| Literature DB >> 32354087 |
Edoardo Piombo1,2, Ahmed Abdelfattah3,4, Yaara Danino5, Shoshana Salim5, Oleg Feygenberg5, Davide Spadaro1,2, Michael Wisniewski6, Samir Droby5.
Abstract
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) is considered to be a highly important food crop in several African and Middle Eastern countries due to its nutritional value and health-promoting properties. Microbial contamination of dates has been of concern to consumers, but very few works have analyzed in detail the microbial load of the different parts of date fruit. In the present work, we characterized the fungal communities of date fruit using a metagenomic approach, analyzing the data for differences between microbial populations residing in the pulp and peel of "Medjool" dates at the different stages of fruit development. The results revealed that Penicillium, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, and Alternaria were the most abundant genera in both parts of the fruit, however, the distribution of taxa among the time points and tissue types (peel vs. pulp) was very diverse. Penicillium was more abundant in the pulp at the green developmental stage (Kimri), while Aspergillus was more frequent in the peel at the brown developmental stage (Tamer). The highest abundance of Alternaria was detected at the earliest sampled stage of fruit development (Hababauk stage). Cladosporium had a high level of abundance in peel tissues at the Hababauk and yellow (Khalal) stages. Regarding the yeast community, the abundance of Candida remained stable up until the Khalal stage, but exhibited a dramatic increase in abundance at the Tamer stage in peel tissues, while the level of Metschnikowia, a genus containing several species with postharvest biocontrol activity, exhibited no significant differences between the two tissue types or stages of fruit development. This work constitutes a comprehensive metagenomic analysis of the fungal microbiome of date fruits, and has identified changes in the composition of the fungal microbiome in peel and pulp tissues at the different stages of fruit development. Notably, this study has also characterized the endophytic fungal microbiome present in pulp tissues of dates.Entities:
Keywords: ITS; Phoenix dactylifera; date; metagenome; microbiome; post-harvest
Year: 2020 PMID: 32354087 PMCID: PMC7284588 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8050641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Photographs of dates at sequential stages of ripening. From left to right: Hababauk, Kimri or green fruit, Khalal or yellow fruit, Tamer or brown fruit.
Average moisture and total soluble solids measured in “Medjool” dates at the Hababuk, Kimri, Khalal, and Tamer stages of ripening.
| Fruit Stage | Moisture (%) | Total Soluble Solids (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Hababauk | 72.9 ± 1.2 | 6.1 ± 0.6 |
| Kimri | 84.2 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 1.0 |
| Khalal | 61.3 ± 0.4 | 27.0 ± 0.81 |
| Tamer | 26.8 ± 2.0 | 51.5 ± 0.6 |
Figure 2Clustering of the samples according to Bray–Curtis distance, after cumulative sum scaling (CSS) normalization.
Alpha diversity comparison among the considered tissues and stages of the study. The selected alpha diversity metrics were the Shannon Diversity Index and the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
| Group1 | Group2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage3:Khalal Peel | Stage4:Tamer Pulp | 0.161 | 0.891 |
| Stage3:Khalal Peel | Stage1:Hababauk | 0.503 | 0.290 |
| Stage4:Tamer Peel | Stage2:Kimri Peel | 0.292 | 0.179 |
| Stage4:Tamer Pulp | Stage1:Hababauk | 0.305 | 0.313 |
| Stage4:Tamer Peel | Stage1:Hababauk | 0.122 | 0.799 |
| Stage3:Khalal Pulp | Stage1:Hababauk | 0.860 | 0.752 |
| Stage2:Kimri Pulp | Stage1:Hababauk | 0.105 | 0.315 |
| Stage2:Kimri Pulp | Stage2:Kimri Peel | 0.168 | 0.231 |
| Stage3:Khalal Peel | Stage2:Kimri Peel | 0.357 | 0.893 |
| Stage3:Khalal Peel | Stage2:Kimri Pulp | 0.091 | 0.344 |
| Stage3:Khalal Peel | Stage4:Tamer Peel | 0.553 | 0.462 |
| Stage3:Khalal Peel | Stage3:Khalal Pulp | 0.460 | 0.714 |
| Stage4:Tamer Pulp | Stage3:Khalal Pulp | 0.363 | 0.717 |
| Stage2:Kimri Pulp | Stage4:Tamer Peel | 0.087 | 0.151 |
| Stage3:Khalal Pulp | Stage4:Tamer Peel | 0.308 | 0.489 |
| Stage2:Kimri Pulp | Stage3:Khalal Pulp | 0.105 | 0.196 |
| Stage3:Khalal Pulp | Stage2:Kimri Peel | 0.477 | 0.359 |
| Stage4:Tamer Pulp | Stage2:Kimri Peel | 0.888 | 0.784 |
| Stage4:Tamer Pulp | Stage4:Tamer Peel | 0.126 | 0.168 |
| Stage4:Tamer Pulp | Stage2:Kimri Pulp | 0.090 | 0.333 |
| Stage2:Kimri Peel | Stage1:Hababauk | 0.526 | 0.231 |
Figure 3Shannon Diversity Index (A) and number of observed OTUs (B) of the analyzed tissues and developmental stages of dates.
Figure 4Percentages of the various phyla comprising the fungal microbiome of the different tissue types (peel and pulp) and developmental stages.
Figure 5Heatmap of the CSS-normalized read count of the most abundant genera detected in the different tissue types and developmental stages of date fruit.
Number of OTUs of each genus present in each and every one of the analyzed tissues and stages (Hababauk, Kimri Pulp, Kimri Peel, Khalal Pulp, Khalal Peel, Tamer Pulp, and Tamer Peel).
| Genus | Core OTUs |
|---|---|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
| Unidentified | 3 |