG4 | Calculated IgG1% IgG | IgG2% IgG | IgG3% IgG | IgG4% IgG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrI Treg Helios expression (MFI) | ρ | 0.27 | −0.21 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.15 | −0.23 | 0.24 | −0.10 | 0.38 | ||
| 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.53 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.10 | ||||
| FrII Treg Helios expression (MFI) | ρ | 0.35 | −0.21 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.05 | −0.007 | |||||
| 0.12 | 0.37 | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.83 | 0.98 | |||||||
| FrIII non-Treg Helios expression (MFI) | ρ | 0.37 | −0.25 | 0.21 | −0.01 | 0.03 | −0.08 | |||||
| 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.74 | |||||||
| FrI Tfr Helios expression (MFI) | ρ | 0.34 | −0.20 | 0.39 | 0.19 | −0.15 | 0.15 | −0.17 | 0.36 | |||
| 0.14 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.12 | |||||
| FrII Tfr Helios expression (MFI) | ρ | 0.26 | −0.16 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.22 | 0.38 | −0.29 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.32 | |
| 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.77 | 0.17 | |||
| FrIII non-Tfr Helios expression (MFI) | ρ | 0.25 | −0.23 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.42 | −0.19 | 0.22 | −0.13 | 0.32 | |
| 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.59 | 0.17 | |||
Statistically significant correlation is shown in bolded values with shading.
p-Values <0.05 indicates a p-value between 0.01 and 0.05.